mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 07/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable()
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 22:46:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d719fdbc-515e-4386-b4d8-1d5fc0f7edf1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250928071306.3797436-8-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

On 9/28/25 3:12 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>
> The partition_disable() function introduced earlier can be extended to
> handle local partition disablement.
>
> First, partition_disable() was enhanced to support local partitions by
> properly managing the parent's nr_subparts counter and integrating
> notification operations.
>
> Then, local_partition_disable() is introduced, which extracts the local
> partition disable logic from update_parent_effective_cpumask(). It calls
> partition_disable() to complete the disablement process.
>
> This refactoring establishes a clear separation between local and remote
> partition operations while promoting code reuse through the shared
> partition_disable() infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 154992cdfe9a..87ba43e93540 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1576,13 +1576,20 @@ static void partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent,
>   				    int new_prs, enum prs_errcode prs_err)
>   {
>   	bool isolcpus_updated;
> +	int old_prs;
>   
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(new_prs > 0);
>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpuset_v2());
>   
> +	old_prs = cs->partition_root_state;
>   	spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
>   	list_del_init(&cs->remote_sibling);
> +	if (parent && is_partition_valid(parent) &&
> +	    is_partition_valid(cs)) {
> +		parent->nr_subparts -= 1;
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(parent->nr_subparts < 0);
> +	}
>   	/* disable a partition should only delete exclusive cpus */
>   	isolcpus_updated = partition_xcpus_del(cs->partition_root_state,
>   						parent, cs->effective_xcpus);
> @@ -1592,6 +1599,9 @@ static void partition_disable(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent,
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
>   	update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask(isolcpus_updated);
>   	cpuset_force_rebuild();
> +	/* Clear exclusive flag; no errors are expected */
> +	update_partition_exclusive_flag(cs, new_prs);
> +	notify_partition_change(cs, old_prs);
>   }
>   

Similarly, change to partition_disable() should be done previously in 
patch 4 ("cpuset: factor out partition_disable() function") for 
completeness.

Cheers,
Longman



  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-28  7:12 [PATCH -next RFC 00/16] cpuset: rework local partition logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 01/16] cpuset: use update_partition_sd_lb in update_cpumasks_hier Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:37   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  7:30     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 02/16] cpuset: generalize validate_partition() interface Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 03/16] cpuset: factor out partition_enable() function Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:39   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  7:48     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-20 19:42       ` Waiman Long
2025-10-21  0:52         ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 04/16] cpuset: factor out partition_disable() function Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 05/16] cpuset: factor out partition_update() function Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:43   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:05     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-20 19:45       ` Waiman Long
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 06/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_enable() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:44   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:06     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 07/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_disable() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:46   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-10-20  8:06     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 08/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_invalidate() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:48   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:28     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:12 ` [PATCH -next RFC 09/16] cpuset: introduce local_partition_update() Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  2:57   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  9:24     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 10/16] cpuset: remove redundant partition field updates Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 11/16] cpuset: simplify partition update logic for hotplug tasks Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:00   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:44     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 12/16] cpuset: unify local partition disable and invalidate Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 13/16] cpuset: use partition_disable for compute_partition_effective_cpumask Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:02   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  8:47     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 14/16] cpuset: fix isolcpus stay in root when isolated partition changes to root Chen Ridong
2025-10-20  3:06   ` Waiman Long
2025-10-20  9:13     ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-22 10:49     ` Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 15/16] cpuset: use partition_disable for update_prstate Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  7:13 ` [PATCH -next RFC 16/16] cpuset: remove prs_err clear when notify_partition_change Chen Ridong
2025-09-28  9:57 ` [PATCH -next RFC 00/16] cpuset: rework local partition logic Chen Ridong
2025-09-28 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-29  1:17   ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-17  1:05   ` Chen Ridong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d719fdbc-515e-4386-b4d8-1d5fc0f7edf1@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®