mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: Cpp Code <cpp.code.lv@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pshelar@ovn.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	ovs dev <dev@openvswitch.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: openvswitch: IPv6: Add IPv6 extension header support
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:21:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b091ef39-dc29-8362-4d31-0a9cc498e8ea@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAASuNyVe8z1R6xyCfSAxZbcrL3dej1n8TXXkqS-e8QvA6eWd+w@mail.gmail.com>

Le 30/09/2021 à 18:11, Cpp Code a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:19 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 08:19:05 +0200 Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>>> /* Insert a kernel only KEY_ATTR */
>>>> #define OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUNNEL_INFO    __OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
>>>> #undef OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
>>>> #define OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX            __OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
>>> Following the other thread [1], this will break if a new app runs over an old
>>> kernel.
>>
>> Good point.
>>
>>> Why not simply expose this attribute to userspace and throw an error if a
>>> userspace app uses it?
>>
>> Does it matter if it's exposed or not? Either way the parsing policy
>> for attrs coming from user space should have a reject for the value.
>> (I say that not having looked at the code, so maybe I shouldn't...)
> 
> To remove some confusion, there are some architectural nuances if we
> want to extend code without large refactor.
> The ovs_key_attr is defined only in kernel side. Userspace side is
> generated from this file. As well the code can be built without kernel
> modules.
> The code inside OVS repository and net-next is not identical, but I
> try to keep some consistency.
I didn't get why OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUNNEL_INFO cannot be exposed to userspace.

> 
> JFYI This is the file responsible for generating userspace part:
> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/build-aux/extract-odp-netlink-h
> This is the how corresponding file for ovs_key_attr looks inside OVS:
> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/openvswitch.h
> one can see there are more values than in net-next version.
There are still some '#ifdef __KERNEL__'. The standard 'make headers_install'
filters them. Why not using this standard mechanism?

In this file, there are two attributes (OVS_KEY_ATTR_PACKET_TYPE and
OVS_KEY_ATTR_ND_EXTENSIONS) that doesn't exist in the kernel.
This will also breaks if an old app runs over a new kernel. I don't see how it
is possible to keep the compat between {old|new} {kernel|app}.


Regards,
Nicolas

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28 19:47 Toms Atteka
2021-09-29  0:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29  6:19   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2021-09-29 13:19     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-30 16:11       ` Cpp Code
2021-10-01  7:21         ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2021-10-01 20:42           ` Cpp Code
2021-10-05  6:41             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2021-10-14 21:12               ` Cpp Code
2021-10-15 13:52                 ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2021-09-30 16:12   ` Cpp Code

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b091ef39-dc29-8362-4d31-0a9cc498e8ea@6wind.com \
    --to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=cpp.code.lv@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®