From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: alexandre.chartre@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/13] objtool: Function validation tracing
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0153249-5643-492f-ab2f-70dcafcfdd0c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d52b6b3a-dd18-4c8e-b7f6-5ac0879d959a@oracle.com>
On 6/10/25 09:07, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>
>
> On 6/9/25 20:31, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This RFC provides two changes to objtool.
>>>
>>> - Disassemble code with libopcodes instead of running objdump
>>>
>>> objtool executes the objdump command to disassemble code. In particular,
>>> if objtool fails to validate a function then it will use objdump to
>>> disassemble the entire file which is not very helpful when processing
>>> a large file (like vmlinux.o).
>>>
>>> Using libopcodes provides more control about the disassembly scope and
>>> output, and it is possible to disassemble a single instruction or
>>> a single function. Now when objtool fails to validate a function it
>>> will disassemble that single function instead of disassembling the
>>> entire file.
>>>
>>> - Add the --trace <function> option to trace function validation
>>>
>>> Figuring out why a function validation has failed can be difficult because
>>> objtool checks all code flows (including alternatives) and maintains
>>> instructions states (in particular call frame information).
>>>
>>> The trace option allows to follow the function validation done by objtool
>>> instruction per instruction, see what objtool is doing and get function
>>> validation information. An output example is shown below.
>>
>> What do I need for this to build? It wasn't compiling due to missing
>> bfd.h, so I installed binutils-devel (Fedora) and now I get:
>
> That's because of the more recent binutils versions, while I have been using an old
> one (2.30) and some functions have changed. But tools/dis-asm-compat.h handles that
> when the appropriate #define is set.
>
> Below is a quick fix (tested with binutils 2.41), and I will work on a proper fix
> (by using the tools/ features to check the disassembler version).
>
Here is the patch to handle both old and new binutils versions:
8<------------------------------------------------------------------->8
diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile
index 00350fc7c662..91a2858fea14 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
+++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(CURDIR)))
srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(srctree)))
endif
+FEATURE_USER = .objtool
+FEATURE_TESTS = disassembler-init-styled
+FEATURE_DISPLAY = disassembler-init-styled
+include $(srctree)/tools/build/Makefile.feature
+
LIBSUBCMD_DIR = $(srctree)/tools/lib/subcmd/
ifneq ($(OUTPUT),)
LIBSUBCMD_OUTPUT = $(abspath $(OUTPUT))/libsubcmd
@@ -40,6 +45,10 @@ OBJTOOL_LDFLAGS := $(LIBELF_LIBS) $(LIBSUBCMD) $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS) -lopcodes
elfshdr := $(shell echo '$(pound)include <libelf.h>' | $(HOSTCC) $(OBJTOOL_CFLAGS) -x c -E - 2>/dev/null | grep elf_getshdr)
OBJTOOL_CFLAGS += $(if $(elfshdr),,-DLIBELF_USE_DEPRECATED)
+ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-init-styled), 1)
+OBJTOOL_CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
+endif
+
# Always want host compilation.
HOST_OVERRIDES := CC="$(HOSTCC)" LD="$(HOSTLD)" AR="$(HOSTAR)"
8<------------------------------------------------------------------->8
alex.
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> index 00350fc7c662..300ea727e454 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ WARNINGS := $(EXTRA_WARNINGS) -Wno-switch-default -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-packed -
> OBJTOOL_CFLAGS := -Werror $(WARNINGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) -g $(INCLUDES) $(LIBELF_FLAGS)
> OBJTOOL_LDFLAGS := $(LIBELF_LIBS) $(LIBSUBCMD) $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS) -lopcodes
>
> +OBJTOOL_CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
> +
> # Allow old libelf to be used:
> elfshdr := $(shell echo '$(pound)include <libelf.h>' | $(HOSTCC) $(OBJTOOL_CFLAGS) -x c -E - 2>/dev/null | grep elf_getshdr)
> OBJTOOL_CFLAGS += $(if $(elfshdr),,-DLIBELF_USE_DEPRECATED)
>
>
> alex.
>
>
>> In file included from disas.c:12:
>> /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h:10:6: error: redeclaration of ‘enum disassembler_style’
>> 10 | enum disassembler_style {DISASSEMBLER_STYLE_NOT_EMPTY};
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> In file included from /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/objtool/include/objtool/arch.h:10,
>> from disas.c:6:
>> /usr/include/dis-asm.h:53:6: note: originally defined here
>> 53 | enum disassembler_style
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h: In function ‘init_disassemble_info_compat’:
>> /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h:50:9: error: too few arguments to function ‘init_disassemble_info’
>> 50 | init_disassemble_info(info, stream,
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /usr/include/dis-asm.h:480:13: note: declared here
>> 480 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> make[4]: *** [/home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:86: /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/objtool/disas.o] Error 1
>> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[3]: *** [Makefile:65: /home/jpoimboe/git/linux/tools/objtool/objtool-in.o] Error 2
>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:73: objtool] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [/home/jpoimboe/git/linux/Makefile:1448: tools/objtool] Error 2
>> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 15:34 Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 01/13] objtool: Move disassembly functions to a separated file Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 02/13] objtool: Create disassembly context Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 21:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 03/13] objtool: Disassemble code with libopcodes instead of running objdump Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 21:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-11 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-11 13:35 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-11 19:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 04/13] objtool: Print symbol during disassembly Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 21:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 05/13] objtool: Store instruction disassembly result Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 22:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 06/13] objtool: Disassemble instruction on warning or backtrace Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 07/13] objtool: Extract code to validate instruction from the validate branch loop Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 23:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 08/13] objtool: Record symbol name max length Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 09/13] objtool: Add option to trace function validation Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-11 0:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 10/13] objtool: Trace instruction state changes during " Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-11 1:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 11/13] objtool: Improve register reporting " Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 12/13] objtool: Improve tracing of alternative instructions Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:34 ` [RFC 13/13] objtool: Do not validate IBT for .return_sites and .call_sites Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-06 15:58 ` [RFC 00/13] objtool: Function validation tracing Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 19:29 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-09 18:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-10 7:07 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-10 13:00 ` Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2025-06-10 21:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-11 6:00 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-06-11 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0153249-5643-492f-ab2f-70dcafcfdd0c@oracle.com \
--to=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®