* [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation
2023-12-20 13:38 [PATCH v6 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-20 13:38 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, robin.murphy, joro, dmitry.baryshkov, konrad.dybcio,
jsnitsel, quic_bjorande, mani, quic_eberman, robdclark,
u.kleine-koenig, robh, vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti,
quic_molvera
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel,
qipl.kernel.upstream, Bibek Kumar Patro
Default MMU-500 reset operation disables context caching in
prefetch buffer. It is however expected for context banks using
the ACTLR register to retain their prefetch value during reset
and runtime suspend.
Replace default MMU-500 reset operation with Qualcomm specific reset
operation which envelope the default reset operation and re-enables
context caching in prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 549ae4dba3a6..000e207346af 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -14,6 +14,16 @@
#define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
+/*
+ * SMMU-500 TRM defines BIT(0) as CMTLB (Enable context caching in the
+ * macro TLB) and BIT(1) as CPRE (Enable context caching in the prefetch
+ * buffer). The remaining bits are implementation defined and vary across
+ * SoCs.
+ */
+
+#define CPRE (1 << 1)
+#define CMTLB (1 << 0)
+
static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
@@ -376,11 +386,32 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
}
+static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 val;
+ int i;
+
+ ret = arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* arm_mmu500_reset() disables CPRE which is re-enabled here */
+ for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
+ val = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
+ val |= CPRE;
+ arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, val);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
int ret;
- arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+ qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
/*
* To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
@@ -407,7 +438,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
.init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
.cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
- .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+ .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
.write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
};
@@ -432,7 +463,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
.init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
- .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+ .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
.alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
.write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer
2023-12-20 13:38 [PATCH v6 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-20 13:38 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-21 0:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, robin.murphy, joro, dmitry.baryshkov, konrad.dybcio,
jsnitsel, quic_bjorande, mani, quic_eberman, robdclark,
u.kleine-koenig, robh, vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti,
quic_molvera
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel,
qipl.kernel.upstream, Bibek Kumar Patro
qcom_smmu_match_data is static and constant so refactor qcom_smmu
to store single pointer to qcom_smmu_match_data instead of
replicating multiple child members of the same and handle the further
dereferences in the places that want them.
Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
index bb89d49adf8d..e9798b133cbb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ void qcom_smmu_tlb_sync_debug(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
if (__ratelimit(&rs)) {
dev_err(smmu->dev, "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
- cfg = qsmmu->cfg;
+ cfg = qsmmu->data->cfg;
if (!cfg)
return;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 000e207346af..20c9836d859b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
qsmmu->smmu.impl = impl;
- qsmmu->cfg = data->cfg;
+ qsmmu->data = data;
return &qsmmu->smmu;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index 593910567b88..f3b91963e234 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
struct qcom_smmu {
struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
- const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
+ const struct qcom_smmu_match_data *data;
bool bypass_quirk;
u8 bypass_cbndx;
u32 stall_enabled;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-21 0:28 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2023-12-21 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:38, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> qcom_smmu_match_data is static and constant so refactor qcom_smmu
> to store single pointer to qcom_smmu_match_data instead of
> replicating multiple child members of the same and handle the further
> dereferences in the places that want them.
>
> Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-20 13:38 [PATCH v6 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-20 13:38 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-21 0:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550 Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280 Bibek Kumar Patro
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, robin.murphy, joro, dmitry.baryshkov, konrad.dybcio,
jsnitsel, quic_bjorande, mani, quic_eberman, robdclark,
u.kleine-koenig, robh, vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti,
quic_molvera
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel,
qipl.kernel.upstream, Bibek Kumar Patro
Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
context bank initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
#define CPRE (1 << 1)
#define CMTLB (1 << 0)
+struct actlr_config {
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 mask;
+ u32 actlr;
+};
+
static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
@@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
return true;
}
+static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
+ const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
+ u16 mask;
+ int idx;
+ u16 id;
+ int i;
+
+ for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
+ id = actlrcfg->sid;
+ mask = actlrcfg->mask;
+
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
+ smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
+ if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
+ arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
+ actlrcfg->actlr);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
@@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
+ if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
+
+ if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
+
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
/*
- * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/
#ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
@@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
const u32 *reg_offset;
};
+struct actlr_config;
+
struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
+ const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
+ const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
* expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
* no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
*/
- if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
- !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
+
+ if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
return i;
+
/*
* If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
* though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
@@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
}
+static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
+{
+ return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
+}
+
#define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
#define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
#define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-21 0:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-21 0:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-21 10:02 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2023-12-21 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
> the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
> register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
> to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
> of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
>
> ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
> in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
> context bank initialisation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
> #define CPRE (1 << 1)
> #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
>
> +struct actlr_config {
> + u16 sid;
> + u16 mask;
> + u32 actlr;
> +};
> +
> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
> @@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> + struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
> + u16 mask;
> + int idx;
> + u16 id;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
> + id = actlrcfg->sid;
> + mask = actlrcfg->mask;
> +
> + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
> + smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
> + if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
> + actlrcfg->actlr);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
>
> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> @@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>
> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
There was a feedback point against v4 that there can be more than two
(apps + gpu) SMMU devices. No, we can not use additional compat
strings, the SMMU units are compatible with each other. Please add
matching between the smmu and particular actlr table using the IO
address of the SMMU block.
