From: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Carlos Santa" <carlos.santa@intel.com>,
"Ryan Neph" <ryanneph@google.com>,
"Christian Koenig" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/33] drm/ttm: Bound page (re)allocation per defragmentation move
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 18:44:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avKE9ruZsQwbsQEa@nvishwa1-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711025619.2540575-9-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 07:55:54PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>A defragmentation move reallocates an object's backing at the device's
>beneficial order and harvests whatever the allocator cannot upgrade from
>the old tt. For a very large object this can reallocate (and have the
>driver re-copy) the entire backing in one move, which is expensive and
>can stall concurrent work for an unbounded stretch.
Assisted-by: LLM
NIT...So, a time budge would also be helpful here along with the size
budge?
>
>Add an optional per-move byte budget so a large object can be upgraded in
>slices across successive moves. Plumb a new
>ttm_operation_ctx::defrag_bytes_remaining through to the pool allocator:
>only pages actually (re)allocated at the beneficial order are charged
>against it; pages harvested (borrowed) from defrag_old_tt are free and do
>not count. Once the budget is exhausted the allocator stops upgrading and
>completes the new tt by harvesting the remainder of the old tt as-is,
>marking the tt sub-optimal (TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED) so the
>driver re-queues it and a later move resumes the upgrade. The slices
>already upgraded come back as free already-beneficial harvests on the
>next pass, so each move spends budget only on new forward progress.
>
>The allocator decrements the budget as it allocates and writes the unused
>remainder back on success, letting the caller compute how many bytes were
>actually spent. A value of 0 means unlimited (upgrade the whole object in
>one move), preserving the previous behaviour. This is only consulted on a
>defragmentation move, i.e. when defrag_old_tt is set.
>
>Cc: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
>Cc: Ryan Neph <ryanneph@google.com>
>Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
>Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
>Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
>Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-opus-4.8
>Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 14 +++++
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>index 52f5e64f05dd..1673e81b8df8 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
>@@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ struct ttm_pool_dma {
> * @dma_addr: Pointer to the next tt dma_address entry to populate if any.
> * @remaining_pages: Remaining pages to populate.
> * @tt_caching: The requested cpu-caching for the pages allocated.
>+ * @defrag_bytes_remaining: Byte budget for newly (re)allocated pages on a
>+ * defragmentation move, seeded from ttm_operation_ctx::defrag_bytes_remaining.
>+ * Pages harvested (borrowed) from the old tt are free and do not count; once
>+ * this drops to zero the allocator stops upgrading and harvests the remainder.
>+ * On completion it holds the unused budget. 0 means unlimited (no defrag cap).
> */
> struct ttm_pool_alloc_state {
> struct page **pages;
>@@ -84,6 +89,7 @@ struct ttm_pool_alloc_state {
> dma_addr_t *dma_addr;
> pgoff_t remaining_pages;
> enum ttm_caching tt_caching;
>+ s64 defrag_bytes_remaining;
> };
>
> /**
>@@ -780,6 +786,7 @@ static void ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(const struct ttm_tt *tt,
> alloc->dma_addr = tt->dma_address;
> alloc->remaining_pages = tt->num_pages;
> alloc->tt_caching = tt->caching;
>+ alloc->defrag_bytes_remaining = 0;
> }
>
> /*
>@@ -885,8 +892,12 @@ static int ttm_pool_harvest_page(struct ttm_tt *old_tt, unsigned int order,
>
> static int ttm_pool_harvest_remaining(struct ttm_pool *pool,
> struct ttm_tt *old_tt, pgoff_t off,
>- struct ttm_pool_alloc_state *alloc)
>+ struct ttm_pool_alloc_state *alloc,
>+ bool *suboptimal)
> {
>+ unsigned int beneficial = ttm_pool_beneficial_order(pool);
>+ pgoff_t bnr = 1UL << beneficial;
>+
> /*
> * @off is always an old-tt chunk head here, never a tail page, so
> * reading the per-chunk order below is safe. This holds because:
>@@ -906,8 +917,23 @@ static int ttm_pool_harvest_remaining(struct ttm_pool *pool,
> struct page *p = old_tt->pages[off];
> unsigned int order = ttm_pool_page_order(pool, p);
> pgoff_t nr = 1UL << order;
>+ pgoff_t num_pages = off + alloc->remaining_pages;
num_pages seems loop invariant. May be move it out of the loop as total_pages
or something?
> int r;
>
>+ /*
>+ * Only report a sub-optimal backing when a chunk we cannot
>+ * upgrade (out of budget/prealloc) sits in a beneficial-order
>+ * aligned region that fully fits in the tt: that region could
>+ * have been upgraded with more budget. A chunk below the
>+ * beneficial order is expected for the unaligned tail (the last
>+ * partial beneficial-order region) and for already beneficial-
>+ * order harvests - neither leaves real defrag work, so they must
>+ * not flag the tt for re-queue.
>+ */
>+ if (beneficial && order < beneficial &&
>+ round_down(off, bnr) + bnr <= num_pages)
>+ *suboptimal = true;
>+
> r = ttm_pool_harvest_page(old_tt, order, off, alloc);
> if (r)
> return r;
>@@ -951,6 +977,7 @@ struct ttm_pool_alloc_iter {
> struct ttm_tt *defrag_old_tt;
> unsigned int beneficial_order;
> gfp_t gfp_flags;
>+ bool defrag_capped;
>
> /* Mutated as the loop walks the orders. */
> unsigned int order;
>@@ -962,6 +989,44 @@ struct ttm_pool_alloc_iter {
> struct page *p;
> };
>
>+/*
>+ * Defrag move budget exhausted: the upgrade can make no further progress this
>+ * pass. Snapshot @defrag_capped is set only when a byte budget was in force at
>+ * entry.
>+ */
>+static bool ttm_pool_iter_defrag_exhausted(const struct ttm_pool_alloc_iter *it)
>+{
>+ if (!it->defrag_old_tt)
>+ return false;
>+
>+ return it->defrag_capped && it->alloc->defrag_bytes_remaining <= 0;
>+}
>+
>+/*
>+ * Complete the new tt by harvesting the rest of the old tt as-is (borrowing its
>+ * pages, including any still below beneficial order). Never fall back to in-lock
>+ * reclaim for the shortfall - that would reintroduce the stall we preallocated
>+ * to avoid. Only re-queue (flag) the tt when the harvested remainder is
>+ * genuinely sub-optimal; if every remaining old chunk was already at beneficial
>+ * order the move fully upgraded the object.
>+ */
>+static int ttm_pool_iter_harvest_rest(struct ttm_pool_alloc_iter *it)
>+{
>+ pgoff_t off = it->tt->num_pages - it->alloc->remaining_pages;
>+ bool suboptimal = false;
>+ int r;
>+
>+ r = ttm_pool_harvest_remaining(it->pool, it->defrag_old_tt, off,
>+ it->alloc, &suboptimal);
>+ if (r)
>+ return r;
>+
>+ if (suboptimal)
>+ it->tt->page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
>+
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> /*
> * Defrag move: reuse an already beneficial-order chunk from the old tt at this
> * offset rather than reallocating it. Harvest whatever order the old chunk has
>@@ -1062,11 +1127,12 @@ static int ttm_pool_iter_lower_order(struct ttm_pool_alloc_iter *it)
> if (it->alloc_count && it->defrag_old_tt) {
> pgoff_t off = it->tt->num_pages -
> it->alloc->remaining_pages;
>+ bool suboptimal = false;
> int r;
>
> r = ttm_pool_harvest_remaining(it->pool,
> it->defrag_old_tt, off,
>- it->alloc);
>+ it->alloc, &suboptimal);
As suboptimal is not required here, probably send a NULL here and have
ttm_pool_harvest_remaining handle that NULL.
> if (r)
> return r;
>
>@@ -1121,10 +1187,23 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> gfp_flags |= GFP_HIGHUSER;
>
> it.gfp_flags = gfp_flags;
>+ it.defrag_capped = it.defrag_old_tt && alloc->defrag_bytes_remaining > 0;
>
> for (it.order = ttm_pool_alloc_find_order(MAX_PAGE_ORDER, alloc);
> alloc->remaining_pages;
> it.order = ttm_pool_alloc_find_order(it.order, alloc)) {
>+ /*
>+ * Out of defrag budget: harvest the rest of the old tt as-is and
>+ * stop (the tt is re-queued if the remainder is still
>+ * sub-optimal).
>+ */
>+ if (ttm_pool_iter_defrag_exhausted(&it)) {
>+ r = ttm_pool_iter_harvest_rest(&it);
>+ if (r)
>+ goto error_free_all;
>+ break;
>+ }
>+
> /* Reuse an already beneficial-order chunk from the old tt. */
> r = ttm_pool_iter_reuse_old(&it);
> if (r < 0)
>@@ -1155,6 +1234,15 @@ static int __ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> goto error_free_all;
> }
>
>+ /*
>+ * Charge a newly (re)allocated chunk against the defrag move
>+ * budget. Harvested chunks borrow the old tt's pages for free
>+ * and never reach here.
>+ */
>+ if (it.defrag_capped)
>+ alloc->defrag_bytes_remaining -=
>+ (s64)(1UL << it.order) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>+
> it.alloc_count++;
> }
>
>@@ -1204,14 +1292,21 @@ int ttm_pool_alloc(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct ttm_tt *tt,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
> {
> struct ttm_pool_alloc_state alloc;
>+ int ret;
>
> if (WARN_ON(ttm_tt_is_backed_up(tt)))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> tt->page_flags &= ~TTM_TT_FLAG_BENEFICIAL_ORDER_FAILED;
> ttm_pool_alloc_state_init(tt, &alloc);
>+ alloc.defrag_bytes_remaining = ctx->defrag_bytes_remaining;
>+
>+ ret = __ttm_pool_alloc(pool, tt, ctx, &alloc, NULL);
>+
>+ /* Report the unused defrag budget back to the caller. */
>+ ctx->defrag_bytes_remaining = alloc.defrag_bytes_remaining;
>
>- return __ttm_pool_alloc(pool, tt, ctx, &alloc, NULL);
>+ return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_pool_alloc);
>
>diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>index fcaba5fb8bf7..6124d2627b47 100644
>--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>@@ -223,6 +223,20 @@ struct ttm_operation_ctx {
> * NULL for non-defrag operations.
> */
> struct ttm_tt *defrag_old_tt;
>+ /**
>+ * @defrag_bytes_remaining: Byte budget for newly allocated pages during
>+ * a defragmentation move. Only pages that are actually (re)allocated at
>+ * the beneficial order count against it; pages harvested (borrowed) from
>+ * @defrag_old_tt are free and do not. When the budget is exhausted the
>+ * pool allocator stops upgrading and completes the new tt by harvesting
>+ * the remainder of @defrag_old_tt, marking the tt sub-optimal so the
>+ * driver can resume on a later pass. The allocator decrements this as it
>+ * allocates, so on return it holds the unused budget (which the caller
>+ * can use to compute how many bytes were spent). A value of 0 means
>+ * unlimited (upgrade the whole object). Only consulted when
>+ * @defrag_old_tt is set.
>+ */
>+ s64 defrag_bytes_remaining;
If user specifies -ve value, currently it means unlimited. So, may be update the
documentation here to say "A value of <= 0 means unlimited"? Or, better only accept
>=0 value from the user ctx here.
Niranjana
> /**
> * @resv: Reservation object to be used together with
> * @allow_res_evict.
>--
>2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 2:55 [PATCH v3 00/33] drm/ttm, drm/xe: Minimize dma-resv hold times and defragment sub-optimally backed BOs Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/33] drm/ttm/pool: Allow backing off reclaim at the beneficial order Matthew Brost
2026-11-06 2:55 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/33] drm/ttm/pool: Add ttm_pool_page_order_nodma() helper Matthew Brost
2026-11-05 11:27 ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-06 2:30 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 03/33] drm/ttm: Record sub-optimal page order allocations in ttm_tt Matthew Brost
2026-11-06 2:34 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-11-06 20:06 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/33] drm/ttm: Introduce ttm_pool_alloc_iter for __ttm_pool_alloc() Matthew Brost
2026-11-06 2:39 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/33] drm/ttm: Support defragmentation moves Matthew Brost
2026-11-06 2:51 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/33] drm/ttm: Add fault injection for beneficial-order allocation failures Matthew Brost
2026-11-06 2:54 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/33] drm/ttm: Harvest beneficial-order pages on defragmentation moves Matthew Brost
2026-11-10 2:37 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/33] drm/ttm: Bound page (re)allocation per defragmentation move Matthew Brost
2026-11-10 2:44 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura [this message]
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/33] drm/ttm: Preallocate beneficial-order defrag pages outside the lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/33] drm/ttm: Add full out-of-lock preallocation for ttm_pool_alloc() Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 15/33] drm/xe: Track BOs backed at a sub-optimal page order Matthew Brost
2026-11-07 4:49 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 16/33] drm/xe: Back off beneficial-order reclaim under defrag pressure Matthew Brost
2026-11-07 5:02 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 17/33] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_copy_defrag() for on-GPU defrag copies Matthew Brost
2026-11-03 12:58 ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-03 20:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 12:37 ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-07 5:07 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 18/33] drm/xe: Handle defrag moves in xe_bo_move() Matthew Brost
2026-11-07 5:12 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 19/33] drm/xe: Skip self-copies for borrowed pages on defrag moves Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 20/33] drm/xe: Add a page defragmentation worker Matthew Brost
2026-11-07 5:27 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 21/33] drm/xe: Add defrag GT stats Matthew Brost
2026-11-09 1:10 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 22/33] drm/xe: Add Kconfig.profile options for BO defrag configuration Matthew Brost
2026-11-09 1:31 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 23/33] drm/xe: Defrag using out-of-lock page preallocation Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 24/33] drm/xe: Add defrag profiling tracepoints Matthew Brost
2026-11-09 4:34 ` Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 25/33] drm/xe: Preallocate system BO backing outside the dma-resv lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 26/33] drm/xe: Add tracepoint for xe_gem_create_ioctl Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 27/33] drm/xe: Add IOVA-based xe_res_cursor variant Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 12:23 ` Matthew Auld
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 28/33] drm/xe: Use IOVA-based DMA mapping for eligible tt BOs Matthew Brost
2026-11-03 19:00 ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-03 20:21 ` Matthew Brost
2026-11-04 11:39 ` Matthew Auld
2026-11-05 3:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 29/33] drm/xe: Add per-device dependency scheduler for IOVA defrag finalize Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 30/33] drm/xe: Add packed copy-step IOVA mapping for defrag Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 31/33] drm/xe: Blit src-natural to dst-packed for defrag-IOVA copies Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 32/33] drm/xe: Finalize defrag-IOVA moves with post-copy job Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 2:56 ` [PATCH v3 33/33] drm/amdgpu: Preallocate system BO pages outside the reservation lock Matthew Brost
2026-07-11 10:46 ` Christian König
2026-07-13 20:24 ` Matthew Brost
2026-07-14 9:17 ` Christian König
2026-07-14 15:15 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avKE9ruZsQwbsQEa@nvishwa1-desk \
--to=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=ryanneph@google.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®