From: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] sched/core: Fixed missing rq clock update before calling set_rq_offline()
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:31:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c06dd33c-bc91-e0a9-096c-d135ce4fedcb@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230613082012.49615-2-jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
On 2023/6/13 Hao Jia wrote:
> This is triggered during cpu offline when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is enabled
> and cpufreq is set to powersave:
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
> WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 754 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1496
> enqueue_top_rt_rq+0x139/0x160
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? intel_pstate_update_util+0x3b0/0x3b0
> rq_offline_rt+0x1b7/0x250
> set_rq_offline.part.120+0x28/0x60
> rq_attach_root+0xc4/0xd0
> cpu_attach_domain+0x3dc/0x7f0
> ? __schedule+0x65e/0x1310
> partition_sched_domains_locked+0x2a5/0x3c0
> rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x477/0x830
> ? percpu_rwsem_wait+0x140/0x140
> rebuild_sched_domains+0x1b/0x30
> cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2ca/0xc90
> ? balance_push+0x56/0x120
> ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
> ? finish_task_switch+0x98/0x2f0
> ? __switch_to+0x116/0x410
> ? __schedule+0x65e/0x1310 ? internal_add_timer+0x42/0x60
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40
> ? add_timer_on+0xd5/0x130
> process_one_work+0x1bc/0x3d0
> worker_thread+0x4c/0x380
> ? preempt_count_add+0x56/0xa0
> ? rescuer_thread+0x310/0x310
> kthread+0xe6/0x110
> ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> More detailed key function call graph:
> rq_offline_rt()
> __disable_runtime()
> sched_rt_rq_enqueue()
> enqueue_top_rt_rq()
> cpufreq_update_util() <-- depends on CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> data->func(data, *rq_clock(rq)*, flags)
> intel_pstate_update_util() <-- powersave policy callback function
>
> Before calling rq_offline_rt() we need to update the rq clock to avoid
> using the old rq clock, So we add update_rq_clock() to set_rq_offline()
> to update rq clock. And we use rq_lock_irqsave()/rq_unlock_irqrestore()
> to replace raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave()/raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore()
> in rq_attach_root() to ensure that rq->clock_update_flags are cleared
> before updating the rq clock.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Enable CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_CPU_FREQ when compiling the kernel
> 2. echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/clear_warn_once
> 3. cpupower -c all frequency-set -g powersave
> 4. Run some rt tasks e.g. Create 5*n rt (100% running) tasks (on a
> system with n CPUs)
> 5. Offline cpu one by one until the warninng is triggered
>
> Suggested-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
Hi Vincent,
Benjamin Segall suggested adding update_rq_clock() to set_rq_offline()
instead of calling update_rq_clock() before set_rq_offline() runs.
The code of patch1 has changed, so I removed your tag "Reviewed-by".
Please review again.
Thanks,
Hao
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index a68d1276bab0..a8be5415daba 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -9548,6 +9548,7 @@ void set_rq_offline(struct rq *rq)
> if (rq->online) {
> const struct sched_class *class;
>
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
> for_each_class(class) {
> if (class->rq_offline)
> class->rq_offline(rq);
> @@ -9689,7 +9690,6 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
>
> rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
> if (rq->rd) {
> - update_rq_clock(rq);
> BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
> set_rq_offline(rq);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 6682535e37c8..52976eadfee9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -487,9 +487,9 @@ static void free_rootdomain(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq, struct root_domain *rd)
> {
> struct root_domain *old_rd = NULL;
> - unsigned long flags;
> + struct rq_flags rf;
>
> - raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave(rq, flags);
> + rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
>
> if (rq->rd) {
> old_rd = rq->rd;
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq, struct root_domain *rd)
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq->cpu, cpu_active_mask))
> set_rq_online(rq);
>
> - raw_spin_rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, flags);
> + rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>
> if (old_rd)
> call_rcu(&old_rd->rcu, free_rootdomain);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-13 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-13 8:20 [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix some warnings about rq clock Hao Jia
2023-06-13 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] sched/core: Fixed missing rq clock update before calling set_rq_offline() Hao Jia
2023-06-13 8:31 ` Hao Jia [this message]
2023-06-13 9:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-06-19 11:04 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Hao Jia
2023-06-13 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/core: Avoid double calling update_rq_clock() in __balance_push_cpu_stop() Hao Jia
2023-06-15 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-16 7:56 ` [External] " Hao Jia
2023-06-16 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-19 11:04 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Hao Jia
2023-06-19 12:18 ` [External] " Hao Jia
2023-06-13 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] sched/core: Avoid multiple calling update_rq_clock() in __cfsb_csd_unthrottle() Hao Jia
2023-06-19 11:04 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Hao Jia
2023-06-13 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/core: Avoid multiple calling update_rq_clock() in unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() Hao Jia
2023-06-13 21:52 ` Benjamin Segall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c06dd33c-bc91-e0a9-096c-d135ce4fedcb@bytedance.com \
--to=jiahao.os@bytedance.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®