* [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2025.06.18 - Any topics?
@ 2025-06-17 21:01 Sean Christopherson
2025-06-20 23:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-17 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson
Cc: kvm, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini, Michael Roth, Jon Kohler,
Amit Shah, Rick Edgecombe, Liam Merwick, Tom Lendacky, Yan Zhao
I won't be able to make PUCK tomorrow, but that doesn't mean y'all can't meet
without me. I _think_ if someone hits "Record", it will show up in my Google
Drive (because I'm the meeting owner), and then I can get it uploaded to the
shared drive. So, someone just needs to take charge tomorrow :-)
Alternatively, if no one has anything to discuss, we can just cancel outright.
But IIRC, Paolo is out the next two weeks, so this may be your last chance to
pester him for a while.
Sorry for the late notice, this week has been a bit hectic.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2025.06.18 - Any topics?
2025-06-17 21:01 [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2025.06.18 - Any topics? Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-20 23:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edgecombe, Rick P @ 2025-06-20 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Annapurve, Vishal, seanjc
Cc: liam.merwick, Kohler, Jon, linux-kernel, thomas.lendacky, Zhao,
Yan Y, kvm, pbonzini, Amit.Shah, michael.roth
There are an increasing number of TDX intersecting patchsets flying around or
being alluded to. I was thinking it could help to have a discussion on how they
are all going to come together.
- What parts do we want to do iteratively vs co-designed?
- How to avoid duplicate work like debugging bugs in dependencies that are
already fixed in private?
- What order to do them upstream?
- How to evaluate/test Linux guests for features that don't have qemu support?
- Others?
Of course some of these series' are not TDX specific. But in the TDX neck of the
woods, there seems to be a bit of a gap in common understanding.
Is a TDX focused discussion useful? Could we do it as a PUCK call agenda item?
Thanks,
Rick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-20 23:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-17 21:01 [ANNOUNCE] PUCK Agenda - 2025.06.18 - Any topics? Sean Christopherson
2025-06-20 23:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®