From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Toms Atteka <cpp.code.lv@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pshelar@ovn.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: openvswitch: IPv6: Add IPv6 extension header support
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 08:19:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1e5b178-47f5-9791-73e9-0c1f805b0fca@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928174853.06fe8e66@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Le 29/09/2021 à 02:48, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:47:27 -0700 Toms Atteka wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
>> index a87b44cd5590..dc6eb5f6399f 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
>> @@ -346,6 +346,13 @@ enum ovs_key_attr {
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUNNEL_INFO, /* struct ip_tunnel_info */
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#ifndef __KERNEL__
>
> #else
>
>> + PADDING, /* Padding so kernel and non kernel field count would match */
>
> The name PADDING seems rather risky, collisions will be likely.
> OVS_KEY_ATTR_PADDING maybe?
>
> But maybe we don't need to define this special value and bake it into
> the uAPI, why can't we add something like this to the kernel header
> (i.e. include/linux/openvswitch.h):
>
> /* Insert a kernel only KEY_ATTR */
> #define OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUNNEL_INFO __OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
> #undef OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
> #define OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX __OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX
Following the other thread [1], this will break if a new app runs over an old
kernel.
Why not simply expose this attribute to userspace and throw an error if a
userspace app uses it?
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAASuNyUWoZ1wToEUYbdehux=yVnWQ=suKDyRkQfRD-72DOLziw@mail.gmail.com/
>
>> +#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 19:47 Toms Atteka
2021-09-29 0:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 6:19 ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2021-09-29 13:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-30 16:11 ` Cpp Code
2021-10-01 7:21 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2021-10-01 20:42 ` Cpp Code
2021-10-05 6:41 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2021-10-14 21:12 ` Cpp Code
2021-10-15 13:52 ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2021-09-30 16:12 ` Cpp Code
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1e5b178-47f5-9791-73e9-0c1f805b0fca@6wind.com \
--to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=cpp.code.lv@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®