Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add strprefix() and fix a bug with it

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 03:16:45PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Date: 2026-11-05 15:01:22+0100
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>

[...]

> > I have no idea what causes it but I'm getting so many patches lately
> > that are subsequent iterations of a series sent with In-Reply-To: header
> > pointing to a previous thread.
> 
> I don't know what others do, but in my case it's a conscious manual
> action.  I use --in-reply-to in git-format-patch(1) to make all
> revisions of patch sets be descendants of the cover letter of v1.
> 
> We do this in the Linux man-pages, as it helps me keep track of all
> revisions of a patch set easily in mutt(1), without having to follow
> links or use more-complex tools like b4(1).

Exactly the same reason on my side to *not* put everything into a single
thread!

> > Don't do this. Each new iteration must be a separate thread. Please use
> > b4 to manage patch series.
> 
> I won't use b4(1); I like bare git-send-email(1) and git-format-patch(1).
> But yeah, I can send them as separate threads, if that's the preference
> here.

Yes, in Linux kernel majority of the maintainers (a bit of speculation,
I haven't counted, but it feels like this to me) do want separate threads.
IIO with a huge traffic is one of them, tty/serial IIRC also does because
it's how Greg's workflow is set up.

> Out of curiosity, what's the benefit of having separate threads?

^^^ See above.

> (Or the converse question: what's the main problem of using a single
>  thread?)

In mutt for tracking I often delete the old email threads when they are
considered closed to me (or archive, if you wish), I don't want a blast
from the past for this. It's like starting fresh on each Monday :-)

> They're morally a continuation of the previous threads, which is why it
> makes sense to me to have them as subthreads.

The email thread with big patch-series and discussions looks awful
in such a setup (my opinion).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko