From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"rajatja@google.com" <rajatja@google.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhad.com" <mingo@redhad.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] trace: events: scsi: Add tag in SCSI trace events
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:09:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be6b85e181cd4894b89e1cd8ec0c0363@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> (raw)
>On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 20:27 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
>> By the way, these patches are not to add new feature, they are just to
>> add print tag along with the other exist printed request parameters.
>
>Are you aware that there are two tag fields in struct request, namely "tag"
>and "internal_tag"? Are you aware that how these fields are used depends on
>whether or not a scheduler is attached to a request queue? Have you verified
>that the "tag" field contains a meaningful value for blk-mq for every blk-mq
>tracepoint?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bart.
>
>
Yes, I noticed and was aware, there are tag and internal_tag.
One thing I was not aware is that the patches would make such a big impact on blk-mq based on
Your comments.
I am not expert on block layer, that is why I added block maintainer here.
Please point out which line and what is problem? If there is some wrong with the patch.
Which one is correct "tag" to track request?
Thanks,
//Bean Huo
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 12:09 Bean Huo (beanhuo) [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-17 10:00 Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2018-04-23 12:58 ` Steffen Maier
2018-04-16 21:10 Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2018-04-16 21:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 20:27 Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2018-04-16 20:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 17:05 Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2018-04-16 17:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 14:31 Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2018-04-16 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-16 16:41 ` Rajat Jain
2018-04-16 16:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 20:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-16 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-16 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be6b85e181cd4894b89e1cd8ec0c0363@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com \
--to=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhad.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®