mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 12:04:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf0b9232-36b0-41c5-89a5-6639719cd09e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416134208.383984-14-steven.price@arm.com>

On 16/04/2025 14:41, Steven Price wrote:
> The RMM provides emulation of a VGIC to the realm guest but delegates
> much of the handling to the host. Implement support in KVM for
> saving/restoring state to/from the REC structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes from v5:
>   * Handle RMM providing fewer GIC LRs than the hardware supports.
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h |  1 +
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c             | 16 +++++++++---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c             |  5 ++++
>   arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c  |  2 +-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c    |  6 ++++-
>   arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c       | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> index f716b890e484..9bcad6ec5dbb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct realm_rec {
>   
>   void kvm_init_rme(void);
>   u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void);
> +u32 kvm_realm_vgic_nr_lr(void);
>   
>   int kvm_realm_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap);
>   int kvm_init_realm_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index fd83efb667cc..808d7e479571 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -683,19 +683,24 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_put);
>   	}
>   
> +	kvm_timer_vcpu_put(vcpu);
> +	kvm_vgic_put(vcpu);
> +
> +	vcpu->cpu = -1;
> +
> +	if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> +		return;
> +
>   	kvm_vcpu_put_debug(vcpu);
>   	kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(vcpu);
>   	if (has_vhe())
>   		kvm_vcpu_put_vhe(vcpu);
> -	kvm_timer_vcpu_put(vcpu);
> -	kvm_vgic_put(vcpu);
>   	kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(vcpu);
>   	if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
>   		kvm_vcpu_put_hw_mmu(vcpu);
>   	kvm_arm_vmid_clear_active();
>   
>   	vcpu_clear_on_unsupported_cpu(vcpu);
> -	vcpu->cpu = -1;
>   }
>   
>   static void __kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -912,6 +917,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm) && kvm_is_realm(vcpu->kvm)) {
> +		/* Userspace irqchip not yet supported with Realms */
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
>   	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
>   	set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags);
>   	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> index f4923fc3b34e..1239eb07aca6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void)
>   	return u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_S2SZ);
>   }
>   
> +u32 kvm_realm_vgic_nr_lr(void)
> +{
> +	return u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_GICV3_NUM_LRS);
> +}
> +
>   static int get_start_level(struct realm *realm)
>   {
>   	return 4 - ((realm->ia_bits - 8) / (RMM_PAGE_SHIFT - 3));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> index 1f33e71c2a73..a81c7f3d1d42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
>   	 * the proper checks already.
>   	 */
>   	if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2 &&
> -		!kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2)
> +	    (!kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2 || kvm_is_realm(kvm)))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	/* Must be held to avoid race with vCPU creation */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index b9ad7c42c5b0..c10ad817030d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@
>   #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>   #include <linux/string_choices.h>
>   #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>   #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
>   #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>   #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
>   
>   #include "vgic.h"
>   
> @@ -758,7 +760,9 @@ void vgic_v3_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (likely(!is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> +	if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> +		cpu_if->vgic_vmcr = vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.gicv3_vmcr;
> +	else if (likely(!is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
>   		kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_save_vmcr_aprs, cpu_if);
>   	WARN_ON(vgic_v4_put(vcpu));
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 8d189ce18ea0..c68a41a29917 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@
>   #include <linux/list_sort.h>
>   #include <linux/nospec.h>
>   
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>   #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_rme.h>
>   
>   #include "vgic.h"
>   
> @@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ struct vgic_global kvm_vgic_global_state __ro_after_init = {
>   
>   static inline int kvm_vcpu_vgic_nr_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
> +	if (unlikely(vcpu_is_rec(vcpu)))
> +		return kvm_realm_vgic_nr_lr();
>   	return kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr;
>   }
>   
> @@ -864,10 +868,23 @@ static inline bool can_access_vgic_from_kernel(void)
>   	return !static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif) || has_vhe();
>   }
>   
> +static inline void vgic_rmm_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kvm_vcpu_vgic_nr_lr(vcpu); i++) {
> +		cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.gicv3_lrs[i];
> +		vcpu->arch.rec.run->enter.gicv3_lrs[i] = 0;
> +	}
> +}

We also need to save/restore gicv3_hcr/cpuif->vgic_hcr.

> +
>   static inline void vgic_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif))
>   		vgic_v2_save_state(vcpu);
> +	else if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> +		vgic_rmm_save_state(vcpu);
>   	else
>   		__vgic_v3_save_state(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);
>   }
> @@ -903,10 +920,28 @@ void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	vgic_prune_ap_list(vcpu);
>   }
>   
> +static inline void vgic_rmm_restore_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kvm_vcpu_vgic_nr_lr(vcpu); i++) {
> +		vcpu->arch.rec.run->enter.gicv3_lrs[i] = cpu_if->vgic_lr[i];
> +		/*
> +		 * Also populate the rec.run->exit copies so that a late
> +		 * decision to back out from entering the realm doesn't cause
> +		 * the state to be lost
> +		 */
> +		vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.gicv3_lrs[i] = cpu_if->vgic_lr[i];
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static inline void vgic_restore_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif))
>   		vgic_v2_restore_state(vcpu);
> +	else if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
> +		vgic_rmm_restore_state(vcpu);
>   	else
>   		__vgic_v3_restore_state(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);
>   }
> @@ -976,7 +1011,9 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   void kvm_vgic_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
> -	if (unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) || !vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))) {
> +	if (unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		     !vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		     vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))) {


>   		if (has_vhe() && static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif))
>   			__vgic_v3_activate_traps(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);
>   		return;
> @@ -990,7 +1027,9 @@ void kvm_vgic_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   void kvm_vgic_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
> -	if (unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) || !vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm))) {
> +	if (unlikely(!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		     !vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +		     vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))) {
>   		if (has_vhe() && static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_vgic_global_state.gicv3_cpuif))
>   			__vgic_v3_deactivate_traps(&vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);

We could return early here for rec, and skip the unnecessary trap steps. 
Similar for the vgic_load case.

Rest looks good to me.

Suzuki


>   		return;


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-02 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 13:41 [PATCH v8 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-04-25 10:30   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-04-25 10:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-25 10:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-04-25 11:08   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 13:31     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-04-28  8:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 13:31     ` Steven Price
2025-05-01 13:47       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-30  4:25   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 13:44     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-04-29  9:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 15:09     ` Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:39   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 15:11     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:47   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-05-01 16:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:54   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 16:51   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-05-02 11:04   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2025-05-12 14:44     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-05-02 12:22   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-04-30 11:38   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 16:00     ` Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:59       ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-06 13:23   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-13 10:43       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-14 10:24         ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-04-30 11:55   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-07 10:26   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-29  4:52   ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-06-02 15:14     ` Steven Price
2025-06-02 15:16       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-04-30 12:11   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 13:50     ` Steven Price
2025-05-07 10:42   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-16 13:50     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-05-19 18:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-05-01  0:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 15:33     ` Steven Price
2025-05-20 14:48       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21  8:55         ` Steven Price
2025-05-19 17:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-20 14:58     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21  9:10     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-05-19 17:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21 10:21     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:54   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-19 17:56   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:57   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:59   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 14:59   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-05-20 13:20   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:01   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:36   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01  3:40     ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01  3:40   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:47   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-05-20 12:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:49   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:50   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:50   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:52   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:30   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:41   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 13:15   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:04   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:04   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:06   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 13:12   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-02  0:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 16:00   ` Steven Price
2025-05-15  3:01 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-05-16 15:57   ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf0b9232-36b0-41c5-89a5-6639719cd09e@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®