From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
To: "jeff millar" <wa1hco@adelphia.net>
Cc: "Frank van Maarseveen" <F.vanMaarseveen@inter.nl.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???
Date: 06 Dec 2002 12:36:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <buou1hrkee3.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <007301c29cd3$95ad99d0$6a01a8c0@wa1hco>
"jeff millar" <wa1hco@adelphia.net> writes:
> If a kernel runs 90% efficient now, then there's only 10% additional
> improvement possible. If you want to break new ground, then it's
> either application space or hardware.
YEah, but then the guys taking advantage of the opportunity to break
new ground in hardware turn the world on it's head -- and suddenly your
highly tuned kernel is is only 1% efficient...
-Miles
--
Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-06 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 13:03 cs driver SANTHOSH K
2002-12-04 15:26 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Shane Helms
2002-12-04 17:01 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-04 18:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-04 18:07 ` Richard B. Tilley (Brad)
2002-12-04 18:21 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-04 18:39 ` Erik Andersen
2002-12-05 16:59 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-05 0:27 ` jeff millar
2002-12-05 23:55 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2002-12-06 0:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-06 3:00 ` jeff millar
2002-12-06 3:36 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2002-12-06 8:55 ` Helge Hafting
2002-12-05 2:00 Ed Vance
2002-12-05 12:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 12:54 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 13:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-12-05 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 19:52 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-07 20:34 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-05 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-05 17:47 ` yodaiken
2002-12-05 19:08 ` John Bradford
2002-12-06 6:15 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 6:30 ` John Alvord
2002-12-06 9:48 ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-07 20:43 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-07 20:39 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-09 14:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-12-10 0:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 14:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-05 14:58 Nicholas Berry
[not found] <sdef2367.029@mail-02.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 15:17 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 15:38 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-05 15:44 ` Eric Weigle
[not found] <sdef301b.011@mail-01.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 16:36 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 3:29 ` Keith Adamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=buou1hrkee3.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp \
--to=miles@lsi.nec.co.jp \
--cc=F.vanMaarseveen@inter.nl.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=wa1hco@adelphia.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®