From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@google.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "liam.merwick@oracle.com" <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
"Kohler, Jon" <jon@nutanix.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Amit.Shah@amd.com" <Amit.Shah@amd.com>,
"michael.roth@amd.com" <michael.roth@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2025.06.18 - Any topics?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 23:51:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9722d7f691f3aa32c4c725139a99ad49902aacb.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617210100.514888-1-seanjc@google.com>
There are an increasing number of TDX intersecting patchsets flying around or
being alluded to. I was thinking it could help to have a discussion on how they
are all going to come together.
- What parts do we want to do iteratively vs co-designed?
- How to avoid duplicate work like debugging bugs in dependencies that are
already fixed in private?
- What order to do them upstream?
- How to evaluate/test Linux guests for features that don't have qemu support?
- Others?
Of course some of these series' are not TDX specific. But in the TDX neck of the
woods, there seems to be a bit of a gap in common understanding.
Is a TDX focused discussion useful? Could we do it as a PUCK call agenda item?
Thanks,
Rick
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 21:01 Sean Christopherson
2025-06-20 23:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9722d7f691f3aa32c4c725139a99ad49902aacb.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=Amit.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®