From: Amrit Anand <quic_amrianan@quicinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <agross@kernel.org>,
<andersson@kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>,
Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwinfo: Introduce board-id
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:12:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4c27fb4-0cbf-7bad-3fc3-163fb4a5eb3f@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fc9815e-76dd-41d7-aa1a-caa72ef4ad34@linaro.org>
On 1/23/2024 5:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/01/2024 12:20, Amrit Anand wrote:
>> From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
>>
>
>
>> How is this better than Qualcomm's qcom,msm-id/qcom,board-id?
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> The selection process for devicetrees was Qualcomm-specific and not
>> useful for other devices and bootloaders that were not developed by
>> Qualcomm because a complex algorithm was used to implement. Board-ids
>> provide a matching solution that can be implemented by bootloaders
>> without introducing vendor-specific code. Qualcomm uses three
>> devicetree properties: msm-id (interchangeably: soc-id), board-id, and
>> pmic-id. This does not scale well for use casese which use identifiers,
>> for example, to distinguish between a display panel. For a display
>> panel, an approach could be to add a new property: display-id,
>> but now bootloaders need to be updated to also read this property. We
>> want to avoid requiring to update bootloaders with new hardware
> Some mis-indentation in two lines above.
Sure will take care of this.
>
>> identifiers: a bootloader need only recognize the identifiers it can
>> handle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amrit Anand <quic_amrianan@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/board-id.yaml | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/board-id.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/board-id.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/board-id.yaml
> I think we should add it to dtschema, because bootloaders are using these.
Do you want us to move this file completely to the below mentioned repo
and under which directory?
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema
>
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..82d5ff7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwinfo/board-id.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwinfo/board-id.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Board Identifier for Devicetree Selection
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Amrit Anand <quic_amrianan@quicinc.com>
>> + - Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
>> +
>> +description: |
> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
Will drop it.
>
>> + Device manufacturers frequently ship multiple boards under a single
>> + software package. These software packages will ship multiple devicetree
>> + blobs and require some mechanism to pick the correct DTB for the board
>> + the software package was deployed. board-id provides a mechanism for
>> + bootloaders to select the appropriate DTB which is vendor/OEM-agnostic.
>> +
>> +select:
>> + anyOf:
>> + - required:
>> + - 'board-id'
>> + - required:
>> + - 'board-id-types'
>> + - required:
>> + - '#board-id-cells'
> I don't fully get why do you need this select. Isn't the schema selected
> by nodename? Or maybe it is for the final required: but then this could
> be just set of dependencies.
The nodename here would be "/". So it will be applied to all the DTs, right?
Here, we wanted this to apply only if the above mentioned properties are
present.
Do you suggest moving this to qcom,board-id.yaml and the required: as well.
So that vendor specific yaml could be applied?
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + $nodename:
>> + const: "/"
> Blank line.
Will add it.
>> + board-id:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
>> + description: |
> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
Ack
>> + A list of identifiers that can be used to match with this devicetree.
> s/devicetree/Devicetree/ ?
Will update
>> + The interpretatation of each cell can be matched with the
> Typo: interpretation
Will update
>> + board-id-type at the same index.
>> +
>> + board-id-types:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/non-unique-string-array
>> + description:
>> + Defines the type of each cell, indicating to the DeviceTree selection
> s/DeviceTree/Devicetree/ ?
Will update
>
>> + mechanism how to parse the board-id.
>> +
>> + '#board-id-cells':
> What are the cells for?
Bootloader will use this to check the number of entries in a tuple of
board-id.
Vendors can have different logic in bootloader to specify the number
So wanted to make it flexible.
Thanks,
Amrit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-20 11:20 [PATCH 0/2] Add board-id support for multiple DT selection Amrit Anand
2024-01-20 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwinfo: Introduce board-id Amrit Anand
2024-01-20 12:36 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-20 19:10 ` Trilok Soni
2024-01-22 10:10 ` Amrit Anand
2024-01-23 11:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-23 17:18 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-23 18:51 ` Elliot Berman
2024-01-23 20:05 ` Trilok Soni
2024-01-24 12:44 ` Amrit Anand
2024-01-23 12:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-24 12:42 ` Amrit Anand [this message]
2024-01-25 10:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-24 15:00 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-20 11:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: hwinfo: Add Qualcomm's board-id types Amrit Anand
2024-01-20 12:36 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-20 13:32 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-22 10:07 ` Amrit Anand
2024-01-22 18:10 ` Elliot Berman
2024-01-22 19:27 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-01-24 12:47 ` Amrit Anand
2024-01-21 2:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-22 18:12 ` Elliot Berman
2024-01-20 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] Add board-id support for multiple DT selection Konrad Dybcio
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Elliot Berman
2024-01-24 14:56 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-02 5:00 ` Amrit Anand
2024-02-14 12:56 ` Amrit Anand
2024-02-14 13:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4c27fb4-0cbf-7bad-3fc3-163fb4a5eb3f@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_amrianan@quicinc.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®