[PATCH REPOST v4 1/7] i40e/i40evf: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[PATCH REPOST v4 1/7] i40e/i40evf: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier
on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c   | 8 ++++----
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
index e554aa6cf..9455869 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int i40e_program_fdir_filter(struct i40e_fdir_filter *fdir_data,
 	/* Mark the data descriptor to be watched */
 	first->next_to_watch = tx_desc;
 
-	writel(tx_ring->next_to_use, tx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(tx_ring->next_to_use, tx_ring->tail);
 	return 0;
 
 dma_fail:
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val)
 	 * such as IA-64).
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(val, rx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2258,7 +2258,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 		 */
 		wmb();
 
-		writel(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(xdp_ring->next_to_use, xdp_ring->tail);
 	}
 
 	rx_ring->skb = skb;
@@ -3286,7 +3286,7 @@ static inline int i40e_tx_map(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
index 357d605..56eea20 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static inline void i40e_release_rx_desc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u32 val)
 	 * such as IA-64).
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(val, rx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(val, rx_ring->tail);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2243,7 +2243,7 @@ static inline void i40evf_tx_map(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH REPOST v4 2/7] ixgbe: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 0da5aa2..58ed70f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ void ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
 		 * know there are new descriptors to fetch.
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 		xdp_do_flush_map();
 	}
@@ -8078,7 +8078,7 @@ static int ixgbe_tx_map(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
 	ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
 
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -10014,7 +10014,7 @@ static void ixgbe_xdp_flush(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * are new descriptors to fetch.
 	 */
 	wmb();
-	writel(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(ring->next_to_use, ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH REPOST v4 3/7] igbvf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier
on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
index 4214c15..edb1c34 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void igbvf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igbvf_ring *rx_ring,
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		*/
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static inline void igbvf_tx_queue_adv(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter,
 
 	tx_ring->buffer_info[first].next_to_watch = tx_desc;
 	tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
-	writel(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + tx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + tx_ring->tail);
 	/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 	 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
 	 */
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH REPOST v4 4/7] igb: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier
on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index b88fae7..82aea92 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -5671,7 +5671,7 @@ static int igb_tx_map(struct igb_ring *tx_ring,
 	igb_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
 
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -8072,7 +8072,7 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[Sinan Kaya]

Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
wmb().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
index f695242..11e893e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h
@@ -244,11 +244,6 @@ static inline u16 ixgbevf_desc_unused(struct ixgbevf_ring *ring)
 	return ((ntc > ntu) ? 0 : ring->count) + ntc - ntu - 1;
 }
 
-static inline void ixgbevf_write_tail(struct ixgbevf_ring *ring, u32 value)
-{
-	writel(value, ring->tail);
-}
-
 #define IXGBEVF_RX_DESC(R, i)	\
 	(&(((union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i]))
 #define IXGBEVF_TX_DESC(R, i)	\
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 9b3d43d..6bf778a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		ixgbevf_write_tail(rx_ring, i);
+		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3644,7 +3644,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
 	tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
-	ixgbevf_write_tail(tx_ring, i);
+	writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 dma_error:
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[Jeff Kirsher]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
> wmb().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[okaya]

On 2018-03-21 17:48, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>> wmb().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.

Hah, I did a compile test but maybe I missed something. I will get v6 of 
this patch only and leave the rest of the series as it is.

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[Alexander Duyck]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:51 PM,  <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 2018-03-21 17:48, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>
>>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>>> wmb().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
>> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
>
>
> Hah, I did a compile test but maybe I missed something. I will get v6 of
> this patch only and leave the rest of the series as it is.

Actually you might want to just pull Jeff's tree and rebase before you
submit your patches. I suspect the difference is the ixgbevf XDP code
that is present in Jeff's tree and not in Dave's. The alternative is
to wait for Jeff to push the ixgbevf code and then once Dave has
pulled it you could rebase your patches.

Thanks.

- Alex

Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[David Miller]

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700

> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>> wmb().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.

For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
confidence if the code does not even compile.

Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.

Thank you.

Re: [PATCH REPOST v4 5/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()

[okaya]

On 2018-03-21 17:54, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:48:08 -0700
> 
>> On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 14:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> Remove ixgbevf_write_tail() in favor of moving writel() close to
>>> wmb().
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      | 5 -----
>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> This patch fails to compile because there is a call to
>> ixgbevf_write_tail() which you missed cleaning up.
> 
> For a change with delicate side effects, it doesn't create much
> confidence if the code does not even compile.
> 
> Sinan, please put more care into the changes you are making.

I think the issue is the tree that code is getting tested has 
undelivered code as Alex mentioned.

I was using linux-next 4.16 rc4 for testing.

I will rebase to Jeff's tree.

> 
> Thank you.

[PATCH REPOST v4 6/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 6bf778a..774b2a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct ixgbevf_ring *rx_ring,
 		 * such as IA-64).
 		 */
 		wmb();
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3644,7 +3644,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
 	tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
-	writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+	writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 	return;
 dma_error:
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH REPOST v4 7/7] fm10k: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs

[Sinan Kaya]

Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a
barrier on some architectures like arm64.

This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing
the register write.

Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
index 8e12aae..eebef01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void fm10k_alloc_rx_buffers(struct fm10k_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 		wmb();
 
 		/* notify hardware of new descriptors */
-		writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, rx_ring->tail);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static void fm10k_tx_map(struct fm10k_ring *tx_ring,
 
 	/* notify HW of packet */
 	if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
-		writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+		writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
 
 		/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
 		 * at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
-- 
2.7.4