From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework #2 of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones"
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807150614j38204f41q3e7b4ed0ffff101b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487C6873.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
2008/7/15 Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:50 AM, in message
> <b647ffbd0807140750r54e5139aj7b25a28ef7ca247e@mail.gmail.com>, "Dmitry
> Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/7/1 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Finally, this new version compiles and boots (applied a minor compilation
>> fix).
>>> Functionality is not yet fully tested though.
>>>
>>> It's on top of today's tip tree.
>>>
>>> Any objections to this approach?
>>
>> [ ping ]
>>
>> Gregory or anyone else, any feedback on this one?
>
> Hi Dmitry,
> A brief inspection of the patch looks good. I am still not convinced we need to worry
> about this condition anymore, however.
Neither am I.
It's just that (I think):
(a) either we remove this whole new 'concept' (as it's implemented
now) completely;
(b) or do it in a more generic way (like with this patch).
Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Regards,
> -Greg
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 21:32 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-14 14:50 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15 3:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15 13:05 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-07-15 13:14 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-18 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-01 13:32 Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-01 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-01 14:19 ` Dmitry Adamushko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b647ffbd0807150614j38204f41q3e7b4ed0ffff101b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome