From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
jon.grimm@amd.com, wei.huang2@amd.com, terry.bowman@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 04/12] KVM: SVM: Update max number of vCPUs supported for x2AVIC mode
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:13:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd33f54dce24c145470cc1dbcdc3074f0f53cc67.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308163926.563994-5-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 10:39 -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> xAVIC and x2AVIC modes can support diffferent number of vcpus.
> Update existing logics to support each mode accordingly.
>
> Also, modify the maximum physical APIC ID for AVIC to 255 to reflect
> the actual value supported by the architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 12 +++++++++---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> index 7a7a2297165b..681a348a9365 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
> @@ -250,10 +250,16 @@ enum avic_ipi_failure_cause {
>
>
> /*
> - * 0xff is broadcast, so the max index allowed for physical APIC ID
> - * table is 0xfe. APIC IDs above 0xff are reserved.
> + * For AVIC, the max index allowed for physical APIC ID
> + * table is 0xff (255).
> */
> -#define AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT 0xff
This should be 0xFE, since index 0xFF is reserved in AVIC mode.
It used to work because (see below) check used to be '>=',
but I do like that you switched to '>' check instead.
> +#define AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID 0XFFULL
> +
> +/*
> + * For x2AVIC, the max index allowed for physical APIC ID
> + * table is 0x1ff (511).
> + */
> +#define X2AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID 0x1FFUL
>
> #define AVIC_HPA_MASK ~((0xFFFULL << 52) | 0xFFF)
> #define VMCB_AVIC_APIC_BAR_MASK 0xFFFFFFFFFF000ULL
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> index 49b185f0d42e..f128b0189d4a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ void avic_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> vmcb->control.avic_backing_page = bpa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;
> vmcb->control.avic_logical_id = lpa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;
> vmcb->control.avic_physical_id = ppa & AVIC_HPA_MASK;
> - vmcb->control.avic_physical_id |= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT;
> + vmcb->control.avic_physical_id |= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID;
> vmcb->control.avic_vapic_bar = APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE & VMCB_AVIC_APIC_BAR_MASK;
>
> if (kvm_apicv_activated(svm->vcpu.kvm))
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static u64 *avic_get_physical_id_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u64 *avic_physical_id_table;
> struct kvm_svm *kvm_svm = to_kvm_svm(vcpu->kvm);
>
> - if (index >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT)
This is the check I am talking about
> + if ((avic_mode == AVIC_MODE_X1 && index > AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID) ||
> + (avic_mode == AVIC_MODE_X2 && index > X2AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID))
> return NULL;
I would probably like to ask to move this check to a function,
but I see that avic_get_physical_id_entry is only used in avic_handle_apic_id_update
in addition to avic_init_backing_page which has this check,
and I will sooner or later remove the anywat broken avic_handle_apic_id_update and
inline the avic_get_physical_id_entry probably so no need to do this.
>
> avic_physical_id_table = page_address(kvm_svm->avic_physical_id_table_page);
> @@ -245,7 +246,8 @@ static int avic_init_backing_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>
> - if (id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT)
> + if ((avic_mode == AVIC_MODE_X1 && id > AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID) ||
> + (avic_mode == AVIC_MODE_X2 && id > X2AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!vcpu->arch.apic->regs)
So except the off-by-one error in AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT:
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 16:39 [RFCv2 PATCH 00/12] Introducing AMD x2APIC Virtualization (x2AVIC) support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 01/12] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce x2AVIC CPUID bit Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 02/12] KVM: x86: lapic: Rename [GET/SET]_APIC_DEST_FIELD to [GET/SET]_XAPIC_DEST_FIELD Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 10:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 03/12] KVM: SVM: Detect X2APIC virtualization (x2AVIC) support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 10:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 04/12] KVM: SVM: Update max number of vCPUs supported for x2AVIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 11:13 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 05/12] KVM: SVM: Update avic_kick_target_vcpus to support 32-bit APIC ID Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 11:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 06/12] KVM: SVM: Do not update logical APIC ID table when in x2APIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 11:37 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 07/12] KVM: SVM: Introduce helper function kvm_get_apic_id Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 14:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-05 3:58 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-04-05 9:36 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 08/12] KVM: SVM: Adding support for configuring x2APIC MSRs interception Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 15:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-05 1:45 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 09/12] KVM: SVM: Refresh AVIC settings when changing APIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 15:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-31 4:04 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 10/12] KVM: SVM: Introduce helper functions to (de)activate AVIC and x2AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 15:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 11/12] KVM: SVM: Do not throw warning when calling avic_vcpu_load on a running vcpu Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-03-24 15:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 16:39 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 12/12] KVM: SVM: Do not inhibit APICv when x2APIC is present Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd33f54dce24c145470cc1dbcdc3074f0f53cc67.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®