From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@redhat.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:46:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c62985530812130646r6bcdf424o752f16458dd22914@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081213082054.GA7559@localhost>
2008/12/13 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>:
> [Steven Rostedt - Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:56:47PM -0500]
> ...
> | > Steve, here is how it could look like:
> | > (I liked first proposal more :)
> |
> | I see the confusion. In ftrace.h the function graph tracer config is not
> | inside CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER, even though it is dependent on it (or
> | was). OK, just do your first proposal then.
> |
> | -- Steve
> |
>
> ok, I sent it yesterday as
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/12/301
> [PATCH] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro v2
>
> Ingo, will you pick it up?
>
> - Cyrill -
>
Hi,
Looks good and clarify the asm bits.
I wonder if the function_graph_tracer should continue to necessarily
depend on the function tracer.
It was more simplier to do so but perhaps that could be avoided with
small modifications.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-13 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-12 18:41 Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-12 20:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 20:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-12 20:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 20:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 21:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-12 21:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 21:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 21:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-12 21:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-13 8:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-13 14:46 ` Frédéric Weisbecker [this message]
2008-12-13 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-12-13 15:28 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-12-13 15:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-13 15:26 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c62985530812130646r6bcdf424o752f16458dd22914@mail.gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®