From: "michael chang" <thenewme91@gmail.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: "Stephen Clark" <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>,
"ck list" <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:56:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b14e81f00703101356s248bd914m91c26e2d22e507d4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070310191118.GL943@1wt.eu>
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> 2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before
the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his
work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to
2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)
That said, being able to easily apply it to the latest stable kernel
would probably increase adoption, yes. I will agree with that much.
--
~Mike
- Just the crazy copy cat.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-10 7:45 Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 18:09 ` Stephen Clark
2007-03-10 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-10 21:56 ` michael chang [this message]
2007-03-10 22:11 ` [ck] " Willy Tarreau
2007-03-10 22:26 ` michael chang
2007-03-10 23:54 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 0:43 ` [ck] " Thibaut VARENE
2007-03-11 0:44 ` Thibaut VARENE
2007-03-10 18:15 ` RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20 -> backport to 2.6.18.8 Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b14e81f00703101356s248bd914m91c26e2d22e507d4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=thenewme91@gmail.com \
--cc=Stephen.Clark@seclark.us \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®