mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 20/48] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e30ad1-6fbe-448f-a9fe-6a2480581082@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02582577-3701-4d5c-88c6-3ce0b3328377@arm.com>

On 20/03/2026 16:32, Steven Price wrote:
> On 20/03/2026 14:08, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 18/03/2026 15:53, Steven Price wrote:
>>> Entering a realm is done using a SMC call to the RMM. On exit the
>>> exit-codes need to be handled slightly differently to the normal KVM
>>> path so define our own functions for realm enter/exit and hook them
>>> in if the guest is a realm guest.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v12:
>>>    * Call guest_state_{enter,exit}_irqoff() around rmi_rec_enter().
>>>    * Add handling of the IRQ exception case where IRQs need to be briefly
>>>      enabled before exiting guest timing.
>>> Changes since v8:
>>>    * Introduce kvm_rec_pre_enter() called before entering an atomic
>>>      section to handle operations that might require memory allocation
>>>      (specifically completing a RIPAS change introduced in a later patch).
>>>    * Updates to align with upstream changes to hpfar_el2 which now
>>> (ab)uses
>>>      HPFAR_EL2_NS as a valid flag.
>>>    * Fix exit reason when racing with PSCI shutdown to return
>>>      KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN rather than KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN.
>>> Changes since v7:
>>>    * A return of 0 from kvm_handle_sys_reg() doesn't mean the register has
>>>      been read (although that can never happen in the current code). Tidy
>>>      up the condition to handle any future refactoring.
>>> Changes since v6:
>>>    * Use vcpu_err() rather than pr_err/kvm_err when there is an associated
>>>      vcpu to the error.
>>>    * Return -EFAULT for KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT as per the documentation for
>>>      this exit type.
>>>    * Split code handling a RIPAS change triggered by the guest to the
>>>      following patch.
>>> Changes since v5:
>>>    * For a RIPAS_CHANGE request from the guest perform the actual RIPAS
>>>      change on next entry rather than immediately on the exit. This allows
>>>      the VMM to 'reject' a RIPAS change by refusing to continue
>>>      scheduling.
>>> Changes since v4:
>>>    * Rename handle_rme_exit() to handle_rec_exit()
>>>    * Move the loop to copy registers into the REC enter structure from the
>>>      to rec_exit_handlers callbacks to kvm_rec_enter(). This fixes a bug
>>>      where the handler exits to user space and user space wants to modify
>>>      the GPRS.
>>>    * Some code rearrangement in rec_exit_ripas_change().
>>> Changes since v2:
>>>    * realm_set_ipa_state() now provides an output parameter for the
>>>      top_iap that was changed. Use this to signal the VMM with the correct
>>>      range that has been transitioned.
>>>    * Adapt to previous patch changes.
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h |   4 +
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile          |   2 +-
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c             |  26 ++++-
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c        | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c             |  43 ++++++++
>>>    5 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>>> asm/kvm_rmi.h
>>> index 4e2c61e71a38..7bec3a3976e7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
>>> @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
>>>    void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm);
>>>    void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>>    +int kvm_rec_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> +int kvm_rec_pre_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> +int handle_rec_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rec_run_status);
>>> +
>>>    static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm *realm,
>>>                            unsigned long addr)
>>>    {
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>>> index e17c4077d8e7..4b103bcbe760 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CFLAGS_handle_exit.o += -Wno-override-init
>>>    kvm-y += arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o hypercalls.o pvtime.o \
>>>         inject_fault.o va_layout.o handle_exit.o config.o \
>>>         guest.o debug.o reset.o sys_regs.o stacktrace.o \
>>> -     vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o rmi.o \
>>> +     vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pkvm.o rmi.o rmi-exit.o \
>>>         arch_timer.o trng.o vmid.o emulate-nested.o nested.o at.o \
>>>         vgic/vgic.o vgic/vgic-init.o \
>>>         vgic/vgic-irqfd.o vgic/vgic-v2.o \
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 45eff4c41cde..badb94b398bc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -1311,6 +1311,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>            if (ret > 0)
>>>                ret = check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
>>>    +        if (ret > 0 && vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
>>> +            ret = kvm_rec_pre_enter(vcpu);
>>> +
>>>            /*
>>>             * Preparing the interrupts to be injected also
>>>             * involves poking the GIC, which must be done in a
>>> @@ -1358,7 +1361,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>            trace_kvm_entry(*vcpu_pc(vcpu));
>>>            guest_timing_enter_irqoff();
>>>    -        ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu);
>>> +        if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
>>> +            ret = kvm_rec_enter(vcpu);
>>> +        else
>>> +            ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu);
>>>              vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE;
>>>            vcpu->stat.exits++;
>>> @@ -1404,7 +1410,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>             * context synchronization event) is necessary to ensure that
>>>             * pending interrupts are taken.
