* [PATCH] arm_mpam: Reject ris_idx == MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS
@ 2026-10-22 8:57 Ping Li
2026-10-26 12:16 ` Ben Horgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ping Li @ 2026-10-22 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: james.morse, ben.horgan
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, reinette.chatre, fenghuay, Ping Li
While checking the driver's partid and ris bound checks, after the
hardware team mistakenly configured PARTID_MAX in an MSC to 16,
this issue was found: MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS is the max number of
RIS an MSC can have, so a ris_idx of 16 passes the current check,
and would later be silently truncated to 0 by FIELD_PREP(),
landing all configuration for that ris on RIS 0.
Signed-off-by: Ping Li <leeonion.muyu@gmail.com>
---
drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
index 48adc49b833c..347a5a6d6a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int mpam_ris_create_locked(struct mpam_msc *msc, u8 ris_idx,
lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
- if (ris_idx > MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS)
+ if (ris_idx >= MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS)
return -EINVAL;
if (test_and_set_bit(ris_idx, &msc->ris_idxs))
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm_mpam: Reject ris_idx == MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS
2026-10-22 8:57 [PATCH] arm_mpam: Reject ris_idx == MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS Ping Li
@ 2026-10-26 12:16 ` Ben Horgan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Horgan @ 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ping Li, james.morse
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, reinette.chatre, fenghuay
Hi Ping,
On 22/10/2026 09:57, Ping Li wrote:
> While checking the driver's partid and ris bound checks, after the
> hardware team mistakenly configured PARTID_MAX in an MSC to 16,
> this issue was found: MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS is the max number of
> RIS an MSC can have, so a ris_idx of 16 passes the current check,
> and would later be silently truncated to 0 by FIELD_PREP(),
> landing all configuration for that ris on RIS 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ping Li <leeonion.muyu@gmail.com>
Thanks for the patch. Yin already found the same bug and posted a fix first so I'll go with that one.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20261008-mpam-resctrl-dt-knp-support-v3-1-35196c2b43bf@oss.qualcomm.com/
Thanks,
Ben
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 48adc49b833c..347a5a6d6a1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int mpam_ris_create_locked(struct mpam_msc *msc, u8 ris_idx,
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
>
> - if (ris_idx > MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS)
> + if (ris_idx >= MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (test_and_set_bit(ris_idx, &msc->ris_idxs))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-22 8:57 [PATCH] arm_mpam: Reject ris_idx == MPAM_MSC_MAX_NUM_RIS Ping Li
2026-10-26 12:16 ` Ben Horgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®