mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,  Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	 Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	 Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:59:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxzbxa40B6uLAyN@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-slub_tiny_rework-v3-1-0484ce59eabb@kernel.org>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> Several of slab kunit tests allocate and free a single object from the
> test cache, perform intentional UAF actions and validation, while
> expecting the empty slab to stay on the partial list.
> 
> This subtly relies on non-zero s->min_partial. It currently compile-time
> defaults to a non-zero value, but in theory a sysfs write racing with
> the kunit test could change it.

> More importantly, the upcoming
> CONFIG_SLUB_TINY changes will make it possible to run the kunit tests
> with s->min_partial being a compile-time zero, which means the tests
> will now do unintended UAF writes on the page allocator level, and also
> report failures, as flagged by sashiko [1].

Makes sense.
 
> To prevent this in a robust way, add an extra object allocation to the
> tests, that will prevent the slab being freed. Use migrate_disable() to
> prevent migration to a different NUMA node, which would place the
> allocation to a different slab.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261024-slub_tiny_rework-v2-0-bf1419ab5ffd@kernel.org?part=8
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---

Looks good to me,
Acked-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05  8:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 12:59   ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] kasan, " Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:03   ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:12   ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 14:30   ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 14:36     ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 15:02       ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05  8:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auxzbxa40B6uLAyN@thinkstation \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®