* Re: [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
@ 2018-09-05 9:08 Chuan Hua, Lei
2018-09-05 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chuan Hua, Lei @ 2018-09-05 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Tatashin; +Cc: linux-kernel, x86
> static unsigned long __init get_loops_per_jiffy(void)
> {
> unsigned long lpj = tsc_khz * KHZ;
>
> do_div(lpj, HZ);
> return lpj;
> }
Just tried this with 4.19-rc2 on x86(32bit). lpj return as zero which is not expected
After disassembling the code,
0xc1239a9e <+199>: imul $0x3e8,0xc12296e4,%edx
0xc1239aa8 <+209>: xor %ecx,%ecx
0xc1239aaa <+211>: test %edx,%edx
0xc1239aac <+213>: mov %eax,%ebx
0xc1239aae <+215>: je 0xc1239abd <tsc_init+230>
0xc1239ab0 <+217>: mov $0x64,%ecx
0xc1239ab5 <+222>: mov %edx,%eax
0xc1239ab7 <+224>: xor %edx,%edx
0xc1239ab9 <+226>: div %ecx
0xc1239abb <+228>: mov %eax,%ecx
0xc1239abd <+230>: mov %ebx,%eax
0xc1239abf <+232>: mov $0x64,%ebx
0xc1239ac4 <+237>: div %ebx
0xc1239ac6 <+239>: mov %ecx,%edx
imul will load the result into %edx, %edx supposed to be high 32 bit which is not zero,
It should be zero in this case. both lpj and tsc_khz should be u64 to work properly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
2018-09-05 9:08 [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once Chuan Hua, Lei
@ 2018-09-05 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2018-09-05 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuan Hua, Lei; +Cc: Pavel Tatashin, linux-kernel, x86
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Chuan Hua, Lei wrote:
> > static unsigned long __init get_loops_per_jiffy(void)
> > {
> > unsigned long lpj = tsc_khz * KHZ;
> >
> > do_div(lpj, HZ);
> > return lpj;
> > }
> Just tried this with 4.19-rc2 on x86(32bit). lpj return as zero which is not
> expected
> After disassembling the code,
> 0xc1239a9e <+199>: imul $0x3e8,0xc12296e4,%edx
> 0xc1239aa8 <+209>: xor %ecx,%ecx
> 0xc1239aaa <+211>: test %edx,%edx
> 0xc1239aac <+213>: mov %eax,%ebx
> 0xc1239aae <+215>: je 0xc1239abd <tsc_init+230>
> 0xc1239ab0 <+217>: mov $0x64,%ecx
> 0xc1239ab5 <+222>: mov %edx,%eax
> 0xc1239ab7 <+224>: xor %edx,%edx
> 0xc1239ab9 <+226>: div %ecx
> 0xc1239abb <+228>: mov %eax,%ecx
> 0xc1239abd <+230>: mov %ebx,%eax
> 0xc1239abf <+232>: mov $0x64,%ebx
> 0xc1239ac4 <+237>: div %ebx
> 0xc1239ac6 <+239>: mov %ecx,%edx
> imul will load the result into %edx, %edx supposed to be high 32 bit which is
> not zero,
> It should be zero in this case. both lpj and tsc_khz should be u64 to work
> properly.
Good catch! Care to send a patch?
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once
2018-07-19 20:55 [PATCH v15 00/26] Early boot time stamps Pavel Tatashin
@ 2018-07-19 20:55 ` Pavel Tatashin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Tatashin @ 2018-07-19 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: steven.sistare, daniel.m.jordan, linux, schwidefsky,
heiko.carstens, john.stultz, sboyd, x86, linux-kernel, mingo,
tglx, hpa, douly.fnst, peterz, prarit, feng.tang, pmladek,
gnomes, linux-s390, pasha.tatashin, boris.ostrovsky, jgross,
pbonzini
During boot tsc is calibrated twice: once in tsc_early_delay_calibrate(),
and the second time in tsc_init().
Rename tsc_early_delay_calibrate() to tsc_early_init(), and rework it so
the calibration is done only early, and make tsc_init() to use the values
already determined in tsc_early_init().
