From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
"Derek Barbosa" <debarbos@redhat.com>,
"Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@amutable.com>,
"Daan De Meyer" <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>,
"Luca Boccassi" <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/10] kconfig: Introduce checkconfig target
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 21:07:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avIn71Md3LtNaYje@lx-t490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-202759@kernel.org>
On Sat, 07 Nov 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > +checkconfig := $(PYTHON3) -B $(srctree)/tools/kconfig-checker/check.py
> > +list_checkconfig_rules = \
> > + echo -n >&2 "Available RULES: "; \
> > + $(checkconfig) list-rules >&2; \
> > + echo >&2
> > +
> > +PHONY += checkconfig
> > +checkconfig:
> > + $(Q)if [ -z "$(RULES)" ]; then \
> > + echo >&2 "Usage: make RULES=<profile> checkconfig"; \
> > + $(list_checkconfig_rules); \
> > + exit 2; \
> > + fi
> > + $(Q)if ! $(checkconfig) list-rules | grep -qw "$(RULES)"; then \
> > + echo >&2 "Unknown RULES profile = $(RULES)"; \
> > + $(list_checkconfig_rules); \
> > + exit 2; \
> > + fi
> > + $(Q)$(checkconfig) check -r "$(RULES)" -c "$(KCONFIG_CONFIG)"
>
...
>
> When either module is missing, check.py writes the error to stderr,
> produces no stdout, and exits with os.EX_UNAVAILABLE. Because the POSIX
> shell pipeline ignores the exit status of $(checkconfig) list-rules,
> grep -qw exits 1 on the empty stdout and the negated condition enters the
> branch. That reports a valid setting such as RULES=preempt_rt as an
> unknown profile and runs $(list_checkconfig_rules), which invokes check.py
> a second time and prints a duplicate module error on the same line after
> "Available RULES: ".
It works, so there is no reason to complicate things.
For example, invoking the make target from a container with old Python:
$ make checkconfig
Usage: make RULES=<profile> [OVERLAY=<overlay>] checkconfig
Available RULES: Error: Python 3.9 or later is required
make[2]: *** [scripts/kconfig/Makefile:138: checkconfig] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/home/darwi/linux/Makefile:772: checkconfig] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
and:
$ make RULES=nonExistent checkconfig
Error: Python 3.9 or later is required
Unknown RULES profile = nonExistent
Available RULES: Error: Python 3.9 or later is required
make[2]: *** [scripts/kconfig/Makefile:139: checkconfig] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/home/darwi/linux/Makefile:772: checkconfig] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
The duplicate error, which is a single line, is no big deal. IMO, it's
better than complicating the Makefile for that single edge case.
>
> In addition, grep -qw treats $(RULES) as a regular expression with word
> boundaries against the comma-separated output of list-rules rather than
> matching an exact profile name, and spawns Python twice on every valid
> invocation even though check.py check -r already validates the profile
> name.
>
That's good catch; will fix.
Thanks,
Ahmed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 9:19 [PATCH v1 00/10] tools: Introduce a kernel configuration checker Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] kconfig-checker: Add schema for rule files Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-08 18:59 ` Julian Braha
2026-11-09 12:40 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] kconfig-checker: Introduce PREEMPT_RT configuration rules Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 18:09 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] kconfig-checker: Add the configuration checker code Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 19:29 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-08 18:59 ` Julian Braha
2026-11-09 13:00 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] kconfig: Introduce checkconfig target Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 20:07 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2026-11-08 18:59 ` Julian Braha
2026-11-09 0:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-11-09 13:18 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] Documentation: Describe kconfig-checker usage and design Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] kconfig-checker: Split schema to support component reuse Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 18:22 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] kconfig-checker: Introduce overlays schema Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 16:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kconfig-checker: Add support for rule overlays Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] Documentation: Describe kconfig-checker overlays Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-07 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 16:50 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-06 9:19 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] kconfig: Introduce OVERLAY= for make checkconfig Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-08 18:59 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] tools: Introduce a kernel configuration checker Julian Braha
2026-11-09 0:37 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-11-09 16:15 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-09 16:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-11-09 17:04 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-11-09 15:49 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avIn71Md3LtNaYje@lx-t490 \
--to=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=debarbos@redhat.com \
--cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luca.boccassi@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zbyszek@amutable.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®