From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: James Dingwall <james@dingwall.me.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: pstore does not work under xen
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:38:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c60c87d4-132d-b390-8b0e-1130fb434285@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925110152.GA31550@dingwall.me.uk>
On 9/25/19 7:01 AM, James Dingwall wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 08:41:05PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/23/19 6:59 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:42:27PM +0000, James Dingwall wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:37:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>> On 9/19/19 12:14 PM, James Dingwall wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:51:33PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have been investigating a regression in our environment where pstore
>>>>>>>> (efi-pstore specifically but I suspect this would affect all
>>>>>>>> implementations) no longer works after upgrading from a 4.4 to 5.0
>>>>>>>> kernel when running under xen. (This is an Ubuntu kernel but I don't
>>>>>>>> think there are patches which affect this area.)
>>>>>>> I don't have any answer for this ... but want to throw out the idea that
>>>>>>> VMM systems could provide some hypercalls to guests to save/return
>>>>>>> some blob of memory (perhaps the "save" triggers automagically if the
>>>>>>> guest crashes?).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That would provide a much better pstore back end than relying on emulation
>>>>>>> of EFI persistent variables (which have severe contraints on size, and don't
>>>>>>> support some pstore modes because you can't dynamically update EFI variables
>>>>>>> hundreds of times per second).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> For clarification this is a dom0 crash rather than an HVM guest with EFI. I
>>>>>> should probably have also mentioned the xen verion has changed from 4.8.4 to
>>>>>> 4.11.2 in case its behaviour on detection of crashed domain has changed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (For capturing guest crashes we have enabled xenconsole logging so the
>>>>>> hvc0 log is available in dom0.)
>>>>> Do you only see this difference between 4.4 and 5.0 when you crash via
>>>>> sysrq?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because that's where things changed. On 4.4 we seem to be forcing an
>>>>> oops, which eventually calls kmsg_dump() and then panic. On 5.0 we call
>>>>> panic() directly from sysrq handler. And because Xen's panic notifier
>>>>> doesn't return we never get a chance to call kmsg_dump().
>>>>>
>>>> Ok, I see that change in 8341f2f222d729688014ce8306727fdb9798d37e. I
>>>> hadn't tested it any other way before. Using the null pointer
>>>> de-reference module code at [1] a pstore record is generated as expected
>>>> when the module is loaded (panic_on_oops=1).
>>> This change looks correct -- it just gets us directly to the panic()
>>> state instead of exercising the various exception handlers.
>>>
>>>> I have also tested swapping the kmsg_dump() /
>>>> atomic_notifier_call_chain() around in panic.c and this also results in
>>>> a pstore record being created with sysrq-c. I don't know if that would
>>>> be an acceptable solution though since it may break behaviour that other
>>>> things depend on.
>>> I don't think reordering these is a good idea: as the comments say,
>>> there might be work done in the notifier chain that kmsg_dump() will
>>> want to capture (e.g. the KASLR base offset).
>>>
>>> The situation seems to be that notifier callbacks must return -- I think
>>> Xen needs fixing here.
>>>
>> I only had one quick sanity test with a PV guest so this needs more
>> testing. James, can you give it a try?
> I have tested the patch in a pv domU and in dom0. The kernel was built
> with a default Ubuntu .config which sets CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT=0. uname
> -r = 5.0.0-27-generic.
>
> In the domU (no custom kernel parameters):
>
> - sysrq-c: I saw my debug printk messages about kmsg_dump() being
> invoked after the traceback and the domain became listed as crashed in
> the xl status output.
>
> - halt -p: clean shutdown
>
> - shutdown -r now: clean reboot
>
>
> In the domU with panic=15 in kernel parameters:
>
> - sysrq-c: as without panic=15 then final message "Rebooting in 15
> seconds.." printed but domain never rebooted. Without this patch the
> domain doesn't reboot or print the Rebooting message presumably because
> of the non-returning panic handler. If that message is reached then I
> think I would expect a reboot. (In our Linux 4.4 / Xen 4.8.4
> environment no value of panic resulted in reboot.)
(+xen-devel which I just noticed has not been copied on this thread)
Whether a guest is rebooted is controlled by on_crash parameter in the
config file. By default it's 'destroy'.
>
> - halt -p: clean shutdown
>
> - shutdown -r now: clean reboot
>
>
> In dom0 with oops=panic panic=15 in the kernel parameters:
>
> - sysrq-c: kmsg_dump() debug messages printed, last linux message
> "Rebooting in 15 seconds..", after 15s "(XEN) Hardware Dom0 crashed:
> rebooting machine in 5 seconds.", after 5s system rebooted. On the
> next start a pstore record is present as expected.
>
> - halt -p: clean shutdown, no pstore record present on next start.
>
> - shutdown -r now: clean reboot, no pstore record present on next
> start.
>
>
> In dom0 with panic=0:
>
> - sysrq-c: dom0 crashes, no reboot messages printed from Xen or kernel
> and system hangs. A pstore record is present on next start.
>
> - halt -p: clean shutdown, no pstore record present on next start.
>
> - shutdown -r now: clean reboot, no pstore record present on next
> start.
>
>
> In my opinion this patch:
> - fixes the original issue of no pstore record being generated for a
> dom0 panic.
> - respects the dom0 panic=... value. This is a change in behaviour in
> how xen handles the crashed dom0 from always rebooting to only rebooting
> if panic > 0.
Even thought this is now correct behavior it's a change from what we've
always had. And I think we should preserve that.
Meaning that we have to ignore if panic_timeout is set to zero either on
boot line or via sysfs.
-boris
> - causes a Rebooting message to be printed in a crashed pv domU when
> panic > 0 but the domain does not reboot when it should.
>
> James
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> index 750f46ad018a..d88f118028b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -269,16 +269,17 @@ void xen_reboot(int reason)
>> BUG();
>> }
>>
>> +static int reboot_reason = SHUTDOWN_reboot;
>> void xen_emergency_restart(void)
>> {
>> - xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot);
>> + xen_reboot(reboot_reason);
>> }
>>
>> static int
>> xen_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void
>> *ptr)
>> {
>> if (!kexec_crash_loaded())
>> - xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_crash);
>> + reboot_reason = SHUTDOWN_crash;
>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -290,6 +291,8 @@ static struct notifier_block xen_panic_block = {
>> int xen_panic_handler_init(void)
>> {
>> atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list,
>> &xen_panic_block);
>> + if (panic_timeout == 0)
>> + set_arch_panic_timeout(-1, CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 10:26 James Dingwall
2019-09-19 15:51 ` Luck, Tony
2019-09-19 16:14 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-19 16:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-23 15:42 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-23 22:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-09-24 0:41 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-25 11:01 ` James Dingwall
2019-09-25 15:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c60c87d4-132d-b390-8b0e-1130fb434285@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james@dingwall.me.uk \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®