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> {
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> +
> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
> +
One issue occured to me, while I was reviewing the patchset. The ACTLR
settings are related to the whole SMMU setup, but we are applying them
each time there is an SMMU context init (in other words, one per each
domain). Is that correct? Or it's just that there is no better place
for initialising the global register set? Would it be better to
reprogram the ACTLR registers which are related just to this
particular domain?
> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> /*
> - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
> const u32 *reg_offset;
> };
>
> +struct actlr_config;
> +
> struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
> const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
> const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
> const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
> * expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
> * no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
> */
> - if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
> - !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
> +
> + if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
> return i;
> +
> /*
> * If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
> * though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
> }
>
> +static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
> +{
> + return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
> +}
> +
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-21 0:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2023-12-21 0:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-21 10:02 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2023-12-21 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 02:36, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
> > the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
> > register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
> > to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
> > of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
> >
> > ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
> > in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
> > context bank initialisation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
> > 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
> > #define CPRE (1 << 1)
> > #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
> >
> > +struct actlr_config {
> > + u16 sid;
> > + u16 mask;
> > + u32 actlr;
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> > {
> > return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
> > @@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
> > + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> > + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> > + struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
> > + u16 mask;
> > + int idx;
> > + u16 id;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
> > + id = actlrcfg->sid;
> > + mask = actlrcfg->mask;
> > +
> > + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
> > + smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
> > + if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
> > + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
> > + actlrcfg->actlr);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> > struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> > + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> > + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> > struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
> >
> > smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> > @@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> > priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> > priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
> >
> > + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
> > + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
>
> There was a feedback point against v4 that there can be more than two
> (apps + gpu) SMMU devices. No, we can not use additional compat
> strings, the SMMU units are compatible with each other. Please add
> matching between the smmu and particular actlr table using the IO
> address of the SMMU block.
>
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> > static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> > struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> > + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> > + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> > +
> > + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
> > + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
> > +
>
> One issue occured to me, while I was reviewing the patchset. The ACTLR
> settings are related to the whole SMMU setup, but we are applying them
> each time there is an SMMU context init (in other words, one per each
> domain). Is that correct? Or it's just that there is no better place
> for initialising the global register set? Would it be better to
> reprogram the ACTLR registers which are related just to this
> particular domain?
Ignore this, I went back to qcom_smmu_set_actlr() and understood that
I failed to read it properly.
>
> > smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> > index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > /*
> > - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > */
> >
> > #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
> > @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
> > const u32 *reg_offset;
> > };
> >
> > +struct actlr_config;
> > +
> > struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
> > + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
> > + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
> > const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
> > const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
> > const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
> > * expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
> > * no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
> > */
> > - if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
> > - !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
> > +
> > + if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
> > return i;
> > +
> > /*
> > * If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
> > * though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> > index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> > @@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> > writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
> > +{
> > + return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > #define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
> > #define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
> > #define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-21 0:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-12-21 0:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2023-12-21 10:02 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-21 10:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-21 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On 12/21/2023 6:06 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
>> the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
>> register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
>> to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
>> of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
>>
>> ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
>> in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
>> context bank initialisation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
>> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
>> #define CPRE (1 << 1)
>> #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
>>
>> +struct actlr_config {
>> + u16 sid;
>> + u16 mask;
>> + u32 actlr;
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> {
>> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
>> @@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
>> +{
>> + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>> + struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
>> + u16 mask;
>> + int idx;
>> + u16 id;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
>> + id = actlrcfg->sid;
>> + mask = actlrcfg->mask;
>> +
>> + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
>> + smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
>> + if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
>> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
>> + actlrcfg->actlr);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>> {
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
>>
>> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>> @@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>>
>> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
>> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
>
> There was a feedback point against v4 that there can be more than two
> (apps + gpu) SMMU devices. No, we can not use additional compat
> strings, the SMMU units are compatible with each other.
