mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] devmem: Block mmap access when read/write access is restricted
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:38:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf63b3e3-afdd-424c-87dc-f5488e770315@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67f8a1a15cc29_7205294d7@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>

On 4/10/25 21:59, Dan Williams wrote:
>> I don't think we can just fail the mmap. 🙁
> For the TVM case the havoc of failing mmap for DMI info is smaller and
> the recommended fallback for /dev/mem being in accessible is
> /sys/firmware/dmi/tables. So I feel ok making TVMs take the modern
> replacement path which is what they would need to do anyway in the
> lockdown_kernel case. Tom, Dave, what do you think?

Yeah, doing the same as lockdown should be fine.

The other alternative to failing all mmap()s is to allow mmap(PROT_READ)
to succeed and then just map the zero page.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11  1:22 [PATCH v2 0/3] Restrict devmem for confidential VMs Dan Williams
2025-04-11  1:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/devmem: Remove duplicate range_is_allowed() definition Dan Williams
2025-04-14 18:17   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-16 21:25     ` Dan Williams
2025-04-17  7:28       ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-17 18:27         ` Dan Williams
2025-04-19  9:09           ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-11  1:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] devmem: Block mmap access when read/write access is restricted Dan Williams
2025-04-11  2:32   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  4:59     ` Dan Williams
2025-04-11 15:38       ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-04-11 21:48         ` Dan Williams
2025-04-11  1:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/devmem: Restrict /dev/mem access for potentially unaccepted memory by default Dan Williams
2025-04-14 18:22   ` Naveen N Rao
2025-04-16 21:30     ` Dan Williams
2025-04-14 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Restrict devmem for confidential VMs Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf63b3e3-afdd-424c-87dc-f5488e770315@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®