From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dsterba@suse.com,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
terrelln@fb.com, tglx@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/lib: Use REP MOVSB for large memcpy() on ERMS CPUs without FSRM
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atiKeB-76nOj-ztU@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017192727.2760919-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 12:27:25PM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> index 12a23fa7c44c5..6b3e203b6087c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
> @@ -31,9 +31,10 @@
> * which the compiler could/should do much better anyway.
> */
> SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(__memcpy)
> - ALTERNATIVE "jmp memcpy_orig", "", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
> + /* The FSRM destination move shares the space used by the ERMS jump. */
> + ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp memcpy_orig", "jmp memcpy_erms", X86_FEATURE_ERMS, \
> + "movq %rdi, %rax", X86_FEATURE_FSRM
>
> - movq %rdi, %rax
Moving MOVQ inside ALTERNATIVE_2 is ugly...
And it only turns a 5-byte NOP into a 2-byte one on FSRM.
What is the point?
> movq %rdx, %rcx
> rep movsb
> RET
> @@ -171,3 +172,11 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(memcpy_orig)
> RET
> SYM_FUNC_END(memcpy_orig)
>
> +SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(memcpy_erms)
> + cmpq $2048, %rdx
> + jb memcpy_orig
> + movq %rdi, %rax
> + movq %rdx, %rcx
> + rep movsb
> + RET
> +SYM_FUNC_END(memcpy_erms)
Copies below 2048 now take two jumps to reach memcpy_orig() instead of
one, and David's point is that nearly all kernel copies are that small.
Can the check go in memcpy_orig() after the existing 32-byte compare?
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 10:04 Usama Arif
2026-10-15 10:39 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-10-17 19:27 ` Usama Arif
2026-10-21 9:54 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-10-21 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-10-22 8:49 ` David Laight
2026-10-17 21:42 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atiKeB-76nOj-ztU@thinkstation \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=terrelln@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®