Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction.

[Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 31/01/2025 09:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> Which doesn't help me a bit.  Every additional bit that the another
> language creeps in drastically reduces the maintainability of the kernel
> as an integrated project.  The only reason Linux managed to survive so
> long is by not having internal boundaries, and adding another language
> complely breaks this.  You might not like my answer, but I will do
> everything I can do to stop this.  This is NOT because I hate Rust.
> While not my favourite language it's definitively one of the best new
> ones and I encourage people to use it for new projects where it fits.
> I do not want it anywhere near a huge C code base that I need to
> maintain.
> 

I do acknowledge your reservations about the possible maintenance burden 
due to the introduction of a rust (or another language) consumer of the 
dma-api. But I was hoping that we could arrive at some sort of common 
ground?

If this rust middle-layer abstraction is unacceptable to you, could you 
perhaps suggest a solution so that all rust device driver don’t end up 
with redundant dma coherent allocator rust code? Could the rust team do 
something about it?

Thanks,

Abdiel