Just to understand better, did you mean if in the below check
[inside arm-smmu-qcom.c file during qcom_smmu_create()], "else" has two
things? (Currently adreno_impl for gpu smmu, else for only
apps smmu)
if (np && of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
impl = data->adreno_impl;
else
impl = data->impl;
> Please add
> matching between the smmu and particular actlr table using the IO
> address of the SMMU block.
>
The ACTLR table for each smmu will have A IO address attached, so based
on IO address we can apply ACTLR.
Is this your proposal((IMO hardcoding IO in driver won't be viable,
isn't it?), or in smmu DT we would need to set the IO?
Thanks & regards,
Bibek
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
>> static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>> {
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>> +
>> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
>> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
>> +
>
> One issue occured to me, while I was reviewing the patchset. The ACTLR
> settings are related to the whole SMMU setup, but we are applying them
> each time there is an SMMU context init (in other words, one per each
> domain). Is that correct? Or it's just that there is no better place
> for initialising the global register set? Would it be better to
> reprogram the ACTLR registers which are related just to this
> particular domain?
>
>> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>> index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> */
>>
>> #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
>> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
>> const u32 *reg_offset;
>> };
>>
>> +struct actlr_config;
>> +
>> struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
>> const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
>> const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
>> const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>> index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>> @@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
>> * expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
>> * no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
>> */
>> - if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
>> - !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
>> +
>> + if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
>> return i;
>> +
>> /*
>> * If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
>> * though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> @@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>> writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
>> +{
>> + return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
>> #define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-21 10:02 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-21 10:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-01-03 6:24 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2023-12-21 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 12:02, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/21/2023 6:06 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Bibek Kumar Patro
> > <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
> >> the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
> >> register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
> >> to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
> >> of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
> >>
> >> ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
> >> in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
> >> context bank initialisation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
> >> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
> >> #define CPRE (1 << 1)
> >> #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
> >>
> >> +struct actlr_config {
> >> + u16 sid;
> >> + u16 mask;
> >> + u32 actlr;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >> {
> >> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
> >> @@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
> >> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
> >> +{
> >> + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> >> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> >> + struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
> >> + u16 mask;
> >> + int idx;
> >> + u16 id;
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
> >> + id = actlrcfg->sid;
> >> + mask = actlrcfg->mask;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
> >> + smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
> >> + if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
> >> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
> >> + actlrcfg->actlr);
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> >> {
> >> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> >> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> >> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> >> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
> >>
> >> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> >> @@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> >> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
> >>
> >> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
> >> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
> >
> > There was a feedback point against v4 that there can be more than two
> > (apps + gpu) SMMU devices. No, we can not use additional compat
> > strings, the SMMU units are compatible with each other.
>
> Just to understand better, did you mean if in the below check
> [inside arm-smmu-qcom.c file during qcom_smmu_create()], "else" has two
> things? (Currently adreno_impl for gpu smmu, else for only
> apps smmu)
qcom,adreno-smmu is quite unique here, this is the only distinctive
substring. We do not have such compat strings for any other of SMMU
nodes.
>
> if (np && of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
> impl = data->adreno_impl;
> else
> impl = data->impl;
>
> > Please add
> > matching between the smmu and particular actlr table using the IO
> > address of the SMMU block.
> >
>
> The ACTLR table for each smmu will have A IO address attached, so based
> on IO address we can apply ACTLR.
> Is this your proposal((IMO hardcoding IO in driver won't be viable,
> isn't it?), or in smmu DT we would need to set the IO?
Unfortunately, I meant exactly that: hardcoding addresses of the SMMU
register spaces. see drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi_cfg.c
Then during device probe the driver can match the IO address to the
list of the per-platform ACTLR tables and select the correct one.
Then you don't even need a special actlrcfg_gfx. The GFX will fall
into the main schema.
>
>
> Thanks & regards,
> Bibek
>
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
> >> static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
> >> {
> >> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> >> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
> >> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> >> +
> >> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
> >> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
> >> +
> >
> > One issue occured to me, while I was reviewing the patchset. The ACTLR
> > settings are related to the whole SMMU setup, but we are applying them
> > each time there is an SMMU context init (in other words, one per each
> > domain). Is that correct? Or it's just that there is no better place
> > for initialising the global register set? Would it be better to
> > reprogram the ACTLR registers which are related just to this
> > particular domain?
> >
> >> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> >> index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> >> /*
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> */
> >>
> >> #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
> >> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
> >> const u32 *reg_offset;
> >> };
> >>
> >> +struct actlr_config;
> >> +
> >> struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
> >> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
> >> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
> >> const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
> >> const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
> >> const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> >> index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> >> @@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
> >> * expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
> >> * no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
> >> */
> >> - if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
> >> - !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
> >> +
> >> + if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
> >> return i;
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
> >> * though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> @@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> >> writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
> >> +{
> >> + return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2023-12-21 10:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2024-01-03 6:24 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-01-03 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, konrad.dybcio, jsnitsel, quic_bjorande,
mani, quic_eberman, robdclark, u.kleine-koenig, robh,
vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti, quic_molvera, linux-arm-msm,
linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel, qipl.kernel.upstream
On 12/21/2023 4:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 12:02, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/2023 6:06 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Bibek Kumar Patro
>>> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
>>>> the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
>>>> register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
>>>> to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
>>>> of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
>>>>
>>>> ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
>>>> in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
>>>> context bank initialisation.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 6 ++-
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 ++-
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 +++
>>>> 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> index 20c9836d859b..1cefdd0ca110 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
>>>> #define CPRE (1 << 1)
>>>> #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
>>>>
>>>> +struct actlr_config {
>>>> + u16 sid;
>>>> + u16 mask;
>>>> + u32 actlr;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>> {
>>>> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
>>>> @@ -215,9 +221,38 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>> return true;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
>>>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>>>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
>>>> + u16 mask;
>>>> + int idx;
>>>> + u16 id;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (; actlrcfg->sid || actlrcfg->mask || actlrcfg->actlr; actlrcfg++) {
>>>> + id = actlrcfg->sid;
>>>> + mask = actlrcfg->mask;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
>>>> + smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
>>>> + if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
>>>> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
>>>> + actlrcfg->actlr);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>>> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>>>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>>>> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>>>> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
>>>>
>>>> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>>>> @@ -248,6 +283,9 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>>> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>>>> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>>>>
>>>> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx)
>>>> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx);
>>>
>>> There was a feedback point against v4 that there can be more than two
>>> (apps + gpu) SMMU devices. No, we can not use additional compat
>>> strings, the SMMU units are compatible with each other.
>>
>> Just to understand better, did you mean if in the below check
>> [inside arm-smmu-qcom.c file during qcom_smmu_create()], "else" has two
>> things? (Currently adreno_impl for gpu smmu, else for only
>> apps smmu)
>
> qcom,adreno-smmu is quite unique here, this is the only distinctive
> substring. We do not have such compat strings for any other of SMMU
> nodes.
>
Apologies for the delayed response, I was on leave and could
not monitor the replies.
for other SMMUs (except qcom-adreno-smmu) we would
need to use the IO address matching.
>>
>> if (np && of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
>> impl = data->adreno_impl;
>> else
>> impl = data->impl;
>>
>>> Please add
>>> matching between the smmu and particular actlr table using the IO
>>> address of the SMMU block.
>>>
>>
>> The ACTLR table for each smmu will have A IO address attached, so based
>> on IO address we can apply ACTLR.
>> Is this your proposal((IMO hardcoding IO in driver won't be viable,
>> isn't it?), or in smmu DT we would need to set the IO?
>
> Unfortunately, I meant exactly that: hardcoding addresses of the SMMU
> register spaces. see drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi_cfg.c
> Then during device probe the driver can match the IO address to the
> list of the per-platform ACTLR tables and select the correct one.
> Then you don't even need a special actlrcfg_gfx. The GFX will fall
> into the main schema.
>
Thanks for the reference, I will check once and try to evaluate a
similar implementation for ACTLR table as well.
