From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, pi3orama@163.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_event_open.2: Document write_backward
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:05:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c805a296-8a65-9297-74fe-ee04926055c8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610211716280.16183@macbook-air>
On 10/21/2016 11:25 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Wang Nan wrote:
>
>> context_switch : 1, /* context switch data */
>> -
>> - __reserved_1 : 37;
>> + write_backward : 1, /* Write ring buffer from end to beginning */
>> + __reserved_1 : 36;
>
> This removes a blank line, not sure if intentional or not.
Maybe it would be better to keep it. I don't feel too strongly about
this though.
>> +.IR "write_backward" " (since Linux 4.6)"
>
> It didn't committed until Linux 4.7 from what I can tell?
Yes, that's my recollection too.
>
>> +This makes the resuling event use a backward ring-buffer, which
> resulting
>
>> +writes samples from the end of the ring-buffer.
>> +
>> +It is not allowed to connect events with backward and forward
>> +ring-buffer settings together using
>> +.B PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT.
>> +
>> +Backward ring-buffer is useful when the ring-buffer is overwritable
>> +(created by readonly
>> +.BR mmap (2)
>> +).
>
> A ring buffer is over-writable when it is mmapped readonly?
> Is this a hard requirement?
> Can you set the read-backwards bit if not mapped readonly?
Wang Nan, could you perhaps clarify this in the next version of the patch?
>
> Otherwise the documentation seems reasonable.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Thanks for reviewing both patches, Vince. Wang Nan, please include the
Reviewed-by: in the next patch iteration.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-22 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 11:38 [PATCH 1/2] perf_event_open.2: Document PERF_EVENT_IOC_PAUSE_OUTPUT Wang Nan
2016-10-21 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf_event_open.2: Document write_backward Wang Nan
2016-10-21 21:25 ` Vince Weaver
2016-10-22 10:05 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2016-10-24 6:44 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-10-21 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf_event_open.2: Document PERF_EVENT_IOC_PAUSE_OUTPUT Vince Weaver
2016-10-22 10:00 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-10-22 10:02 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c805a296-8a65-9297-74fe-ee04926055c8@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®