mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@ornl.gov>
To: "'Dan Carpenter'" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com>,
	James Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	"HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org>,
	"lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: RE: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 2/3] staging:lustre: remove kernel defines in userland headers
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:12:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5d34de937b54607b8c8f715bfade82a@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150522130019.GN4150@mwanda>


>>  typedef struct lnet_peer {
>> -	struct list_head	lp_hashlist;	  /* chain on peer hash */
>> -	struct list_head	lp_txq;	       /* messages blocking for tx credits */
>> -	struct list_head	lp_rtrq;	      /* messages blocking for router credits */
>> -	struct list_head	lp_rtr_list;	  /* chain on router list */
>> -	int	       lp_txcredits;	 /* # tx credits available */
>> -	int	       lp_mintxcredits;      /* low water mark */
>> -	int	       lp_rtrcredits;	/* # router credits */
>> -	int	       lp_minrtrcredits;     /* low water mark */
>> -	unsigned int      lp_alive:1;	   /* alive/dead? */
>> -	unsigned int      lp_notify:1;	  /* notification outstanding? */
>> -	unsigned int      lp_notifylnd:1;       /* outstanding notification for LND? */
>> -	unsigned int      lp_notifying:1;       /* some thread is handling notification */
>> -	unsigned int      lp_ping_notsent;      /* SEND event outstanding from ping */
>> -	int	       lp_alive_count;       /* # times router went dead<->alive */
>> -	long	      lp_txqnob;	    /* bytes queued for sending */
>> -	unsigned long	lp_timestamp;	 /* time of last aliveness news */
>> -	unsigned long	lp_ping_timestamp;    /* time of last ping attempt */
>> -	unsigned long	lp_ping_deadline;     /* != 0 if ping reply expected */
>> -	unsigned long	lp_last_alive;	/* when I was last alive */
>> -	unsigned long	lp_last_query;	/* when lp_ni was queried last time */
>> -	lnet_ni_t	*lp_ni;		/* interface peer is on */
>> -	lnet_nid_t	lp_nid;	       /* peer's NID */
>> -	int	       lp_refcount;	  /* # refs */
>> -	int			lp_cpt;		/* CPT this peer attached on */
>> +	/* chain on peer hash */
>> +	struct list_head	lp_hashlist;
>> +	/* messages blocking for tx credits */
>> +	struct list_head	lp_txq;
>> +	/* messages blocking for router credits */
>> +	struct list_head	lp_rtrq;
>> +	/* chain on router list */
>> +	struct list_head	lp_rtr_list;
>> +	/* # tx credits available */
>> +	int			lp_txcredits;
>> +	/* low water mark */
>> +	int			lp_mintxcredits;
>> +	/* # router credits */
>> +	int			lp_rtrcredits;
>> +	/* low water mark */
>> +	int			lp_minrtrcredits;
>> +	/* alive/dead? */
>> +	unsigned int		lp_alive:1;
>> +	/* notification outstanding? */
>> +	unsigned int		lp_notify:1;
>> +	/* outstanding notification for LND? */
>> +	unsigned int		lp_notifylnd:1;
>
>This new block of declarations is uglier than the original.  Don't make
>things uglier.

Might be ugly but it makes checkpatch.pl happy.  So it is a choice between
making checkpatch.pl happy about staying in the 80 character limit or looking
nice and chekpatch.pl being unhappy.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 22:46 James Simmons
2015-05-22 13:00 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 15:12   ` Simmons, James A. [this message]
2015-05-22 15:24     ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b5d34de937b54607b8c8f715bfade82a@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov \
    --to=simmonsja@ornl.gov \
    --cc=HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=uja.ornl@gmail.com \
    --cc=uja.ornl@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®