mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	"Shawn Lin" <Shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Route Root Port AER to a virtual Root Port IRQ
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:02:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avRZanGRks2mtIw0@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dwgbyrulxrbiygjquuyd6cke4i43um7oio4fefey4lfgngwuoe@lkkn7ulwi3vj>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3929 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 11:41:52AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 02:19:46AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 10/20/26 5:10 AM, Koichiro Den wrote:
> > > On R-Car Gen4 SoCs, the APP block exposes the Root Port interrupt
> > > signals in PCIEINTSTS0 and routes them to platform IRQs: AER to
> > > intreq_pcim_lperr, and PME and bandwidth notifications to
> > > intreq_pcim_sub. On an R-Car S4 with GIC ITS, a link retrain set
> > > LnkSta.LBMS and latched PCIEINTSTS0[23] (cfg_bw_mgt_msi), but the Root
> > > Port's MSI never fired while endpoint MSIs worked fine. With iMSI-RX the
> > > Root Port MSI capabilities are already hidden, but its INTx maps to
> > > intreq_pcim_sub. Note that even before this driver took over the IRQ
> > > with rcar_gen4_pcie_msi_irq_handler, the port service was unable to
> > > request it, as the DWC core used that IRQ for its chained MSI handler.
> > > In either case, iMSI-RX or an external MSI controller, Root Port
> > > interrupts are not delivered to the port services.
> > > 
> > > Hide the Root Port MSI/MSI-X capabilities so the port services use
> > > INTx regardless of the MSI controller. Do this in the R-Car host setup,
> > > which also runs on reset and resume. Use a virtual IRQ to deliver
> > > notifications from separate platform IRQs to the standard handlers.
> > > Route AER from the optional "aer" interrupt. DTs without it remain
> > > supported, but Root Port AER stays unavailable.
> > > 
> > > The APP block may still receive MSI-form notifications because hiding
> > > the Root Port's MSI capabilities does not clear MSICAP0.MSIE. Handle
> > > these alongside the INTx-form level signals. Clear the MSI-form latch
> > > before the AER handler clears Root Error Status, so a late APP clear
> > > does not erase a new notification.
> > > 
> > > Check for reset requests before dispatch: on S4, DBI accesses from
> > > the port services can hang the host immediately after link down.
> > > 
> > > The next patch also feeds PME and bandwidth notifications from "msi"
> > > into this IRQ, so both parents may dispatch concurrently.
> > > handle_level_irq() calls irq_ack() before checking whether it can run
> > > the handlers. Keep the APP latches set while the IRQ is in progress or
> > > disabled, so the level parents can retry through the reset checks.
> > > This avoids losing notifications without a raw lock around port
> > > services that take regular spinlocks.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v4:
> > >    - Hide the Root Port MSI/MSI-X capabilities in host_setup() instead of
> > >      adding a no_rp_msi flag to the DWC core. (Shawn)
> > >      https://lore.kernel.org/r/bi3rvyqpdu4iq6pfyrqvx7eplyim6gmg2ijal67mpateobmtlq@gec7zewfm76r/
> > >      I did not carry Marek's Reviewed-by tag over due to the change.
> > 
> > Bjorn/Manivannan, can you please have a look at this patch and the MSI
> > handling, to be sure this is OK ?
> > 
> > (no further comments from me below this point)
> > 
> > Thank you !
> 
> Marek, thanks for the review.
> 
> Bjorn/Mani, just a gentle ping. Could one of you take a look? To summarize:
> 
> - v4 had 'no_rp_msi' flag to the DWC core. Shawn suggested keeping that in the
>   glue driver instead, which I found reasonable:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261015033103.3076869-14-den@valinux.co.jp/
> - v5 hides them in rcar_gen4_pcie_host_setup(). (this patch)
> 
> If you'd rather I send v6 first, rebased on the pp->msi_irq_domain rename Shawn
> and Geert pointed out, please let me know. Otherwise I'll wait for your comments
> before respinning.

As maintainers are usually super-busy, is there another MSI expert we
could ask to offload work from them?

I'd also like to have this series in the next merge window. Thanks
everyone for all the work involved, so far!


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20  3:10 [PATCH v5 00/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Recover from link down and route Root Port interrupts Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] PCI: dwc: Add Renesas to the RAS DES VSEC list Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] PCI: dwc: Factor out the PORT_LINK_DEBUG1 link-up check Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Check live link status in link_up() Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar-gen4: Add optional "aer" interrupt for R-Car Gen4 SoCs Koichiro Den
2026-10-20 12:45   ` Marek Vasut
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] PCI: dwc: Export dw_handle_msi_irq() Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Move deinitialization helpers before SoC initialization Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Assert resets when Gen5 SoC PHY initialization fails Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Separate hardware setup from resource acquisition Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Add Root Port reset support Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] PCI: dwc: Free the MSI domain after the host .deinit() callback Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:54   ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-20  6:41     ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  7:00       ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-20  7:21         ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-20 11:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-10-20 13:45     ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Take over the iMSI-RX interrupt Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Recover the Root Port on link down Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Route Root Port AER to a virtual Root Port IRQ Koichiro Den
2026-10-21  0:19   ` Marek Vasut
2026-11-09  2:41     ` Koichiro Den
2026-11-11 12:02       ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Route Root Port PME and bandwidth notifications Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779f0: Describe the PCIe AER interrupts Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: " Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  3:10 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779h0: Describe the PCIe AER interrupt Koichiro Den
2026-10-20  8:03 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] PCI: rcar-gen4: Recover from link down and route Root Port interrupts Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-10-20  8:45   ` Koichiro Den

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avRZanGRks2mtIw0@ninjato \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=Shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®