From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
mhiramat@kernel.org, qyousef@layalina.io, wvw@google.com,
xuewen.yan94@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/23] PM: EM: Add performance field to struct em_perf_state and optimize
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:13:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba1e8112-c82e-458d-b7f7-9a308295d260@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117095714.1524808-14-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
On 17/01/2024 09:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
[...]
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> index 5ebe9dbec8e1..689d71f6b56f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> /**
> * struct em_perf_state - Performance state of a performance domain
> + * @performance: CPU performance (capacity) at a given frequency
I guess this is what we called the 'current CPU capacity' in older
Android versions.
[...]
> @@ -260,26 +262,24 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> /*
> * In order to predict the performance state, map the utilization of
> * the most utilized CPU of the performance domain to a requested
> - * frequency, like schedutil. Take also into account that the real
> - * frequency might be set lower (due to thermal capping). Thus, clamp
> + * performance, like schedutil. Take also into account that the real
> + * performance might be set lower (due to thermal capping). Thus, clamp
> * max utilization to the allowed CPU capacity before calculating
> - * effective frequency.
> + * effective performance.
> */
> cpu = cpumask_first(to_cpumask(pd->cpus));
> scale_cpu = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> - ref_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
>
> max_util = map_util_perf(max_util);
Didn't apply cleanly on tip sched/code for me.
Looks like it's missing:
9c0b4bb7f630 - sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance
estimation (2023-11-23 Vincent Guittot)
> max_util = min(max_util, allowed_cpu_cap);
> - freq = map_util_freq(max_util, ref_freq, scale_cpu);
Since you're removing this here, shouldn't you also remove
* In order to predict the performance state, map the utilization of
* the most utilized CPU of the performance domain to a requested
Looks like with 9c0b4bb7f630 there is no mapping anymore?
[...]
> static int em_compute_costs(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table,
> struct em_data_callback *cb, int nr_states,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -318,6 +343,8 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> table[i].frequency = prev_freq = freq;
> }
>
> + em_init_performance(dev, pd, table, nr_states);
Looks like pd already has 'pd->nr_perf_states' initialized. so just
passing pd seems to be sufficient. Like for em_table_alloc() and
em_create_perf_table().
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 9:56 [PATCH v7 00/23] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] PM: EM: Add missing newline for the message log Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 11:02 ` Hongyan Xia
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] PM: EM: Extend em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() argument list Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 11:10 ` Hongyan Xia
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] PM: EM: Find first CPU active while updating OPP efficiency Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 12:05 ` Hongyan Xia
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 12:45 ` Hongyan Xia
2024-02-06 13:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 05/23] PM: EM: Introduce em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] PM: EM: Check if the get_cost() callback is present in em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] PM: EM: Split the allocation and initialization of the EM table Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:56 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] PM: EM: Use runtime modified EM for CPUs energy estimation in EAS Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 10/23] PM: EM: Add functions for memory allocations for new EM tables Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] PM: EM: Introduce em_dev_update_perf_domain() for EM updates Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] PM: EM: Add em_perf_state_from_pd() to get performance states table Lukasz Luba
2024-01-29 18:13 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-02-06 13:55 ` Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] PM: EM: Add performance field to struct em_perf_state and optimize Lukasz Luba
2024-01-29 18:13 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] PM: EM: Support late CPUs booting and capacity adjustment Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] PM: EM: Optimize em_cpu_energy() and remove division Lukasz Luba
2024-02-07 11:40 ` Hongyan Xia
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] powercap/dtpm_cpu: Use new Energy Model interface to get table Lukasz Luba
2024-01-29 18:14 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] powercap/dtpm_devfreq: " Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling: Use new Energy Model interface Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling: " Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] PM: EM: Change debugfs configuration to use runtime EM table data Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] PM: EM: Remove old table Lukasz Luba
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] PM: EM: Add em_dev_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2024-01-29 18:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-01-17 9:57 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] Documentation: EM: Update with runtime modification design Lukasz Luba
2024-01-29 18:16 ` [PATCH v7 00/23] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Dietmar Eggemann
2024-02-06 13:54 ` Lukasz Luba
2024-02-07 9:15 ` Lukasz Luba
2024-02-07 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-07 11:49 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba1e8112-c82e-458d-b7f7-9a308295d260@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®