From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
david.kaplan@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] stop_machine: Add NMI-based execution path
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 19:44:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfe8f403-06c9-4e93-9bcb-738c9128c557@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015211426.49114-3-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
On 16.10.26 г. 0:14 ч., Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Currently multi_cpu_stop() executes the stop function in the
> MULTI_STOP_RUN state. But NMIs can still preempt the execution. For use
> cases requiring stricter isolation from them, provide an option to run
> the stop function from NMI context.
>
> Then, the NMI stop function must be built without instrumentation, as
> exceptions may re-enable NMIs on return via IRET. Annotate the NMI
> handler entirely with noinstr.
>
> However, objtool cannot reliably determine whether the indirect call
> target is located in a noinstr section, so it may emit false positives.
> To avoid this, temporarily lift the instrumentation restriction around
> the indirect call site and document the intention.
>
> The x86 microcode loader is currently the primary user for this. But
> other architectures are not expected to use it. Add a build option to
> make it opt-in.
>
> Originally-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260129121729.GRaXtP2aeWkQKegxC2@fat_crate.local
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87wm0zl8p2.ffs@tglx
> ---
> V2 -> V3: Address Sashiko review
> * Avoid instrumentable functions:
> smp_processor_id() -> raw_smp_processor_id()
> cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu() -> arch_test_and_clear_bit()
> * Remove `done` tag to avoid false setting. Instead, data == NULL as indicator
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 3 ++
> include/linux/stop_machine.h | 16 ++++++
> kernel/stop_machine.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 45c657772362..afa564261e1c 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -1878,4 +1878,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_CPU_ATTACK_VECTORS
> config HAVE_ARCH_GET_SECUREBOOT
> def_bool EFI
>
> +config STOP_MACHINE_NMI
> + bool
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> index 84e7fb627ba4..b53b028296e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
> */
> typedef int (*cpu_stop_fn_t)(void *arg);
>
> +/*
> + * Stop function variant runnable from NMI context. This makes the
> + * noinstr requirement explicit at the type level.
> + */
> +typedef int (*cpu_stop_nmisafe_fn_t)(void *arg);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> struct cpu_stop_work {
> @@ -186,4 +192,14 @@ stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
> }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE_NMI
> +
> +void arch_send_self_nmi(void);
> +bool noinstr stop_machine_nmi_handler(void);
> +
> +#else
> +static inline bool stop_machine_nmi_handler(void) { return false; }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE_NMI */
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_STOP_MACHINE */
> diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> index 8dcd5be67b85..ad01b7c5266c 100644
> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/nmi.h>
> #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
> /*
> * Structure to determine completion condition and record errors. May
> @@ -175,6 +176,15 @@ struct multi_stop_data {
>
> enum multi_stop_state state;
> atomic_t thread_ack;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE_NMI
> + /* Used in the NMI stop_machine variant */
> + bool use_nmi;
> + /* A separate function type to highlight noinstr requirement */
> + cpu_stop_nmisafe_fn_t nmisafe_fn;
> + /* cpumask of CPUs on which to raise an NMI */
> + cpumask_var_t nmi_cpus;
> +#endif
> };
>
> static void set_state(struct multi_stop_data *msdata,
> @@ -198,6 +208,8 @@ notrace void __weak stop_machine_yield(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
> cpu_relax();
> }
>
> +static int multi_stop_run(struct multi_stop_data *msdata);
> +
> /* This is the cpu_stop function which stops the CPU. */
> static int multi_cpu_stop(void *data)
> {
> @@ -236,7 +248,7 @@ static int multi_cpu_stop(void *data)
> break;
> case MULTI_STOP_RUN:
> if (is_active)
> - err = msdata->fn(msdata->data);
> + err = multi_stop_run(msdata);
> break;
> default:
> break;
> @@ -713,3 +725,88 @@ int stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data,
> mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
> return ret ?: done.ret;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE_NMI
> +
> +struct nmi_stop {
> + struct multi_stop_data *data;
> + int ret;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct nmi_stop, nmi_stop);
> +
> +/*
> + * Instrumentation may trigger nested exceptions such as #INT3, #DB,
> + * or #PF. IRET from those would re-enable NMIs, which opposes the goal
> + * of this NMI stop-machine facility.
> + */
> +bool noinstr stop_machine_nmi_handler(void)
> +{
> + struct multi_stop_data *msdata = raw_cpu_read(nmi_stop.data);
> + unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!msdata || !arch_test_and_clear_bit(cpu, cpumask_bits(msdata->nmi_cpus)))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * The indirect call to @nmisafe_fn() is indistinguishable at
> + * post-compilation. Temporarily enabling instrumentation avoids
> + * objtool false positives.
> + */
> + instrumentation_begin();
> + ret = msdata->nmisafe_fn(msdata->data);
> + instrumentation_end();
> +
> + raw_cpu_write(nmi_stop.ret, ret);
> + raw_cpu_write(nmi_stop.data, NULL);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
I think this function should be moved over to patch 5 and by having
moved/subsumed patch 4, Patch 5 should become patch 3 really so related
functionality is introduced in subsequent patches.
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 21:14 [PATCH v3 0/9] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] stop_machine: Refactor multi-CPU stop glue code Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] stop_machine: Add NMI-based execution path Chang S. Bae
2026-11-06 17:44 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] stop_machine: Introduce stop_machine_nmi_cpuslocked() Chang S. Bae
2026-10-16 7:15 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-16 13:46 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-11-06 17:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] x86/apic: Implement self-NMI support Chang S. Bae
2026-11-06 17:32 ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] x86/nmi: Support NMI stop-machine handler Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/microcode: Distinguish NMI control path on stop-machine callback Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] x86/microcode: Use stop-machine NMI facility Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] x86/nmi: Simplify offline microcode handler invocation Chang S. Bae
2026-10-15 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/microcode: Remove microcode_nmi_handler_enable Chang S. Bae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfe8f403-06c9-4e93-9bcb-738c9128c557@suse.com \
--to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®