Thanks,
Bibek
>>
>>
>> Thanks & regards,
>> Bibek
>>
>>>> +
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -274,6 +312,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
>>>> static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>>> struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>>>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>>>> + int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg)
>>>> + qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, qsmmu->data->actlrcfg);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> One issue occured to me, while I was reviewing the patchset. The ACTLR
>>> settings are related to the whole SMMU setup, but we are applying them
>>> each time there is an SMMU context init (in other words, one per each
>>> domain). Is that correct? Or it's just that there is no better place
>>> for initialising the global register set? Would it be better to
>>> reprogram the ACTLR registers which are related just to this
>>> particular domain?
>>>
>>>> smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>>>> index f3b91963e234..cb4cb402c202 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>>> /*
>>>> - * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
>>>> const u32 *reg_offset;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +struct actlr_config;
>>>> +
>>>> struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
>>>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
>>>> + const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg_gfx;
>>>> const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
>>>> const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
>>>> const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>>>> index d6d1a2a55cc0..0c7f700b27dd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
>>>> @@ -990,9 +990,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
>>>> * expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
>>>> * no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
>>>> */
>>>> - if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
>>>> - !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
>>>> +
>>>> + if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
>>>> return i;
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
>>>> * though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> index 703fd5817ec1..2e4f65412c6b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> @@ -501,6 +501,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>>>> writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550
2023-12-20 13:38 [PATCH v6 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-20 13:38 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280 Bibek Kumar Patro
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, robin.murphy, joro, dmitry.baryshkov, konrad.dybcio,
jsnitsel, quic_bjorande, mani, quic_eberman, robdclark,
u.kleine-koenig, robh, vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti,
quic_molvera
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel,
qipl.kernel.upstream, Bibek Kumar Patro
Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 1cefdd0ca110..d6e87d0c8a4f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -23,6 +23,12 @@
#define CPRE (1 << 1)
#define CMTLB (1 << 0)
+#define PREFETCH_SHIFT 8
+#define PREFETCH_DEFAULT 0
+#define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define PREFETCH_SWITCH_GFX (5 << 3)
struct actlr_config {
u16 sid;
@@ -30,6 +36,70 @@ struct actlr_config {
u32 actlr;
};
+static const struct actlr_config sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x18a0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x18e0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0800, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1800, 0x00c0, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1820, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1860, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c01, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c02, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c03, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c04, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c05, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c06, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c07, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c08, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c09, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0c, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0d, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0e, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0f, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1961, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1962, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1963, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1964, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1965, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1966, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1967, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1968, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1969, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196c, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196d, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196e, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196f, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c1, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c2, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c3, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c4, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c5, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c6, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c7, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c8, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c9, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cc, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cd, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19ce, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cf, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1c00, 0x0002, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1c01, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1920, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1923, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1924, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1940, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1941, 0x0004, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1943, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1944, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1947, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ {},
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_config sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0000, 0x03ff, PREFETCH_SWITCH_GFX | PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ {},
+};
+
static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
@@ -580,6 +650,15 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
/* Also no debug configuration. */
};
+
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
+ .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
+ .actlrcfg = sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg,
+ .actlrcfg_gfx = sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg,
+};
+
static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
.impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
.adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
@@ -614,6 +693,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-smmu-500", .data = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ }
};
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280
2023-12-20 13:38 [PATCH v6 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550 Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2023-12-20 13:38 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2023-12-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: will, robin.murphy, joro, dmitry.baryshkov, konrad.dybcio,
jsnitsel, quic_bjorande, mani, quic_eberman, robdclark,
u.kleine-koenig, robh, vladimir.oltean, quic_pkondeti,
quic_molvera
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, iommu, linux-kernel,
qipl.kernel.upstream, Bibek Kumar Patro
Add ACTLR data table for SC7280 along with support for
same including SC7280 specific implementation operations.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index d6e87d0c8a4f..0b98e07820e1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -36,6 +36,22 @@ struct actlr_config {
u32 actlr;
};
+static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2000, 0x0163, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2080, 0x0461, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2100, 0x0161, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0900, 0x0407, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2180, 0x0027, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1000, 0x07ff, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ {},
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_config sc7280_gfx_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0000, 0x07ff, PREFETCH_SWITCH_GFX | PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ {},
+};
+
static const struct actlr_config sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
{ 0x18a0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
{ 0x18e0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
@@ -650,6 +666,13 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
/* Also no debug configuration. */
};
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sc7280_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
+ .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
+ .actlrcfg = sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg,
+ .actlrcfg_gfx = sc7280_gfx_actlr_cfg,
+};
static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
.impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
@@ -676,7 +699,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500", .data = &sc7280_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread