mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: loic pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel@stlinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to create remoteproc local resource table
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:15:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6344597-ae92-a19c-7ee2-a28606871912@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160908102007.GO4921@dell>



On 09/08/2016 12:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote:
>
>> Rproc driver has now the capability to add resources dynamically
>> thanks to rproc_request_resource API.
>> Depending on associated action, resource request could impact
>> firmware resource table or define new local resource.
>>
>> In order to preserve current remoteproc resource handling
>> mechanism, all local resources are gathered in a local resource
>> table which won't be shared with firmware and proceed by
>> remoteproc core as firmware one.
>>
>> It is rproc driver responsibility to provide the right resource
>> information using rproc_request_resource API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index cbfbdf8..73b460a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -1270,6 +1270,65 @@ static int rproc_apply_resource_overrides(struct rproc *rproc,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +static struct resource_table*
>> +rproc_local_resource_create(struct rproc *rproc, int *tablesz)
>
> Oh, you're happy to use "resource" (instead of rsc) in function names
> that *you* introduce! ;)
In fact I changed only rproc_apply_resource_overrides sub functions, 
don't touch to other. But as mentioned previously, I'll revert name 
changing and come back to original naming in v3
>
>> +{
>> +	struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr;
>> +	struct fw_rsc_spare *spare_rsc;
>> +	struct rproc_request_resource *resource;
>> +	struct resource_table *table = NULL;
>> +	int size = 0, ret;
>> +
>> +	/* compute total request size */
>
> Grammar.
ok
>
>> +	list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
>> +		if (resource->action == RSC_ACT_LOCAL)
>> +			size += resource->size + sizeof(hdr) + 4; /* entry offset */
>> +	}
>
> The {} are superfluous.
>
> Still non sure if that comment helps at all.
>
>> +	/* any extra resource ? */
>
> /* If there isn't any resource remaining, don't ... XXX */
>
>> +	if (!size)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/* add table header and spare resource */
>> +	size += sizeof(*table);
>> +	size += sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*spare_rsc) + 4;
>> +
>> +	/* create new rsc tbl with only a spare resource */
>
> I would be as forthcoming as possible in comments.  Use
> full/descriptive names for things.
ok
>
>> +	table = devm_kzalloc(&rproc->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!table) {
>> +		table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>
> '\n'
ok
>
>> +	table->ver = 1;
>> +	table->num = 1;
>> +	table->offset[0] = sizeof(*table) + 4;
>> +
>> +	hdr = (void *)table + table->offset[0];
>> +	hdr->type = RSC_SPARE;
>> +
>> +	spare_rsc = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
>> +	spare_rsc->len = size - table->offset[0] - sizeof(*hdr) - sizeof(*spare_rsc);
>> +
>> +	/* add new resource one by one */
>
> "resources"
thanks
>
>> +	list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
>> +		if (resource->action == RSC_ACT_LOCAL) {
>> +			/* Create a new enty */
>
> This comment doesn't add any more information than the function name.
I'll remove
>
>> +			ret = __add_rsc_tbl_entry(rproc, resource,
>> +					table, size);
>> +			if (ret) {
>> +				table = ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +				goto out;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	*tablesz = size;
>> +	rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, *tablesz);
>
> This is going to add up to a lot of dumps of the resource table?
No only once when the complete table is populated
>
>> +out:
>> +	return table;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>
> Superfluous '\n'.
ok

Thanks for your review Lee, I'll prepare a V3 including your remarks

Regards,
Loic
>
>>  /*
>>   * take a firmware and boot a remote processor with it.
>>   */
>> @@ -1278,7 +1337,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>>  	const char *name = rproc->firmware;
>>  	struct resource_table *table, *loaded_table;
>> -	int ret, tablesz;
>> +	int ret, tablesz, local_tablesz;
>>
>>  	ret = rproc_fw_sanity_check(rproc, fw);
>>  	if (ret)
>> @@ -1335,6 +1394,11 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>  			goto clean_up;
>>  		}
>>
>> +		rproc->local_table = rproc_local_resource_create(rproc, &local_tablesz);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(rproc->local_table)) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to create local resource table\n");
>> +			goto clean_up;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>
>>  	/* reset max_notifyid */
>> @@ -1348,6 +1412,13 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>  		goto clean_up;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->local_table,
>> +				     local_tablesz, rproc_vdev_handler);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to handle vdev resources: %d\n", ret);
>> +		goto clean_up;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* handle fw resources which are required to boot rproc */
>>  	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->cached_table, tablesz,
>>  				     rproc_loading_handlers);
>> @@ -1356,6 +1427,13 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>  		goto clean_up;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->local_table,
>> +				     local_tablesz, rproc_loading_handlers);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to handle vdev resources: %d\n", ret);
>> +		goto clean_up;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* load the ELF segments to memory */
>>  	ret = rproc_load_segments(rproc, fw);
>>  	if (ret) {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> index 2b0f1d7..653e6f3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ struct rproc {
>>  	int max_notifyid;
>>  	struct resource_table *table_ptr;
>>  	struct resource_table *cached_table;
>> +	struct resource_table *local_table;
>>  	bool has_iommu;
>>  	bool auto_boot;
>>  };
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-31 20:50 [PATCH v2 00/19] remoteproc: Allow platform-specific drivers to request resources Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to the resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to dump " Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to amend an existing resource table entry Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to append a new " Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] remoteproc: core: Add explicit message error if cached table failed Loic Pallardy
2016-09-01  7:09   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:40     ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] remoteproc: Add new resource type for resource table spare bytes Loic Pallardy
2016-09-15 17:54   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-16  9:02     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-16 17:12       ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-19  7:50         ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] remoteproc: core: Associate action to resource request Loic Pallardy
2016-09-01  7:23   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:43     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:03       ` Lee Jones
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] remoteproc: core: Finalize dump resource table function Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:26   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:46     ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify an existing resource in rsc table Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to get resource table spare bytes information Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:32   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:47     ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support and force mode to resource amending function Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  8:48   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:49     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:02       ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08 13:11         ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] remoteproc: core: Append resource only if spare resource present Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08  9:33   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08  9:54     ` loic pallardy
2016-09-08 11:00       ` Lee Jones
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] remoteproc: core: Add resource request action support Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to verify resource table consistency Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] remoteproc: core: Clean-up resource table sanity checks Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] remotecore: core: Add resource table pointer argument to rproc_handle_resource Loic Pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to create remoteproc local resource table Loic Pallardy
2016-09-08 10:20   ` Lee Jones
2016-09-08 13:15     ` loic pallardy [this message]
2016-09-15 18:58   ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-09-19  7:46     ` loic pallardy
2016-08-31 20:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] remoteproc: core: Support empty resource tables Loic Pallardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6344597-ae92-a19c-7ee2-a28606871912@st.com \
    --to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®