Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: input: qcom,pm8xxx-vib: add more PMIC support

[Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>]

On 7/27/2023 4:29 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/07/2023 09:54, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>>>>> +          - enum:
>>>>> +              - qcom,pm7550ba-vib
>>>>> +          - const: qcom,pm7325b-vib
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes
>>>
>>> I wonder why this approved change turned out to something incorrect in
>>> your v3 patch...
>>>
>> Since I got review comments in the driver change and I was told to
>> refactor the driver before adding new HW support. I added the HW type
>> logic in the driver and I was thinking it might be good to add some
>> generic compatible strings to match with the HW type introduced in the
>> driver change.
>>
>> Anyway, I will update it to what you suggested in next patch.
> 
> Drivers are not really related to bindings, so whatever HW type you add
> in driver, is not a reason to change bindings. Reason to change bindings
> could be for example: because hardware is like that.
> 
Understood.

Sorry, I forgot to mention, in v3, I added the 'reg' value to the 
register offset and no longer hard code the 16-bit register address, 
that makes the vibrators inside PMI632/PM7250B/PM7325B/PM7550BA all 
compatible, and that was another motivation of adding a generic 
compatible string and make the others as the fallback.

This will be still the case in v4, I might keep it similar in v3 but 
just drop "qcom,spmi-vib-gen1"

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>