Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20

["michael chang" <thenewme91@gmail.com>]

On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> > On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> > >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> > >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
>           ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
> > exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before
> > the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his
> > work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to
> > 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)
>
> You see the words I have underlined ? "next time". I know for sure he
> published it before 2.6.20.2, but now that it is out, I suggested that
> Con rebases his work on this version for new releases.
>

Oh. That's my mistake, then. That makes sense. To me, it sounded like
you were implying he was supposed to base it on 2.6.20.2 in advance,
for some reason. *sigh*

-- 
~Mike
 - Just the crazy copy cat.