From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, James Dingwall <james@dingwall.me.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: pstore does not work under xen
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:41:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be41da82-3adc-4ab1-e4f9-5fdf11ac4b08@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201909231556.7FF7A11@keescook>
On 9/23/19 6:59 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:42:27PM +0000, James Dingwall wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:37:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 9/19/19 12:14 PM, James Dingwall wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:51:33PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>>>>> I have been investigating a regression in our environment where pstore
>>>>>> (efi-pstore specifically but I suspect this would affect all
>>>>>> implementations) no longer works after upgrading from a 4.4 to 5.0
>>>>>> kernel when running under xen. (This is an Ubuntu kernel but I don't
>>>>>> think there are patches which affect this area.)
>>>>> I don't have any answer for this ... but want to throw out the idea that
>>>>> VMM systems could provide some hypercalls to guests to save/return
>>>>> some blob of memory (perhaps the "save" triggers automagically if the
>>>>> guest crashes?).
>>>>>
>>>>> That would provide a much better pstore back end than relying on emulation
>>>>> of EFI persistent variables (which have severe contraints on size, and don't
>>>>> support some pstore modes because you can't dynamically update EFI variables
>>>>> hundreds of times per second).
>>>>>
>>>> For clarification this is a dom0 crash rather than an HVM guest with EFI. I
>>>> should probably have also mentioned the xen verion has changed from 4.8.4 to
>>>> 4.11.2 in case its behaviour on detection of crashed domain has changed.
>>>>
>>>> (For capturing guest crashes we have enabled xenconsole logging so the
>>>> hvc0 log is available in dom0.)
>>>
>>> Do you only see this difference between 4.4 and 5.0 when you crash via
>>> sysrq?
>>>
>>> Because that's where things changed. On 4.4 we seem to be forcing an
>>> oops, which eventually calls kmsg_dump() and then panic. On 5.0 we call
>>> panic() directly from sysrq handler. And because Xen's panic notifier
>>> doesn't return we never get a chance to call kmsg_dump().
>>>
>> Ok, I see that change in 8341f2f222d729688014ce8306727fdb9798d37e. I
>> hadn't tested it any other way before. Using the null pointer
>> de-reference module code at [1] a pstore record is generated as expected
>> when the module is loaded (panic_on_oops=1).
> This change looks correct -- it just gets us directly to the panic()
> state instead of exercising the various exception handlers.
>
>> I have also tested swapping the kmsg_dump() /
>> atomic_notifier_call_chain() around in panic.c and this also results in
>> a pstore record being created with sysrq-c. I don't know if that would
>> be an acceptable solution though since it may break behaviour that other
>> things depend on.
> I don't think reordering these is a good idea: as the comments say,
> there might be work done in the notifier chain that kmsg_dump() will
> want to capture (e.g. the KASLR base offset).
>
> The situation seems to be that notifier callbacks must return -- I think
> Xen needs fixing here.
>
I only had one quick sanity test with a PV guest so this needs more
testing. James, can you give it a try?
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 750f46ad018a..d88f118028b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -269,16 +269,17 @@ void xen_reboot(int reason)
BUG();
}
+static int reboot_reason = SHUTDOWN_reboot;
void xen_emergency_restart(void)
{
- xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot);
+ xen_reboot(reboot_reason);
}
static int
xen_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
*ptr)
{
if (!kexec_crash_loaded())
- xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash);
+ reboot_reason = SHUTDOWN_crash;
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
@@ -290,6 +291,8 @@ static struct notifier_block xen_panic_block = {
int xen_panic_handler_init(void)
{
atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list,
&xen_panic_block);
+ if (panic_timeout == 0)
+ set_arch_panic_timeout(-1, CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 10:26 James Dingwall
2019-09-19 15:51 ` Luck, Tony
2019-09-19 16:14 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-19 16:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-23 15:42 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-23 22:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-09-24 0:41 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2019-09-25 11:01 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-25 15:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be41da82-3adc-4ab1-e4f9-5fdf11ac4b08@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james@dingwall.me.uk \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®