>>>             */
>>> -        if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret) == ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ) {
>>> +        if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(ret) == ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ ||
>>> +            (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu) &&
>>> +             vcpu->arch.rec.run->exit.exit_reason == RMI_EXIT_IRQ)) {
>>>                local_irq_enable();
>>>                isb();
>>>                local_irq_disable();
>>> @@ -1416,8 +1424,13 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>              trace_kvm_exit(ret, kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>>> *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
>>>    -        /* Exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
>>> -        handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
>>> +        if (!vcpu_is_rec(vcpu)) {
>>> +            /*
>>> +             * Exit types that need handling before we can be
>>> +             * preempted
>>> +             */
>>> +            handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
>>> +        }
>>>              kvm_nested_sync_hwstate(vcpu);
>>>    @@ -1442,7 +1455,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu)
>>>                ret = ARM_EXCEPTION_IL;
>>>            }
>>>    -        ret = handle_exit(vcpu, ret);
>>> +        if (vcpu_is_rec(vcpu))
>>> +            ret = handle_rec_exit(vcpu, ret);
>>> +        else
>>> +            ret = handle_exit(vcpu, ret);
>>>        }
>>>          /* Tell userspace about in-kernel device output levels */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f5701153dec0
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi-exit.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>>> +#include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
>>> +#include <kvm/arm_psci.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
>>> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>>> +#include <asm/kvm_rmi.h>
>>> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>>> +
>>> +typedef int (*exit_handler_fn)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_reason_notimpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +
>>> +    vcpu_err(vcpu, "Unhandled exit reason from realm (ESR: %#llx)\n",
>>> +         rec->run->exit.esr);
>>> +    return -ENXIO;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_sync_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    return kvm_handle_guest_abort(vcpu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_sync_iabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +
>>> +    vcpu_err(vcpu, "Unhandled instruction abort (ESR: %#llx).\n",
>>> +         rec->run->exit.esr);
>>> +    return -ENXIO;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +    unsigned long esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
>>> +    int rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu);
>>> +    bool is_write = !(esr & 1);
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    if (is_write)
>>> +        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, rec->run->exit.gprs[0]);
>>
>> The RMM has been fixed to indicate the correct value in ESR_ELx_SRT. So
>> this could be :
>>          vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, rec->run->ext.gprs[rt]); ?
>>
>>> +
>>> +    ret = kvm_handle_sys_reg(vcpu);
>>> +    if (!is_write)
>>> +        rec->run->enter.gprs[0] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt);
>>
>> Same here ^
> 
> True, although no functional change because it's always going to be 0.
> 
>>> +
>>> +    return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static exit_handler_fn rec_exit_handlers[] = {
>>> +    [0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]    = rec_exit_reason_notimpl,
>>> +    [ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]    = rec_exit_sys_reg,
>>> +    [ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW]    = rec_exit_sync_dabt,
>>> +    [ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW]    = rec_exit_sync_iabt
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_psci(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +    int i;
>>> +
>>> +    for (i = 0; i < REC_RUN_GPRS; i++)
>>> +        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, i, rec->run->exit.gprs[i]);
>>> +
>>> +    return kvm_smccc_call_handler(vcpu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int rec_exit_ripas_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>>> +    struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +    unsigned long base = rec->run->exit.ripas_base;
>>> +    unsigned long top = rec->run->exit.ripas_top;
>>> +    unsigned long ripas = rec->run->exit.ripas_value;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!kvm_realm_is_private_address(realm, base) ||
>>> +        !kvm_realm_is_private_address(realm, top - 1)) {
>>> +        vcpu_err(vcpu, "Invalid RIPAS_CHANGE for %#lx - %#lx, ripas:
>>> %#lx\n",
>>> +             base, top, ripas);
>>> +        /* Set RMI_REJECT bit */
>>> +        rec->run->enter.flags = REC_ENTER_FLAG_RIPAS_RESPONSE;
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Exit to VMM, the actual RIPAS change is done on next entry */
>>> +    kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, base, top - base, false, false,
>>> +                      ripas == RMI_RAM);
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT requires an return code of -EFAULT, see the
>>> +     * API documentation
>>> +     */
>>> +    return -EFAULT;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void update_arch_timer_irq_lines(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +
>>> +    __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CTL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntv_ctl);
>>> +    __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CVAL_EL0, rec->run-
>>>> exit.cntv_cval);
>>> +    __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CTL_EL0, rec->run->exit.cntp_ctl);
>>> +    __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CVAL_EL0, rec->run-
>>>> exit.cntp_cval);
>>> +
>>> +    kvm_realm_timers_update(vcpu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Return > 0 to return to guest, < 0 on error, 0 (and set
>>> exit_reason) on
>>> + * proper exit to userspace.
