From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/idle: Don't handle polling idle as dynticks idle
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:57:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avSeXluNMl_XGPEw@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111114406.346953-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Le Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Marco Crivellari a écrit :
> TS_FLAG_INIDLE tells nohz whether the tick is managed by the idle loop or
> on IRQ exit. With idle=poll it is set while polling, but cpu_idle_poll()
> doesn't run the idle loop again on interrupts: a nohz_full kick or the
> expiry of a stopped tick isn't re-evaluated until something sets
> TIF_NEED_RESCHED. The tick is therefore restarted before polling, and on
> nohz_full CPUs it then keeps running after the wake-up and interrupts
> userspace.
>
> Enter dynticks idle only on the cpuidle path, from cpuidle_idle_call(),
> and leave it before cpu_idle_poll(). While polling, the tick is then
> managed on IRQ exit as for a running task: on nohz_full CPUs it stays
> stopped if possible, and nothing is left to do on wake-up, so the task
> doesn't pay for a tick stop after waking up. On other CPUs, leaving
> dynticks idle restarts the tick as before.
>
> tick_nohz_idle_enter() may now be called on each idle loop iteration and
> always runs with interrupts disabled; tick_nohz_idle_exit() may be called
> outside dynticks idle and with interrupts disabled.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aQiWfnnSzxsnwa2o@tpad/
> Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 11:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop the idle tick on polling idle on nohz_full CPUs Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] tick/nohz: Re-evaluate the tick on return to user space Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 16:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/idle: Don't handle polling idle as dynticks idle Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 16:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-11-11 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] tick/nohz: Remove tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick() Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 16:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: no_hz: Add tick stop in polling idle Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 17:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avSeXluNMl_XGPEw@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®