Re: [RFC PATCH v3 07/17] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable ABMC feature

["Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>]

Hi Peter,

On 4/4/24 12:36, Peter Newman wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:16 AM Moger, Babu <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/3/24 19:30, Peter Newman wrote:
>>> This looks like it would move to fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c where it's not
>>> possible to dereference an rdt_hw_resource struct.
>>>
>>> It might be helpful to try building your changes on top of James's
>>> change[1] to get an idea of how this would fit in post-refactoring.
>>> I'll stop pointing out inconsistencies with his portability scheme
>>> now.
>>
>> Considering the complexity of James changes, I was hoping my series will
>> go first. It would be difficult for me to make changes based on transient
>> patch series. I would think it would be best to base the patches based on
>> tip/master.
> 
> I don't need you to push the patches to the mailing list based on
> James's series. I was just asking you to try building locally on top
> of the refactoring changes. You are putting in the effort trying to
> make this code portable (i.e., inventing new
> resctrl_arch_-interfaces), so it would be sensible to check your work
> locally.

I am really no focusing much on  portability in this series.
I named it to match it with resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled.
Yes. I got your concerns. I will plan check against James changes in next
revision.

> 
> However, I am the main stakeholder who cares about MPAM and ABMC
> working in the same kernel, so I can continue to give feedback on
> portability as I compose the series' together.

Agree. Please continue your feedback.
-- 
Thanks
Babu Moger