>>> + */
>>> +int handle_rec_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rec_run_ret)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +    u8 esr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(rec->run->exit.esr);
>>> +    unsigned long status, index;
>>> +
>>> +    status = RMI_RETURN_STATUS(rec_run_ret);
>>> +    index = RMI_RETURN_INDEX(rec_run_ret);
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * If a PSCI_SYSTEM_OFF request raced with a vcpu executing, we
>>> might
>>> +     * see the following status code and index indicating an attempt
>>> to run
>>> +     * a REC when the RD state is SYSTEM_OFF.  In this case, we just
>>> need to
>>> +     * return to user space which can deal with the system event or
>>> will try
>>> +     * to run the KVM VCPU again, at which point we will no longer
>>> attempt
>>> +     * to enter the Realm because we will have a sleep request
>>> pending on
>>> +     * the VCPU as a result of KVM's PSCI handling.
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (status == RMI_ERROR_REALM && index == 1) {
>>> +        vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN;
>>> +        return 0;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (rec_run_ret)
>>> +        return -ENXIO;
>>> +
>>> +    vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = rec->run->exit.esr;
>>
>> Even ESR_EL2 is only valid when the exit reason is RMI_EXIT_SYNC or
>> RMI_EXIT_SERROR.
>> Doing this unconditional copying is fine, as long as we don't consume
>> the esr_el2 in exit handling without consulting the exit reason, which
>> may not be available to the rest of the KVM. It may be safer to set it
>> to 0 ?
> 
> For HPFAR_EL2 there is code in the kernel which hijacks the EL2_NS bit a
> 'valid' bit, hence we have to handle that one specially to record
> whether the value is valid or not.
> 
> esr_el2/far_el2 may or may not be valid depending on the exit, but
> there's no 'valid' flag for the generic kernel code to look for - so
> that generic code either depends on the value (in which case 0 is just
> as invalid) or doesn't use it.
> 
> My preference is to avoid trying to keep track of the exit reasons where
> such flags are valid and just provide the generic code with whatever the
> RMM provides. In any case the values are generally 'sanitised' by the
> RMM so they don't represent the real CPU registers.
> 
>>> +    vcpu->arch.fault.far_el2 = rec->run->exit.far;
>>> +    /* HPFAR_EL2 is only valid for RMI_EXIT_SYNC */
>>> +    vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2 = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    update_arch_timer_irq_lines(vcpu);
>>> +
>>> +    /* Reset the emulation flags for the next run of the REC */
>>> +    rec->run->enter.flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    switch (rec->run->exit.exit_reason) {
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_SYNC:
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * HPFAR_EL2_NS is hijacked to indicate a valid HPFAR value,
>>> +         * see __get_fault_info()
>>> +         */
>>> +        vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2 = rec->run->exit.hpfar |
>>> HPFAR_EL2_NS;
>>> +        return rec_exit_handlers[esr_ec](vcpu);
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_IRQ:
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_FIQ:
>>> +        return 1;
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_PSCI:
>>> +        return rec_exit_psci(vcpu);
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE:
>>> +        return rec_exit_ripas_change(vcpu);
>>
>> RMI_EXIT_SERROR is missing in the list above.
> 
> Indeed, I think I need to read up on how that's meant to be handled.
> 
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    kvm_pr_unimpl("Unsupported exit reason: %u\n",
>>> +              rec->run->exit.exit_reason);
>>
>>
>>
>>> +    vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
>>> index 6daf14c4b413..ee8aab098117 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
>>> @@ -394,6 +394,49 @@ static int realm_ensure_created(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>        return -ENXIO;
>>>    }
>>>    +/*
>>> + * kvm_rec_pre_enter - Complete operations before entering a REC
>>> + *
>>> + * Some operations require work to be completed before entering a
>>> realm. That
>>> + * work may require memory allocation so cannot be done in the
>>> kvm_rec_enter()
>>> + * call.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 1 if we should enter the guest
>>> + *       0 if we should exit to userspace
>>> + *       < 0 if we should exit to userspace, where the return value
>>> indicates
>>> + *       an error
>>> + */
>>> +int kvm_rec_pre_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +
>>> +    if (kvm_realm_state(vcpu->kvm) != REALM_STATE_ACTIVE)
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +    switch (rec->run->exit.exit_reason) {
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_HOST_CALL:
>>> +    case RMI_EXIT_PSCI:
>>> +        for (int i = 0; i < REC_RUN_GPRS; i++)
>>> +            rec->run->enter.gprs[i] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, i);
>>> +        break;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int noinstr kvm_rec_enter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    guest_state_enter_irqoff();
>>> +    ret = rmi_rec_enter(virt_to_phys(rec->rec_page),
>>> +                virt_to_phys(rec->run));
>>
>> In the normal VM case, we try to fixup some of the exits (e.g., GIC
>> CPUIF register accesses) which may be applicable to Realms. Do we
>> need such fixups here ? Given the cost of world switch, it is
>> debatable whether it matters or not.
