mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
	"Tigran Aivazian" <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: "Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:25:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0808010425r16db2957i3e7212903a698c19@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48903431.9060707@amd.com>

Tigran, Peter,


may a firmware package contain a few 'microcode' updates for a specific cpu?

And if so, does each of them provide independent 'errata' fixes? [*]

(or they are just different versions of the same self-consistent/full
'microcode' update and we may need to apply each of them just e.g.
because we can't jump from stepping X.1 to X.3 without applying X.2 in
between?

if it's [1], then I wonder why only a single 'microcode' update (which
has been previously cached in 'uci->mc') is being applied for the case
of system-wide resume (apply_microcode_check_cpu()). Don't we need to
go through the full cpu_request_microcode() cycle to consider all
updates?


TIA,

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-01 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-29 15:41 Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 1/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loader style corrections Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 2/4] x86: Intel " Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 3/4] x86: Moved function declarations out from AMD microcode patch loader to heade file Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 15:41 ` [patch 4/4] x86: Minor pointer type cast in AMD microcode patch loader Peter Oruba
2008-07-29 16:18 ` [patch 0/4] x86: AMD microcode patch loading v2 fixes Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-29 17:49   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-29 19:37     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30  9:28     ` Peter Oruba
2008-07-30  9:57       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30 10:34         ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-30 16:35           ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 18:38             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-31 21:24               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-01  2:23                 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 16:54         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-30 20:59           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-01  2:18             ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-01 11:25       ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-08-01 12:21         ` Peter Oruba
2008-08-01 15:26         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-31 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-31 22:02   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-31 22:12     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b647ffbd0808010425r16db2957i3e7212903a698c19@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome