Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption

["Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 992 bytes --]

Out of current discussion I tried using s2ram on patched kernel (I didnot try s2ram earlier, my problem was (un)plugging HDMI - some ACPIcode probably).
Corruption output is quite huge, I attached it to bug report:http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17526

I do not know much about current discussion and fact if checking forcorruption should be enabled by default.
However, please note that end-user will not able to diagnose thatLinux doesn't work on his machine because of less-or-more broken BIOS.He will not get to know that he needs to enablebios_corruption_check=1 and edit grub to make it default.
I understand that disabling chunk of RAM on every, even not affected,machine is far from perfect, but we have to remember about notadvanced end-users.
-- RafaÅ‚ MiÅ‚eckiÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