Re: [PATCH] media: synopsys: hdmirx: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq

[Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>]

On 2/10/26 17:36, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 10:18 PM Dmitry Osipenko
> <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>> Alright, looking further at the code, apparently there is nothing
>> special RE the two unbound work queues. See some parts of kernel already
>> moved to system_dfl. Would be great is this all was clarified in the
>> commit message.
>>
>> Acked-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If you want I can send a new version with the improved commit log:
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>    commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>    commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
> 
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>    system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>    system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> 
> ---
> 
> Let me know what's best.

That's better, feel free to send the v2. Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry