mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework #2 of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:50:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807140750r54e5139aj7b25a28ef7ca247e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214947935.5658.11.camel@earth>

2008/7/1 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>:
>
> Finally, this new version compiles and boots (applied a minor compilation fix).
> Functionality is not yet fully tested though.
>
> It's on top of today's tip tree.
>
> Any objections to this approach?

[ ping ]

Gregory or anyone else, any feedback on this one?

TIA,


>
> ---
> From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
> Subject: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones in a generic way
>
> (1) handle in a generic way all cases when a newly woken-up task is
> not migratable (not just a corner case when "rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed ==
> 1")
>
> (2) if current is to be preempted, then make sure "p" will be picked
> up by pick_next_task_rt().
> i.e. move task's group at the head of its list as well.
>
> currently, it's not a case for the group-scheduling case as described
> here: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.0/0134.html
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index 7c96147..7bc73e8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -599,11 +599,7 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>        if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running))
>                return;
>
> -       if (rt_se->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> -               list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> -       else
> -               list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> -
> +       list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
>        __set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
>
>        inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
> @@ -689,31 +685,33 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
>  * followed by enqueue.
>  */
>  static
> -void requeue_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> +void requeue_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int head)
>  {
> -       struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
> -
>        if (on_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
> -               list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
> -               list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list,
> -                             array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se));
> +               struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
> +               struct list_head *queue = array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se);
> +
> +               if (head)
> +                       list_move(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> +               else
> +                       list_move_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
>        }
>  }
>
> -static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int head)
>  {
>        struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
>        struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>
>        for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
>                rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
> -               requeue_rt_entity(rt_rq, rt_se);
> +               requeue_rt_entity(rt_rq, rt_se, head);
>        }
>  }
>
>  static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -       requeue_task_rt(rq, rq->curr);
> +       requeue_task_rt(rq, rq->curr, 0);
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -753,6 +751,30 @@ static int select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>         */
>        return task_cpu(p);
>  }
> +
> +static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +       cpumask_t mask;
> +
> +       if (rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1
> +           && cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, &mask))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (!cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, &mask))
> +               return;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * There appears to be other cpus that can accept
> +        * current and none to run 'p', so lets reschedule
> +        * to try and push current away:
> +        */
> +       requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 1);
> +       resched_task(rq->curr);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
>  /*
> @@ -778,18 +800,8 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>         * to move current somewhere else, making room for our non-migratable
>         * task.
>         */
> -       if((p->prio == rq->curr->prio)
> -          && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1
> -          && rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1) {
> -               cpumask_t mask;
> -
> -               if (cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, &mask))
> -                       /*
> -                        * There appears to be other cpus that can accept
> -                        * current, so lets reschedule to try and push it away
> -                        */
> -                       resched_task(rq->curr);
> -       }
> +       if (p->prio == rq->curr->prio && !need_resched())
> +               check_preempt_equal_prio(rq, p);
>  #endif
>  }
>
> @@ -1415,7 +1427,7 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
>         * on the queue:
>         */
>        if (p->rt.run_list.prev != p->rt.run_list.next) {
> -               requeue_task_rt(rq, p);
> +               requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
>                set_tsk_need_resched(p);
>        }
>  }
>
> ---
>
>
> --Dmitry
>
>
>

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-14 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-01 21:32 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-14 14:50 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-15  3:01   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 13:05   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-15 13:14     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-18 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-01 13:32 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-01 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-01 14:19   ` Dmitry Adamushko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b647ffbd0807140750r54e5139aj7b25a28ef7ca247e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome