From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 10:31:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avYF8fZqDhizgpN7@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103041134.33310-6-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 12:11:34PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
> An RX batch can make a socket readable while the RX worker retains its
> socket lock. Waking a blocked reader before release_sock() merely makes it
> wait for the same lock.
>
> P4 coalesces native sk_write_space notifications while retaining their
> under-lock callback context. This patch also coalesces native sk_data_ready
> notifications and moves both callbacks after release_sock(), so awakened
> tasks do not immediately block on the RX worker's socket lock.
>
> Save the native data-ready callback before the AF_VSOCK socket is
> published. Batch only while the native protocol and both native readiness
> callbacks are present and no psock is observed under sk_callback_lock. A
> socket with a replacement callback continues down the existing per-packet
> path.
>
> At batch finish, deliver write-space before data-ready and hold the
> connected lookup reference until both callbacks return. Packets admitted on
> the native path continue to use their saved native callbacks. Loading a
> current sockmap callback at finish would not serialize its invocation
> against sockmap teardown and could lose the native wakeup or invoke a stale
> data-ready wrapper.
>
> Extract the data-ready predicate from vsock_data_ready() so the deferred
> and regular paths share the low-watermark test.
>
> Performance:
>
> P4-P5 contribution (P1-P3 vs P1-P5):
>
> End-to-end RX throughput (64K Guest recv() size, SO_RCVLOWAT=1; Gbit/s):
>
> payload P1-P3 RX P1-P5 RX throughput change (95% CI)
> (Gbit/s) (Gbit/s)
> 64B 0.2449 0.2463 +0.55% [-3.86%, +5.17%]
> 256B 0.9649 0.9931 +2.93% [+0.83%, +5.07%]
> 512B 1.8205 1.8260 +0.30% [-4.27%, +5.10%]
> 1K 3.3431 3.3420 -0.03% [-2.15%, +2.12%]
> 4K 5.6541 5.8428 +3.34% [+1.10%, +5.63%]
> 8K 5.4280 5.3364 -1.69% [-15.55%, +14.46%]
> 16K 5.5935 5.6701 +1.37% [-1.41%, +4.23%]
> 64K 5.6917 5.8351 +2.52% [-0.20%, +5.31%]
>
> Fixed-syscall stress test (receiver recv() size = sender write size;
> Gbit/s):
>
> payload P1-P3 RX P1-P5 RX throughput change (95% CI)
> recv() calls are listed as P1-P3/P1-P5.
> 64B 0.2553 0.2575 +0.87% [-3.68%, +5.63%]
> 1048577/1048577
> 256B 0.9069 0.9183 +1.26% [-3.96%, +6.76%]
> 1048577/1048577
> 512B 1.6048 1.6459 +2.56% [+0.98%, +4.18%]
> 1048577/1048577
> 1K 2.6939 2.7357 +1.55% [-1.35%, +4.54%]
> 1048577/1048577
> 4K 4.9168 4.9678 +1.04% [-1.84%, +4.00%]
> 524965/525283
> 8K 5.1476 5.2005 +1.03% [-4.02%, +6.34%]
> 262926/263156
> 16K 5.5964 5.6609 +1.15% [-2.86%, +5.33%]
> 131311/131475
> 64K 5.9439 5.9073 -0.62% [-3.00%, +1.83%]
> 32875/32937
>
> Guest CPU1 aggregate cycles per received byte
> (fixed 64K receiver, with perf):
>
> payload P1-P3 P1-P5 change (95% CI)
> 64B 60.281 58.258 -3.36% [-8.74%, +2.35%]
> 256B 14.242 13.648 -4.17% [-9.81%, +1.82%]
> 512B 7.547 7.211 -4.45% [-9.73%, +1.13%]
> 1K 3.987 3.853 -3.35% [-8.52%, +2.12%]
> 4K 1.983 1.880 -5.17% [-7.97%, -2.27%]
> 8K 1.665 1.620 -2.75% [-9.03%, +3.96%]
> 16K 1.409 1.346 -4.52% [-10.94%, +2.37%]
> 64K 1.322 1.281 -3.11% [-6.49%, +0.38%]
>
> Full-series cycles/B (baseline vs P1-P5):
>
> Guest CPU1 aggregate cycles per received byte
> (fixed 64K receiver, with perf):
>
> payload baseline P1-P5 change (95% CI)
> 64B 65.282 57.843 -11.40% [-13.77%, -8.95%]
> 256B 14.710 13.813 -6.10% [ -7.89%, -4.28%]
> 512B 7.709 7.188 -6.75% [ -8.79%, -4.66%]
> 1K 4.075 3.862 -5.23% [ -6.80%, -3.63%]
> 4K 2.034 1.887 -7.21% [ -8.67%, -5.72%]
> 8K 1.664 1.568 -5.78% [ -7.83%, -3.69%]
> 16K 1.450 1.385 -4.48% [ -6.08%, -2.86%]
> 64K 1.338 1.317 -1.51% [ -3.21%, +0.22%]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++-
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 9 +++--
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 27 ++++++++++---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 52 +++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> Tested:
> Concurrent map-entry attach/detach during sequenced RX and duplex traffic
> passed on baseline, P1-P3, P1-P4, and P1-P5. The active SK_PASS case also
> passed on each state, with 200,000 verdict invocations. The concurrent
> SK_PASS attach/detach case completed 1,000 insert/remove pairs per state;
> its 10,000-record suffix after the final detach was verified. No kernel
> diagnostic markers were found in successful runs.