> 
> I'm not really sure what you are referring to here. Can you point me at
> the normal VM case? This function is the equivalent of
> kvm_arm_vcpu_enter_exit().

This happens via fixup_guest_exit() in either vhe/nvhe cases. The VGIC
registers are emulated in the fast path for normal VMs (when trapping is
enabled)


Cheers
Suzuki

> 
> Thanks,
> Steve
> 
>> Suzuki
>>> +    guest_state_exit_irqoff();
>>> +
>>> +    return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static void free_rec_aux(struct page **aux_pages,
>>>                 unsigned int num_aux)
>>>    {
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-18 15:53 [PATCH v13 00/48] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 01/48] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 02/48] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 03/48] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 04/48] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-03-18 16:07   ` Joey Gouly
2026-03-18 17:07     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 05/48] arm64: RMI: Temporarily add SMCs from RMM v1.0 spec Steven Price
2026-03-21 13:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-03-23 10:30     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 06/48] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 07/48] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-03-19 10:38   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-19 12:47     ` Steven Price
2026-03-19 16:17   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-19 16:42     ` Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:05   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:01     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 08/48] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 09/48] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 10/48] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-03-19 10:31   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-19 15:20     ` Steven Price
2026-03-19 10:41   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-30 20:58   ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-31 11:05     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-31 17:43       ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 11/48] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 12/48] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-03-19 16:11   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-19 16:24     ` Steven Price
2026-03-19 17:17   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:07     ` Steven Price
2026-03-21 16:34   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-04-01 10:54     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 13/48] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-03-19 14:09   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-19 15:25     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 14/48] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 15/48] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-03-19 17:35   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-21 13:04       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-04-10 15:11         ` Steven Price
2026-03-20 10:37   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-20 16:14     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 16/48] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 17/48] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:10   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:26     ` Steven Price
2026-03-23 11:56   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 18/48] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 19/48] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 20/48] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-03-20 14:08   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-20 16:32     ` Steven Price
2026-03-23 10:03       ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-04-10 15:11         ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 21/48] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-03-20 11:15   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-10 15:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 22/48] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 23/48] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-03-19 19:01   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:39     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 24/48] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-03-23 11:32   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-10 15:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 25/48] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 26/48] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:25   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:41     ` Steven Price
2026-03-21 16:20       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 27/48] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:41   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:44     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 28/48] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 29/48] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 30/48] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-03-30 10:36   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 31/48] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-03-30 10:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 32/48] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2026-03-30 10:52   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-10 15:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 33/48] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 34/48] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-03-30 10:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-18 15:53 ` [PATCH v13 35/48] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 36/48] arm64: RMI: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2026-03-19 10:24   ` Joey Gouly
2026-03-19 16:02     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 37/48] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-03-19 10:27   ` Joey Gouly
2026-04-10 15:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:46   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:45     ` Steven Price
2026-03-21 16:23       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 38/48] arm64: RMI: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 39/48] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:50   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:45     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 40/48] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 41/48] arm64: RMI: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 42/48] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 43/48] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 44/48] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 45/48] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-03-19 18:53   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-03-20 16:45     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 46/48] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2026-03-19 17:36   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-10 15:12     ` Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 47/48] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price
2026-03-18 15:54 ` [PATCH v13 48/48] [WIP] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-03-18 16:53 ` [PATCH v13 00/48] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-03-19 23:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-20 16:45   ` Steven Price
2026-03-20 19:15     ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-03-25  6:37     ` Gavin Shan
2026-03-25 10:16       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-25 11:32         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-26  0:48         ` Gavin Shan
2026-03-26 11:22           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-03-25  4:07 ` Gavin Shan
2026-03-25 10:19   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-14 21:40 ` Alper Gun
2026-04-15 11:01   ` Steven Price
2026-04-15 23:27     ` Alper Gun
2026-04-16 11:04       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-04-16 17:44         ` Alper Gun
2026-04-21 13:51 ` Jiahao zheng
     [not found] ` <20260421135145.14789-1-jahao.zheng@gmail.com_quarantine>
2026-04-22 15:38   ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4e30ad1-6fbe-448f-a9fe-6a2480581082@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®