Sometimes it is not possible to determine tsc early, as the subsystem that
is required is not yet initialized, in such case try again later in
tsc_init().
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
index 2701d221583a..c4368ff73652 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline cycles_t get_cycles(void)
extern struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(u64 art);
extern struct system_counterval_t convert_art_ns_to_tsc(u64 art_ns);
-extern void tsc_early_delay_calibrate(void);
+extern void tsc_early_init(void);
extern void tsc_init(void);
extern void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reason);
extern int unsynchronized_tsc(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 7490de925a81..5d32c55aeb8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1014,6 +1014,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
*/
init_hypervisor_platform();
+ tsc_early_init();
x86_init.resources.probe_roms();
/* after parse_early_param, so could debug it */
@@ -1199,7 +1200,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
memblock_find_dma_reserve();
- tsc_early_delay_calibrate();
if (!early_xdbc_setup_hardware())
early_xdbc_register_console();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 186395041725..4cab2236169e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_khz);
unsigned int __read_mostly tsc_khz;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tsc_khz);
+#define KHZ 1000
+
/*
* TSC can be unstable due to cpufreq or due to unsynced TSCs
*/
@@ -1335,34 +1337,10 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
*/
device_initcall(init_tsc_clocksource);
-void __init tsc_early_delay_calibrate(void)
-{
- unsigned long lpj;
-
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
- return;
-
- cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
- tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
-
- tsc_khz = tsc_khz ? : cpu_khz;
- if (!tsc_khz)
- return;
-
- lpj = tsc_khz * 1000;
- do_div(lpj, HZ);
- loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
-}
-
-void __init tsc_init(void)
+static bool __init determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies(void)
{
- u64 lpj, cyc;
- int cpu;
-
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER);
- return;
- }
+ /* Make sure that cpu and tsc are not already calibrated */
+ WARN_ON(cpu_khz || tsc_khz);
cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
@@ -1377,20 +1355,52 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
else if (abs(cpu_khz - tsc_khz) * 10 > tsc_khz)
cpu_khz = tsc_khz;
- if (!tsc_khz) {
- mark_tsc_unstable("could not calculate TSC khz");
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER);
- return;
- }
+ if (tsc_khz == 0)
+ return false;
pr_info("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz processor\n",
- (unsigned long)cpu_khz / 1000,
- (unsigned long)cpu_khz % 1000);
+ (unsigned long)cpu_khz / KHZ,
+ (unsigned long)cpu_khz % KHZ);
if (cpu_khz != tsc_khz) {
pr_info("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz TSC",
- (unsigned long)tsc_khz / 1000,
- (unsigned long)tsc_khz % 1000);
+ (unsigned long)tsc_khz / KHZ,
+ (unsigned long)tsc_khz % KHZ);
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+static unsigned long __init get_loops_per_jiffy(void)
+{
+ unsigned long lpj = tsc_khz * KHZ;
+
+ do_div(lpj, HZ);
+ return lpj;
+}
+
+void __init tsc_early_init(void)
+{
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
+ return;
+ if (!determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies())
+ return;
+ loops_per_jiffy = get_loops_per_jiffy();
+}
+
+void __init tsc_init(void)
+{
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!tsc_khz) {
+ /* We failed to determine frequencies earlier, try again */
+ if (!determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies()) {
+ mark_tsc_unstable("could not calculate TSC khz");
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER);
+ return;
+ }
}
/* Sanitize TSC ADJUST before cyc2ns gets initialized */
@@ -1413,10 +1423,7 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
if (!no_sched_irq_time)
enable_sched_clock_irqtime();
- lpj = ((u64)tsc_khz * 1000);
- do_div(lpj, HZ);
- lpj_fine = lpj;
-
+ lpj_fine = get_loops_per_jiffy();
use_tsc_delay();
check_system_tsc_reliable();
--
2.18.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-05 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-05 9:08 [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once Chuan Hua, Lei
2018-09-05 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-19 20:55 [PATCH v15 00/26] Early boot time stamps Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-19 20:55 ` [PATCH v15 19/26] x86/tsc: calibrate tsc only once Pavel Tatashin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®