From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, brgerst@gmail.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/ia32: Normalize any null selector value to 0
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:09:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6f8fb05-057f-4531-b03b-839374ac9dc0@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3680972b-1871-4c92-9f61-c28ef7c10a4c@citrix.com>
On 11/20/2024 1:33 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> The first GDT descriptor is reserved as 'null descriptor'. As bits 0
>> and 1 of a segment selector, i.e., the DPL bits, are NOT used to index
>
> That's RPL in segment selector, not DPL. Same correction is needed in
> the code comments.
Intel SDM says:
• Descriptor privilege level (DPL) field —
(Bits 13 and 14 in the second doubleword of a segment descriptor.)
Determines the privilege level of the segment.
• Requested privilege level (RPL) field —
(Bits 0 and 1 of any segment selector.) Specifies the requested
privilege level of a segment selector.
I got lost somehow.
>
>> GDT, selector values 0~3 all point to the null descriptor, thus values
>> 0, 1, 2 and 3 are all valid null selector values.
>>
>> Furthermore IRET zeros ES, FS, GS, and DS segment registers if any of
>> them is found to have any null selector value, essentially making 0 a
>> preferred null selector value.
>
> Zeroing of RPL in null selectors is an information leak in pre-FRED
> systems. Userspace can spot any interrupt/exception by loading a
> nonzero NULL selector, and waiting for it to drop to zero.
>
> Userspace should not be able to do this; Andy and I lobbied for this
> during the design of FRED, and Intel agreed.
I wasn't aware of this, and hpa just told me you're right :)
>
> Right now, this change is codifying the problem behaviour we were trying
> to fix out under FRED.
>
> Under FRED, if userspace loads e.g. 2 into a selector, it should remain
> 2 until userspace changes it to something else.
Okay, I will fix it by:
1) For null selector values, do nothing.
2) For non-null selector values, set RPL bits.
sounds okay?
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 8:17 Xin Li (Intel)
2024-11-20 9:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-11-20 19:09 ` Xin Li [this message]
2024-11-20 19:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-11-21 3:54 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6f8fb05-057f-4531-b03b-839374ac9dc0@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®