From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: "Jérémy Jean" <Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: fix kexec measurement buffer overflow after failed loads
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 22:07:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avN5hyR2V9C_4GPR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108190404.1397829-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 07:04:04PM +0000, Jérémy Jean wrote:
> When kexec_file_load() fails to install a new image, it can leave the
> global IMA scratch buffer larger than the IMA segment of the current
> image. When that image is executed, ima_update_kexec_buffer() copies
> the larger log past the end of its reserved segment. In a test, KASAN
> reports it as:
...
> Limit the dump to the smaller value between the scratch size and the
> installed image segment size. Update the IMA mapping only after
> machine_kexec_post_load() succeeds.
These are two different bugs and the changelog only explains the first.
The second one is that if machine_kexec_post_load() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM
in trans_pgd on arm64), ima_kexec_buffer is already switched to the
segment of the image that is about to be freed, so the installed image
loses the IMA update and kexec -e writes into freed pages.
Please spell this out, or better split it into a separate patch.
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -206,11 +206,13 @@ kimage_validate_signature(struct kimage *image)
>
> static int kexec_post_load(struct kimage *image, unsigned long flags)
> {
> + int ret = machine_kexec_post_load(image);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> - if (!(flags & KEXEC_FILE_ON_CRASH))
> + if (!ret && !(flags & KEXEC_FILE_ON_CRASH))
> ima_kexec_post_load(image);
> #endif
> - return machine_kexec_post_load(image);
> + return ret;
Nit: an early "if (ret) return ret;" reads better than folding the error
into the IMA condition.
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -98,12 +97,14 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
> + /* A failed replacement load may have resized the scratch buffer. */
> + ima_kexec_file.size = min_t(size_t, ima_kexec_file.size, segment_size);
This prevents the overflow, but it treats the symptom at execute time.
The actual problem is that ima_add_kexec_buffer() updates global state
(ima_kexec_file and kexec_segment_size) for an image that may never be
installed.
When the failed load had a smaller measurement list (with staging the
list can shrink), the dump is still truncated to the failed image's
size and the next kernel gets an incomplete log. kexec_segment_size
reported in the "kexec_execute" event is also the failed image's one.
With the first hunk ima_kexec_post_load() runs only for an image that
is going to be installed, so wouldn't it be cleaner to (re)size the
scratch buffer and kexec_segment_size there, from image->ima_buffer_size?
Then the comment you removed would actually become true.
> @@ -239,7 +240,8 @@ static int ima_update_kexec_buffer(struct notifier_block *self,
> - ret = ima_dump_measurement_list(&buf_size, &buf, kexec_segment_size);
> + ret = ima_dump_measurement_list(&buf_size, &buf,
> + kexec_image->ima_buffer_size);
ima_kexec_buffer is not tied to kexec_image. After a successful
kexec_file_load() followed by KEXEC_FILE_UNLOAD or by a successful
kexec_load(), the old image is freed but ima_kexec_buffer still maps its
pages. kexec_image->ima_buffer_size is 0 for a kexec_load() image, so
with this patch the dump fails, but buf_size is still the header size
and memcpy() writes it into freed pages.
That's pre-existing and not a reason to hold this patch, but it's the
same class of bug and I think IMA should check that ima_kexec_buffer
belongs to kexec_image (or drop the mapping when the image is replaced)
rather than rely on sizes matching.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 19:04 Jérémy Jean
2026-11-10 20:07 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avN5hyR2V9C_4GPR@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®