>
> Sockmap may replace sk_data_ready and sk_write_space. With non-native
> callbacks, native RX batching must be declined and the ordinary per-packet
> receive path used. The active SK_PASS case covers the condition expected to
> trigger this fallback. The test does not trace each packet's internal
> branch, so it verifies the fallback scenario without asserting that every
> packet took that branch.
>
> The duplex cases exercised write-space backpressure: the guest's nonblocking
> send reached EAGAIN while the host was not reading. After the host began
> draining data, the guest observed POLLOUT and resumed sending. Counts below
> are observed EAGAIN/POLLOUT recoveries.
>
> Test / result baseline P1-P3 P1-P4 P1-P5
> No-verdict RX churn: attach/detach pairs 433493 455507 430985 380351
> No-verdict duplex: attach/detach pairs 229793 212410 214198 148755
> No-verdict duplex: EAGAIN/POLLOUT 365/365 266/266 264/264 443/443
> Active SK_PASS: EAGAIN/POLLOUT 2548/2548 3013/3013 3093/3093 4208/4208
> SK_PASS attach/detach: intervals with verdict progress 705 616 631 692
> SK_PASS attach/detach: verdict invocations 99747 99894 97475 82409
> Post-detach SK_PASS suffix 10,000/10,000 records per run
I'd probably shorten the long description.
I wonder if the sockmap tests in the bpf selftests cover some of these
scenarios and coulde be extended for vsock?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index bf28e8e32e280..2aa0e81e655d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -287,14 +287,15 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> * Initialize a batch to zero before use. A non-empty batch owns @sk's socket
> * lock and the reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). The
> * caller retains both until it calls virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(). An
> - * empty batch owns neither. A pending native write-space notification belongs
> - * to the lock holder and is delivered by virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish().
> + * empty batch owns neither. Pending native readiness notifications belong to
> + * the lock holder and are delivered by virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish().
> */
> struct virtio_transport_rx_batch {
> struct sock *sk;
> unsigned int pkts;
> size_t bytes;
> bool write_space_pending;
> + bool data_ready_pending;
> };
>
> static inline bool
> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> index b76ab565ea58b..57ee545fdb496 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> @@ -64,9 +64,10 @@ struct vsock_sock {
> bool sent_request;
> bool ignore_connecting_rst;
> /*
> - * Captured before the socket is published. This identifies AF_VSOCK's
> - * native write-space callback after a consumer has replaced it.
> + * Captured before the socket is published. These identify AF_VSOCK's
> + * native readiness callbacks after a consumer has replaced them.
> */
> + void (*native_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
> void (*native_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
>
> /* Protected by lock_sock(sk) */
> @@ -83,7 +84,9 @@ s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> struct sock *vsock_create_connected(struct sock *parent);
> void vsock_data_ready(struct sock *sk);
> -bool vsock_write_space_is_native(const struct sock *sk);
> +bool vsock_data_ready_pending(struct sock *sk);
> +bool vsock_callbacks_are_native(const struct sock *sk);
> +void vsock_call_native_data_ready(struct sock *sk);
> void vsock_call_native_write_space(struct sock *sk);
>
> /**** TRANSPORT ****/
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index e39567990539f..0617073e99ed8 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -958,6 +958,7 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
> sk->sk_type = type;
>
> vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> + vsk->native_data_ready = sk->sk_data_ready;
> vsk->native_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
> vsock_addr_init(&vsk->local_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
> vsock_addr_init(&vsk->remote_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
> @@ -1113,24 +1114,38 @@ s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_space);
>
> -void vsock_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> +bool vsock_data_ready_pending(struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>
> - if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= sk->sk_rcvlowat ||
> - sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
> + return vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) >= sk->sk_rcvlowat ||
> + sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_data_ready_pending);
> +
> +void vsock_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + if (vsock_data_ready_pending(sk))
> sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_data_ready);
>
> -bool vsock_write_space_is_native(const struct sock *sk)
> +bool vsock_callbacks_are_native(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> const struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>
> - return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_write_space) ==
> + return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_data_ready) ==
> + READ_ONCE(vsk->native_data_ready) &&
> + READ_ONCE(sk->sk_write_space) ==
> READ_ONCE(vsk->native_write_space);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_write_space_is_native);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_callbacks_are_native);
> +
> +void vsock_call_native_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + vsock_sk(sk)->native_data_ready(sk);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_call_native_data_ready);
>
> void vsock_call_native_write_space(struct sock *sk)
> {
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index af26344678e41..9d02e81042c21 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -1598,7 +1598,8 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>
> static int
> virtio_transport_recv_connected(struct sock *sk,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + bool *data_ready_pending)
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> @@ -1617,7 +1618,12 @@ virtio_transport_recv_connected(struct sock *sk,
> vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
> break;
> }
> - vsock_data_ready(sk);
> + if (data_ready_pending) {
> + if (!*data_ready_pending && vsock_data_ready_pending(sk))
> + *data_ready_pending = true;
> + } else {
> + vsock_data_ready(sk);
> + }
> return err;
> case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST:
> virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk);
> @@ -1874,20 +1880,19 @@ __virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
> return false;
>
> /*
> - * Sockmap can replace sk_prot or sk_write_space, and publish a psock,
> - * without the socket lock. Coalescing is safe only for the native
> - * write-space callback, so a boundary that sees a replacement returns to
> - * the existing per-packet path.
