mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 01/16] cpuset: use update_partition_sd_lb in update_cpumasks_hier
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 22:37:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c40f7e09-3262-4de3-86e6-31a4a6a5338f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250928071306.3797436-2-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

On 9/28/25 3:12 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> For cgroup v2, when a cpuset is not a valid partition root, it inherits
> the CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE flag from its parent. The existing logic in
> update_cpumasks_hier() manually handled this inheritance condition.
>
> This patch replaces the inline implementation with a call to the dedicated
> update_partition_sd_lb() helper function, which already encapsulates the
> same logic. The helper function comprehensively handles both the load
> balance flag update and the necessary scheduling domain rebuild decision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 16 +++-------------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 52468d2c178a..052f9e0c7a65 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1257,6 +1257,8 @@ static void update_partition_sd_lb(struct cpuset *cs, int old_prs)
>   	bool rebuild_domains = (new_prs > 0) || (old_prs > 0);
>   	bool new_lb;
>   
> +	if (!cpuset_v2())
> +		return;
>   	/*
>   	 * If cs is not a valid partition root, the load balance state
>   	 * will follow its parent.
> @@ -2276,19 +2278,7 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
>   			!cpumask_equal(cp->cpus_allowed, cp->effective_cpus));
>   
>   		cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(cp, cp->effective_cpus);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * On default hierarchy, inherit the CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE
> -		 * from parent if current cpuset isn't a valid partition root
> -		 * and their load balance states differ.
> -		 */
> -		if (cpuset_v2() && !is_partition_valid(cp) &&
> -		    (is_sched_load_balance(parent) != is_sched_load_balance(cp))) {
> -			if (is_sched_load_balance(parent))
> -				set_bit(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE, &cp->flags);
> -			else
> -				clear_bit(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE, &cp->flags);
> -		}
> +		update_partition_sd_lb(cp, old_prs);
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * On legacy hierarchy, if the effective cpumask of any non-
Calling update_partition_sd_lb() directly from update_cpumasks_hier() 
may incorrectly force rebuidling sched domain when it is not really 
necessary.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-28  7:12 [PATCH -next RFC 00/16] cpuset: rework local partition logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 01/16] cpuset: use update_partition_sd_lb in update_cpumasks_hier Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:37   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-10-20  7:30     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 02/16] cpuset: generalize validate_partition() interface Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 03/16] cpuset: factor out partition_enable() function Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:39   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  7:48     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-20 19:42       ` Waiman Long
2025-10-21  0:52         ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 04/16] cpuset: factor out partition_disable() function Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 05/16] cpuset: factor out partition_update() function Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:43   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:05     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-20 19:45       ` Waiman Long
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 06/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:44   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:06     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 07/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:46   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:06     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 08/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_invalidate() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:48   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:28     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 09/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:57   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  9:24     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 10/16] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 11/16] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:00   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:44     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 12/16] cpuset: unify local partition disable and invalidate Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 13/16] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:02   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:47     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 14/16] cpuset: fix isolcpus stay in root when isolated partition changes to root Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:06   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  9:13     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-22 10:49     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 15/16] cpuset: use partition_disable for update_prstate Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 16/16] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  9:57 ` [PATCH -next RFC 00/16] cpuset: rework local partition logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-28 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-29  1:17   ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-17  1:05   ` Chen Ridong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c40f7e09-3262-4de3-86e6-31a4a6a5338f@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®