mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera().
@ 2009-10-03  6:24 Rakib Mullick
  2009-10-03  7:20 ` Corentin Chary
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rakib Mullick @ 2009-10-03  6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: corentincj; +Cc: acpi4asus-user, Andrew Morton, LKML

 Currently the annotation for function eeepc_enable_camera() is
__init, and refers to a
function eeepc_hotk_add() which is non-init. Use __devinit for both
functions which is
more appropriate and fixes a section mismatch warning.

 We were warned by the following warning:

  LD      drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x12e1): Section
mismatch in reference from the function eeepc_hotk_add() to the
function .init.text:eeepc_enable_camera()
The function eeepc_hotk_add() references
the function __init eeepc_enable_camera().
This is often because eeepc_hotk_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of eeepc_enable_camera is wrong.

---
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>

--- linus/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
12:44:40.000000000 +0600
+++ rakib/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
12:48:42.000000000 +0600
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops eeepc_rfk
 	.set_block = eeepc_rfkill_set,
 };

-static void __init eeepc_enable_camera(void)
+static void __devinit eeepc_enable_camera(void)
 {
 	/*
 	 * If the following call to set_acpi() fails, it's because there's no
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int eeepc_input_init(struct devic
 	return 0;
 }

-static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int __devinit eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
 	int result;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera().
  2009-10-03  6:24 [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera() Rakib Mullick
@ 2009-10-03  7:20 ` Corentin Chary
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corentin Chary @ 2009-10-03  7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rakib Mullick; +Cc: acpi4asus-user, Andrew Morton, LKML

On Saturday 03 October 2009 08:24:53 Rakib Mullick wrote:
>  Currently the annotation for function eeepc_enable_camera() is
> __init, and refers to a
> function eeepc_hotk_add() which is non-init. Use __devinit for both
> functions which is
> more appropriate and fixes a section mismatch warning.
> 
>  We were warned by the following warning:
> 
>   LD      drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o
> WARNING: drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x12e1): Section
> mismatch in reference from the function eeepc_hotk_add() to the
> function .init.text:eeepc_enable_camera()
> The function eeepc_hotk_add() references
> the function __init eeepc_enable_camera().
> This is often because eeepc_hotk_add lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of eeepc_enable_camera is wrong.
> 
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
> 
> --- linus/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
> 12:44:40.000000000 +0600
> +++ rakib/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
> 12:48:42.000000000 +0600
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops eeepc_rfk
>  	.set_block = eeepc_rfkill_set,
>  };
> 
> -static void __init eeepc_enable_camera(void)
> +static void __devinit eeepc_enable_camera(void)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * If the following call to set_acpi() fails, it's because there's no
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int eeepc_input_init(struct devic
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int __devinit eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	int result;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Hi,
The patch is broken again, 
The section 
> --- linus/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
> 12:44:40.000000000 +0600
> +++ rakib/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c	2009-10-03
> 12:48:42.000000000 +0600
is line-wrapped by mail client when you send it. It happens because 
rakib/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c is a very long patch.

The Signed-off-by also should be before ---

Anyway I fixed it and applied your patch in acpi4asus tree.
I'll try to get it merged into 2.6.32.

Please read Documentation/email-clients.txt to fix your mail client
or just use git send-email.

Thanks,
-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-03  7:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-03  6:24 [Resend][PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera() Rakib Mullick
2009-10-03  7:20 ` Corentin Chary

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®