> + * Sockmap can replace sk_prot or either readiness callback, and publish a
> + * psock, without the socket lock. Coalescing is safe only for native
> + * callbacks, so a boundary that sees a replacement returns to the existing
> + * per-packet path.
> */
> return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) == sk->sk_prot_creator &&
> - vsock_write_space_is_native(sk) &&
> + vsock_callbacks_are_native(sk) &&
It'd be nice to avoid inter-patch churn.
> !virtio_transport_sock_has_psock(sk);
> }
>
> /*
> - * Sockmap teardown restores the native protocol and write-space callback
> - * under sk_callback_lock. Serialize each packet admission check with those
> - * updates.
> + * Sockmap teardown restores the native protocol and callbacks under
> + * sk_callback_lock. Serialize each packet admission check with those updates.
> */
> static bool
> virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
> @@ -1905,9 +1910,8 @@ virtio_transport_rx_batch_can_receive(struct virtio_transport *t,
> /*
> * The caller holds sk's socket lock. If @batchable is non-NULL, update it
> * after processing @skb to say whether a native STREAM/RW batch can continue.
> - * When @batch is non-NULL, record a native write-space notification for batch
> - * finish. A writer cannot consume the updated credit until this lock is
> - * released.
> + * When @batch is non-NULL, record native readiness notifications for batch
> + * finish. A reader or writer cannot make progress until this lock is released.
> */
> static void
> virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> @@ -1917,6 +1921,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> + bool *data_ready_pending;
> struct sockaddr_vm src;
> bool space_available;
>
> @@ -1926,6 +1931,8 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> if (batchable)
> *batchable = false;
>
> + data_ready_pending = batch ? &batch->data_ready_pending : NULL;
> +
> /*
> * The socket may have been closed or reassigned after lookup but before
> * its socket lock was acquired. Listener sockets have no assigned
> @@ -1962,7 +1969,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> kfree_skb(skb);
> break;
> case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
> - virtio_transport_recv_connected(sk, skb);
> + virtio_transport_recv_connected(sk, skb, data_ready_pending);
> break;
> case TCP_CLOSING:
> virtio_transport_recv_disconnecting(sk, skb);
> @@ -2036,32 +2043,37 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_recv_pkt);
>
> /*
> * Release an active RX batch. A non-empty batch holds the socket lock and the
> - * reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). Deliver any
> - * deferred native write-space notification while holding the lock, preserving
> - * the callback context of the regular receive path. An empty batch holds
> - * neither.
> + * reference returned by vsock_find_connected_socket_net(). Release the lock,
> + * deliver deferred native write-space and data-ready notifications in that
> + * order, then drop the reference. An empty batch holds neither.
> */
> void virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch)
> {
> bool write_space_pending = batch->write_space_pending;
> + bool data_ready_pending = batch->data_ready_pending;
> struct sock *sk = batch->sk;
>
> batch->sk = NULL;
> batch->pkts = 0;
> batch->bytes = 0;
> batch->write_space_pending = false;
> + batch->data_ready_pending = false;
>
> if (!sk)
> return;
>
> + release_sock(sk);
> +
> /*
> - * The packet was admitted with the native callback. Do not reload a current
> + * Packets were admitted with native callbacks. Do not reload a current
> * callback here: sockmap can replace or remove its wrapper independently.
> */
> if (write_space_pending)
> vsock_call_native_write_space(sk);
>
> - release_sock(sk);
> + if (data_ready_pending)
> + vsock_call_native_data_ready(sk);
> +
> sock_put(sk);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish);
> --
> 2.53.0
I think all of this goes away if we support batching in the read_skb()
call? That is how TCP does it, and they coalesce the sk_data_ready()
call until after processing a batch I think. This way they don't have to
drop out if the callback changes.
I think this is probably okay for this series, but long term I wouldn't
mind seeing the data ready ptr stuff get reverted, and read_skb()
batching + coalesced sk_data_ready implemented instead.
Best,
Bobby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 4:11 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:04 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] vsock/virtio: factor RX skb metadata budget check Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:06 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-11-04 19:26 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-11-05 8:16 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-05 8:57 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:27 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-12 16:25 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce native RX write-space notifications Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:21 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 12:49 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-12 17:23 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-11-03 4:11 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-11-05 9:38 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-11-06 13:33 ` Jia Jia
2026-11-12 18:31 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-23 7:51 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-23 7:51 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer native RX readiness notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avYF8fZqDhizgpN7@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com \
--to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®