Re: [PATCH v2] signal: respect the blocked mask in dequeue_synchronous_signal()

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 10/22, Avi Weiss wrote:
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Restore the original queue-scan comment following Eric's feedback.
> - Clarify that ordinarily queued signals can match the
>   synchronous-signal heuristic.
> - Rebase onto current mainline.
>
>  kernel/signal.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index cb6ec7054eee..7e690f4fb5bc 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ static int dequeue_synchronous_signal(kernel_siginfo_t *info)
>  	list_for_each_entry(q, &pending->list, list) {
>  		/* Synchronous signals have a positive si_code */
>  		if ((q->info.si_code > SI_USER) &&
> -		    (sigmask(q->info.si_signo) & SYNCHRONOUS_MASK)) {
> +		    (sigmask(q->info.si_signo) & SYNCHRONOUS_MASK) &&
> +		    !sigismember(&tsk->blocked, q->info.si_signo)) {

Still:

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>


I was going to send another cleanup on top of this fix. Can't do this today,
but let me explain... It is a bit ugly to check si_signo twice. And afaics we
have another problem. sys_rt_sigqueueinfo() allows to send a SI_FROMKERNEL RT
signal to itself. In this case sigmask(q->info.si_signo) leads to UB on 32-bit.

I'll recheck, write the changelog, and send something like below tomorrow.
perhaps rt_sigmask() makes more sense than sigset_t...

Oleg.


From 6f7441ff08d7b88b96ac6787b40634e8c173003c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 13:43:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] signal: cleanup the .si_signo checks in dequeue_synchronous_signal()

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 7386b9552dc3..9cfd4d03cad4 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -676,21 +676,24 @@ static int dequeue_synchronous_signal(kernel_siginfo_t *info)
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	struct sigpending *pending = &tsk->pending;
 	struct sigqueue *q, *sync = NULL;
+	unsigned long mask;
+	sigset_t xxx;
 
 	/*
 	 * Might a synchronous signal be in the queue?
 	 */
-	if (!((pending->signal.sig[0] & ~tsk->blocked.sig[0]) & SYNCHRONOUS_MASK))
+	mask = (pending->signal.sig[0] & ~tsk->blocked.sig[0]) & SYNCHRONOUS_MASK;
+	if (!mask)
 		return 0;
 
+	siginitset(&xxx, mask);
 	/*
 	 * Return the first synchronous signal in the queue.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(q, &pending->list, list) {
 		/* Synchronous signals have a positive si_code */
-		if ((q->info.si_code > SI_USER) &&
-		    (sigmask(q->info.si_signo) & SYNCHRONOUS_MASK) &&
-		    !sigismember(&tsk->blocked, q->info.si_signo)) {
+		if (SI_FROMKERNEL(&q->info) &&
+		    sigismember(&xxx, q->info.si_signo)) {
 			sync = q;
 			goto next;
 		}
-- 
2.55.0