From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: lazy load JSON::PP only when --json is used
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 22:44:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auUPo66ISiR2gzmi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ad2ae74e3257578cac561f19af63ccb94fce85a.camel@perches.com>
On 10/30, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2026-10-30 at 17:17 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/30, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > This module is only needed with the --json option. Use "require" to
> > > > load this module dynamically inside the "if ($json)" block instead.
> > > The patch may be sensible but could fail the same way
> > > if you used the --json option with your version.
> >
> > Of course, "./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --json ..." will still fail
> > the same way without JSON::PP. But with this patch get_maintainer.pl
> > works without the --json option.
>
> What does that failure output?
Hmm. I am not sure I understand you concerns. Let me add more details.
So, I think this patch makes no difference if JSON::PP is installed.
Do you agree?
Now lets see what happens on my machine where JSON::PP is NOT installed.
Without --json:
Before this patch:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Can't locate JSON/PP.pm in @INC (you may need to install the JSON::PP module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.42 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.42 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl line 24.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl line 24.
After:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> (maintainer:GET_MAINTAINER SCRIPT)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
With --json:
Before this patch:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --json ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Can't locate JSON/PP.pm in @INC (you may need to install the JSON::PP module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.42 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.42 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl line 24.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl line 24.
After:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --json ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
Can't locate JSON/PP.pm in @INC (you may need to install the JSON::PP module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.42 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.42 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl line 665.
Same failure. Sorry, I don't understand what is not clear for you :(
> Dunno. Depending on the current failure output
> maybe adding something like the below is better:
>
> use Module::Load::Conditional qw(check_install);
>
> if (!check_install(module => 'JSON:PP')) {
> die "$P: --json not available - missing perl module JSON:PP\n";
> }
But why? Why make get_maintainer.pl depend on yet another module?
FYI, on my Fedora 44
$ perl -we 'use Module::Load::Conditional qw(check_install);'
Can't locate Module/Load/Conditional.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Module::Load::Conditional module) (@INC entries checked: /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.42 /usr/local/share/perl5/5.42 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5) at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
And for what ???
If we want to "improve" the errmsg, we can use "eval { require JSON::PP; }; die ... if $@"
but this looks absolutely pointless to me.
Let me repeat. If JSON::PP is not installed, then get_maintainer.pl
with --json:
fails the same way before or after this patch, I see nothing to improve.
without --json:
fails before this patch, works after this patch
Sorry, I really can't understand your concerns.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 15:43 Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-30 16:07 ` Joe Perches
2026-10-30 16:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-30 16:32 ` Joe Perches
2026-10-30 21:44 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-10-30 22:18 ` Sasha Levin
2026-10-30 22:19 ` Joe Perches
2026-10-30 22:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-30 23:17 ` Joe Perches
2026-10-30 23:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-30 16:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auUPo66ISiR2gzmi@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®